Electromagnetic N 1232 Transition Shin Nan Yang Department

  • Slides: 57
Download presentation
Electromagnetic N → (1232) Transition Shin Nan Yang Department of Physics National Taiwan University

Electromagnetic N → (1232) Transition Shin Nan Yang Department of Physics National Taiwan University Pascalutsa, Vanderhaeghen, SNY, Physic. Reports 437 (2007) 125, hep-ph/0609004. Lattice QCD Journal Club, NTU, April 20, 2007 1

Motivation QCD Hadronic phenomena l low energies ─ Ch. PT l high energies, high

Motivation QCD Hadronic phenomena l low energies ─ Ch. PT l high energies, high momentum transfer─ p. QCD l medium energies ․LQCD ․Phenomenology : hadron models, reaction theory Δ(1232) physics 2

 : 1 st, most prominent and non-overlapping resonance Discovered by Fermi in 1952

: 1 st, most prominent and non-overlapping resonance Discovered by Fermi in 1952 in πp scatterings 1232 3 2

Properties of (1232) l M = 1232 Me. V, = 120 Me. V l

Properties of (1232) l M = 1232 Me. V, = 120 Me. V l I(JP) = l Electromagnetic properties of the ? 4

Electromagnetic properties of the 1. , Q …. . of the E. g. ,

Electromagnetic properties of the 1. , Q …. . of the E. g. , + p → + 0 + p +p → + +p ( A 2/TAPS) (A 2/TAPS, MAMI) 1980’s 5

|GE 2| << |GM 1| GM 1, GE 2 photo- and electro -production of

|GE 2| << |GM 1| GM 1, GE 2 photo- and electro -production of pion 6

Parity and angular momentum of multipole radiation l electric multipole of order (l, m),

Parity and angular momentum of multipole radiation l electric multipole of order (l, m), parity = (-1)l l magnetic multipole of order (l, m), parity = (-1)l+1 Allowed multipole orders are l = 1 and 2, with parity = + 7

S S S D (deformed) (S=1/2, L=2) J=3/2 8

S S S D (deformed) (S=1/2, L=2) J=3/2 8

helicity conserving 9

helicity conserving 9

Jones-Scadron f. f’s 10

Jones-Scadron f. f’s 10

11

11

2 N → , Q N → in the * N → transition E.

2 N → , Q N → in the * N → transition E. g. , + N → + N , e+N →e+N+ For electroproduction, Coulomb quadrupole transition C 2 is allowed, in addition to magnetic dipole M 1 and electric quadrupole E 2 transitions. QN → = Q , > 0 1. 13 > > 0. 4 (Dillon and Morpurgo) 12

13

13

 * N → transition l In a symmetric SU(6) quark model the electromagnetic

* N → transition l In a symmetric SU(6) quark model the electromagnetic excitation of the could proceed only via M 1 transition. l If the is deformed, then the photon can excite a nucleon into a through electric E 2 and Coulomb C 2 quadrupole transitions. l At Q 2 = 0, recent experiments give, Rem = E 2/M 1 -2. 5 %, ( indication of a deformed ) l p. QCD predicts that, as Q 2 → ∞ hadronic helicity conservation: A 1/2 A 3/2 scaling: A 1/2 Q-3, A 3/2 Q-5, S 1+ Q-3 Rem = E 1+(3/2)/M 1+(3/2) → 1, Rsm = S 1+(3/2)/M 1+(3/2) → const. What region of Q 2 correspond to the transition from nonperturbative to p. QCD descriptions? 14

Two aspects of the problem 1) Theoretical predictions ü QCD-motivated models, e. g. ,

Two aspects of the problem 1) Theoretical predictions ü QCD-motivated models, e. g. , constituent quark models, bag models, skyrmion ü lattice QCD, large-Nc 2) Extraction from experiments ü dispersion relation ü dynamical model ü effective field theory 15

SU(6) constituent quark model Both N and ∆ are members of the [56]-plet and

SU(6) constituent quark model Both N and ∆ are members of the [56]-plet and the three quarks are in the (1 s)3 states p In a symmetric SU(6) quark model the e. m. excitation of the could proceed only via M 1 transition large-Nc QCD has an exact SU(6) spin-flavor symmetry p If the is deformed, then the photon can excite a nucleon into a through electric E 2 and Coulomb C 2 quardrupole transitions. p At Q 2 =0, recent experiments give, REM = E 2/M 1 ≈ -2. 5 %, (MAMI, LEGS) ( indication of a deformed ) 16

In constituent quark model, Tensor force Fermi contact term D-state component PD(%) N(938) 0.

