Efficient Ways of Increasing InLine Inspection Reliability NPO
Efficient Ways of Increasing In-Line Inspection Reliability “NPO SPETSNEFTEGAZ”
Statistics of In-Line Inspection of GAZPROM pipelines during the last 5 years • Total 77, 900 km gas pipelines were inspected in “GAZPROM” JSC • More than 1. 5 million pipeline defects were detected • 6947 stress corrosion cracking zones were located and sized
Quantitative Statistics on Types of Detected Defects
Main Disadvantages of MFL method • High magnetization level • Estimation of defect severity level strongly depends on pipeline defect identification
High magnetization level
High magnetization level
High magnetization level • Active electronic bypass (speed control) device V=0 V = 4 m/s
High magnetization level • Advantages of ordinary SNG ILI tools
High magnetization level • Alternative magnetization scheme Very high friction
Disadvantages of MFL method • In-line inspection of pipelines with thick walls is limited due to necessity to magnetize full pipe wall thickness up to outer pipe wall surface • All new Russian pipelines including Nord-Stream pipeline are thick wall pipelines • Only limited inspection is possible on almost all offshore pipelines
Comparison of ILI technologies detection of cracks with superimposed general corrosion
Photo of cracks on corrosion background
Pipeline defects identification statistics • Dig verification statistics reveals real ILI tool sensitivity • Latest results of MFL &TFI methods usage: – POD of cracks less than 20% p. w. t. deep is 90% – POI of shallow cracks with superimposed tiny corrosion is less than 60%
Advantages of EMAT In-Line Inspection “NPO SPETSNEFTEGAZ”
EMAT in-line inspection Pipe Coating Waves EMA system
Artificial crack signals TFI Length 41 mm Depth 4 mm Width 0. 01 mm Hole Crack EМАТ Hole Crack
EMAT in-line inspection TFI EМАТ
EMAT in-line inspection experience
EMAT in-line inspection experience
EMAT in-line inspection experience
EMAT in-line inspection challenge • Cracks with nearly zero opening – Detection – Identification – Sizing • Thick pipe wall corrosion damage – Detection – Identification – Sizing
- Slides: 21