Effectively integrating urban nodes in TENT corridors boosting

Effectively integrating urban nodes in TEN-T corridors, boosting innovation and interoperability Hearing of European Coordinators Catherine Trautmann and Karel Vinck Brussels, 4 May 2017 Mobility and Transport

Effectively integrating urban nodes and boosting innovation Role and challenges of urban nodes • Urban nodes are connecting points linking different transport modes and types of traffic (long-distance and urban/regional transport ) • They are essential for the effectiveness of the European transport corridors as well as for regional development and social cohesion • Urban logistics operations are part of national or international supply chains • Congestions costs nearly 100 billion Euro, or 1% of the EU's GDP, annually and is to a great extent located in urban areas • Urban nodes also face challenges relating to air and noise pollution, accidents, increasing demands and often protests from the citizens Mobility and Transport

Effectively integrating urban nodes and boosting innovation Potential of urban nodes • Urban nodes offer a great potential for economic development and spillover effects • They usually provide excellent conditions for establishing value-added logistics services and multimodal platforms • In fighting air pollution and congestion, urban nodes can act as a catalyst for modal shift • Good cooperation of cities and surrounding regions is needed to make traffic flows in urban nodes as efficient as they can be • Exchange of best practice can support the further development of innovative solutions for sustainable transport in urban nodes Mobility and Transport

Effectively integrating urban nodes and boosting innovation Innovation challenges and opportunities • Digitalisation and deployment of alternative fuels create challenges and opportunities for an interoperable and sustainable TEN-T • TEN-T and the Corridors could become catalysts and a new "space for innovation", presenting a unique opportunity to promote cooperation amongst all stakeholders: industry, Member States, local and regional authorities, users etc. • The Corridors can serve to pilot innovative solutions and facilitate largescale deployment, overcoming the so-called "valley of death" by strongly interconnecting R&I and deployment • Lessons learned and experiences from the TEN-T field need to be fed back into the R&I world, to refine concepts, technologies and solutions for a better performing trans-European network Mobility and Transport

Effectively integrating urban nodes and boosting innovation Aims of the Coordinators' issue papers on innovation and urban nodes: • Make full use of innovation, digitalisation and decarbonisation potential, as enablers of a fully multimodal and sustainable TEN-T • Integrate TEN-T in the respective urban realities and planning, contribute to the Urban Agenda for the EU (Pact of Amsterdam) • Seamless passenger mobility, efficient urban logistics connected to TENT • Urban nodes as platforms for innovation deployment, synergies between energy, transport and digital • Pave the way for flagship projects on the Corridors to be developed in 2017 and implemented within 3 -4 years Mobility and Transport

Our ultimate objective is INTEROPERABILITY. ERTMS is the most efficient tool to reach it. Mobility and Transport

ERTMS is more than a signalling system DIGITALISATION DECARBONISATION Backbone of digitalised rail Interoperability => modal shift network and basis for e. g. Capacity increase of 5 -10% autonomous driving that will increase long distance New communication system for freight traffic and short- and ERTMS defined by 2019 medium-distance passenger traffic Key enabler for interoperability and competitiveness of rail GLOBALISATION EU deployment provides base for EU suppliers to sell worldwide e. g. Saudi-Arabia, Australia, Turkey PEOPLE-FOCUSSED SOLUTIONS Benchmark system for rail safety e. g. commitment of BE to implement ERTMS nationwide Mobility and Transport

Interoperability objectives of Breakthrough programme 2015 (first Work Plan) • Stable and mature set of specifications • Realistic European Deployment Plan (EDP) for ERTMS (two-step approach) • standardised and complete, B 3 on-board equipment should be able to run everywhere in Europe; • An interoperable and compliant infrastructure where this standardised on-board unit (OBU) can run • National requirements reduced to a minimum • A clear and transparent regulatory framework (e. g. national requirements should be notified) • Harmonisation of operational and authorisation rules Mobility and Transport

State of play of Breakthrough programme implementation (second Work Plan) • Stable ERTMS specifications (B 3 R 2) were adopted in June 2016 • Reviewed EDP has been accepted and committed by Member States • Key commitments of Mo. U 2016 ØStandardised OBU ØTrack-side approval by ERA (reach an interoperable and compliant infrastructure ) • Agreement with European supplier industry Mobility and Transport

Action plan for ERTMS • To implement the Breakthrough programme and the Mo. U 2016 during period 2016 – 2023 Ø Standardised OBU Ø compliant infrastructure • Focus on Corridors (incl. Rail Freight Corridors) • Cross-border sections Mobility and Transport