In constituent quark model, Tensor force Fermi contact term D-state component PD(%) N(938) 0. 4 (1232) 1. 9 Q(fm 2) 0 -0. 089 -0. 8% < REM < -0. 3% Too small !! 17

EMR:E 2/M 1 RATIO (Theory) SU(6): MIT bag model: Large Nc : Non. rel.

EMR:E 2/M 1 RATIO (Theory) SU(6): MIT bag model: Large Nc : Non. rel. quark model: Relativized quark model: Cloudy bag model Chiral constituent quark model Skyrme model: PQCD: LQCD 0. 0 -0. 8% ~ -0. 3% -0. 1% -2. 0 to -3. 0% -1. 0 to -4. 0% -2. 5 to -6. 0% pion cloud models -100% 18

QCD: hadron helicity conservation at high Q 2 and scaling 19

QCD: hadron helicity conservation at high Q 2 and scaling 19

Lattice QCD Alexandrou et al , PR D 66, 094503 (2002) 20

Lattice QCD Alexandrou et al , PR D 66, 094503 (2002) 20

21

21

Alexandrou et al. , PR D 94, 021601 (2005) 22

Alexandrou et al. , PR D 94, 021601 (2005) 22

Pascalutsa and Vanderhaeghen, PR D 73, 034003 (2006) 23

Pascalutsa and Vanderhaeghen, PR D 73, 034003 (2006) 23

Extraction from experiments Ø dispersion relation (analyticity, crossing symmetry) Ø dynamical model (SL, DMT,

Extraction from experiments Ø dispersion relation (analyticity, crossing symmetry) Ø dynamical model (SL, DMT, DUO) Ø effective field theory (QCD symmetry, perturbative) SL: Sato-Lee DMT: Dubna-Mainz-Taipei DUO: dynamical Utrecht-Ohio 24

Dynamical model for * N → N Both on- & off-shell two ingredients v

Dynamical model for * N → N Both on- & off-shell two ingredients v , t N 25

In resonant channel like (3, 3), resonance excitation plays an important role. If a

In resonant channel like (3, 3), resonance excitation plays an important role. If a bare is assumed such that the transition potential v consists of two terms v (E)=v B + v (E), where v B = background transition potential • v (E) = 26

DMT Model (Dubna-Mainz-Taipei) 27

DMT Model (Dubna-Mainz-Taipei) 27

 N Model (Taipei-Argonne) Three-dimensional Bethe-Salpeter formulation with driving term, with pseudovector NN coupling,

N Model (Taipei-Argonne) Three-dimensional Bethe-Salpeter formulation with driving term, with pseudovector NN coupling, given by 28

29

29

Chiral effective theory in the Δ-resonance region (D. Phillips, V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen) 1.

Chiral effective theory in the Δ-resonance region (D. Phillips, V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen) 1. Chiral relativistic Lagrangian of π, N, and Δ 2. The Lagrangian is organized in powers of electromagntic coupling e, plus the number of derivatives of pion and photon field 3. Power counting for the γπamplitude: δ-expansion scheme. 4. Dressed Δ propagator = (p-Δ-Σ)-1. 30

Only electric e. NN coupling contributes in NLO 31

Only electric e. NN coupling contributes in NLO 31

MAID DMT 32

MAID DMT 32

33

33

34

34

Threshold electromagnetic production Photoproduction HBCh. PT O ( ) Dispersion relation Exp. ( )

Threshold electromagnetic production Photoproduction HBCh. PT O ( ) Dispersion relation Exp. ( ) -1. 1 -1. 22 -1. 33± 0. 88± 0. 03 -0. 43 -0. 56 -0. 45± 0. 06± 0. 02 • LET (Gauge Inv. + PCAC): Electroproduction 35

HBCh. PT:a low energy effective field theory respecting the symmetries of QCD, in particular,

HBCh. PT:a low energy effective field theory respecting the symmetries of QCD, in particular, chiral symmetry perturbative calculation - crossing symmetric DMT:Lippman-Schwinger type formulation with potential constructed from chiral effective lagrangian unitarity - loops to all orders What are the predictions of DMT? 36

Cooper-Jennings reduction scheme 37

Cooper-Jennings reduction scheme 37

38

38

bare excitation K-matrix Pion cloud effects 39

bare excitation K-matrix Pion cloud effects 39

full 40

full 40

Experimentally, it is only possible to extract the contribution of the following process, =

Experimentally, it is only possible to extract the contribution of the following process, = dressed vertex + bare vertex 41

A 1/2 (10 -3 Ge. V-1/2) A 3/2 QN → (fm 2) N→Δ PDG

A 1/2 (10 -3 Ge. V-1/2) A 3/2 QN → (fm 2) N→Δ PDG -135 -255 -0. 072 3. 512 LEGS -135 -267 -0. 108 3. 642 MAINZ -131 -251 -0. 0846 3. 46 DMT -134 (-80) -256 (-136) -0. 081 (0. 009) 3. 516 (1. 922) SL -121 (-90) -226 (-155) -0. 051 (0. 001) 3. 132 (2. 188) Comparison of our predictions for the helicity amplitudes, QN → and N → with experiments and Sato-Lee’s prediction. The numbers within the parenthesis in red correspond to the bare values. Q N→ = Q > 0, 1. 13 > > 0. 4 (Dillon and Morpurgo) is oblate !!! 42

For electroproduction : Q 2 -dependent 43

For electroproduction : Q 2 -dependent 43

44

44

45

45

46

46

47

47

48

48

49

49

50

50

Hadronic helicity conservation A 1/2 >> A 3/2? Not yet! 51

Hadronic helicity conservation A 1/2 >> A 3/2? Not yet! 51

scaling: A 1/2 ~ Q-3 A 3/2 ~ Q-5 S 1+ ~ Q-3 52

scaling: A 1/2 ~ Q-3 A 3/2 ~ Q-5 S 1+ ~ Q-3 52

Summary Ø Abundant precision data are now available from Bates (MIT), MAMI (Mainz), and

Summary Ø Abundant precision data are now available from Bates (MIT), MAMI (Mainz), and Jlab on e. m. production of pion for Q 2 ranging from 0. 0 to 6. 0 (Ge. V/c)2. Ø Existing data give clear indication of a deformed Δ. Ø DMT dynamical model describes well the existing data on pion photo- and electroproduction data from threshold up to 1 Ge. V photon lab. energy. it predicts N → = 3. 516 N , QN → = -0. 081 fm 2 , and REM = -2. 4%, all in close agreement with experiments. is oblate bare is almost spherical. The oblate deformation of the arises almost exclusively from the pion cloud. 53

Ø Existing data between Q 2 = 0 -6 (Ge. V/c)2 indicate l hadronic

Ø Existing data between Q 2 = 0 -6 (Ge. V/c)2 indicate l hadronic helicity conservation and scaling are still not yet observed in this region of Q 2. REM still remains negative. l | RSM | strongly increases with Q 2. l Ø Impressive progress have been made in the lattice QCD calculation for N → Δ e. m. transition form factors Ø More data at higher Q 2 will be available from Jlab upgrade Ø Other developments: N →Δ generalized parton distributions (GPDs), two-photon exchange effects, chiral effective field theory approach. Ø extension of dynamical model to higher energies 54

The end 55

The end 55

Dynamical model for * N → N To order e, the t-matrix for *

Dynamical model for * N → N To order e, the t-matrix for * N → N is written as where, t (E) = v + v g 0(E) t N (E), v = transition potential, (1) two ingredients t N (E) = N t-matrix, g 0 (E) = . v , t N Multipole decomposition of (1) gives the physical amplitude in channel =( , l , j) pion cloud effects where ( ), R( ) : N scattering phase shift and reaction matrix in channel k=| k|, q. E : photon and pion on-shell momentum 56

Electromagnetic N → (1232) Transition Shin Nan Yang Department of Physics National Taiwan University

Electromagnetic N → (1232) Transition Shin Nan Yang Department of Physics National Taiwan University Ø Motivations Ø Model for * N → N DMT (Dubna-Mainz-Taipei) dynamical model Effective field theory Ø Results Ø Summary Pascalutsa, Vanderhaeghen, SNY, Physic. Reports 437 (2007) 125, hep-ph/0609004. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, March 12, 2007 57