ETCS status today Glasgow Edinburg h Oslo Belfast Örebro Dublin Gothenb urg Liverpool Copenhag en Cork Southampton Lyon Narbon ne Bilbao Valladoli d Zaragoza Madrid Ventspill s Malmö Barcelon a Tarragon a Tu rin Novara Vero na Mil an Avignon Genova Marseille La Spezia Livorno Trie ste Padova Koper Bologna Ravenna Rijeka Murcia Córdoba Zagr eb Timisoar a Vukobar Ploiesti Craiso va Vid in Sof ia Ancona Florence Sulina Buchares t Calafat Plov diy Constanț a Ruse Napoles Gioia Tauro Palermo Cartagen a Taranto Igoumeni tsa Catania Augusta Almería Patras Thesalon iki Athens/Pira eus Lefkosia Valetta Algeciras Burgas Rome Bari Sin es Brasov Arad Ljublj ana Venice Valencia Lisbon Antequ era/Bo badilla Hamina. Kot ka Tallinn Amsterda m Bordeau x Sevilla Helsinki Wilhelms. Ri Klaipeda Trellebor haven. Bremerha ga Lübeck g Gdynia Kaunas Utrecht. Deventer ven. Bremen Swinoujsc Vilnius Hamburg ie Gdansk Rostock Szczecin Osnabrüc Rotterd London Nijmege k am Hanno Poznan n Antwerp Berlin ver Duisburg Zeeburg Magdebur Warsaw Dortmun Düsseld f ge g Gent Dover d orf Lie Braun Cologne ge Leipzig Lodz Calai Brussels schw s Erfurt Frankfur Koblenz eig Wroclaw Lille t Dresden Mainz Würzbur g. Nuremb Plzen Pardubic Le Havre Mann. Ostrava Katowice erg heim Luxembur e Kosice Prague Karlsruh g Rouen Regensb e Brno Met Zilina urg z Vienna Strasbo París Sttutgart Bratislav urg Munich Salzburg Wels/Li a Dijon nz Györ Debrece Basel Tours n Innsbru ck Graz Budapest Felixtow e Birmingham Porto/ Leixóes Aveiro Turku/Naan tali Stockhol m Limasol

ETCS status year 2023 Glasgow Edinburg h Oslo Belfast Örebro Dublin Gothenb urg Liverpool Copenhag en Cork Turku/Naan tali Stockhol m Helsinki Hamina. Kot ka Tallinn Ventspill s Malmö Ri Wilhelms. Klaipeda Trellebor ga haven Bremerha Lübeck g Gdynia ven Kaunas Utrecht Deventer Felixtow Swinoujsc Bremen Vilnius Hamburg ie Gdansk e Rostock Szczecin Rotterda Osnabrüc London m Nijmege k Hanno n Poznan Berli Antwerp Zeeburg ver n Duisburg Magdebu Warsaw ge Dortmun f Düsseldo Gent rg Dover d Liege rf Braun. Cologne Cal Leipzig Lodz schweig Brussels ais Erfu Frankfur Koblenz Wroclaw Lille rt t Mai Dresden Würzbur nz g. Nuremb Plzen Pardubic Ostrava Le Havre Mann. Katowice erg e Luxembu heim Kosice Prague Karlsruh rg Rouen Regensb e Brn Metz Zili urg o na Pa Vienna Strasbou Bratislav Sttutgart rís rg a Munich Salzburg Wels/Lin Dijon z Györ Debrece Basel Tours n Innsbruc Graz k Budapest Amsterd am Birmingha m Southampt on Lyon Bordeau x Bilbao Porto/ Leixóes Aveiro Valladoli d Turin Narbon ne Zaragoza Madrid Venice Barcelon a Tarragon a Milan Vero na Padova Koper Novara Avign on Marseille Genova Bologna Ravenna Rijeka Murcia Córdoba Sevilla Antequ era/Bo badilla Timisoar a Vukobar Ploiesti Sulina Buchares Craiov t a Calafat Vid in Sof ia Florence Constanț a Ruse Burgas Plov diy Rome Napoles Bari Sines Zagr eb Ancona La Spezia Livorno Valencia Lisbon Trieste Brasov Arad Ljubljana Gioia Tauro Palermo Cartagen a Taranto Igoumeni tsa Catania Augusta Almería Patras Thesalon iki Athens/Pira eus Lefkosia Valetta Algeciras Limasol

Financial framework • Coordinate National budgetary options with EC support possibilities • Use of European Commission's Financing instruments Ø Ø Ø Grants Blending EFSI Do more with less! Mobility and Transport

Progress on the North Sea-Baltic Corridor Second Work Plan of the NSB Corridor • • • Mobility and Transport Updated analysis of the characteristics of the Corridor Update of the project list (total investment projected: 80 bn EUR) New chapter on capacity issues Bottlenecks in urban nodes Outlook on funding and financing sources and on "wider elements" (innovation, decarbonisation) to be further analysed

Progress on the North Sea-Baltic Corridor Funding and financing • CEF calls of 2014 and 2015 : € 2. 3 billion EU co-funding allocated to 19 NSB projects, as well as € 293 million EU grants to 18 projects also relevant for other Corridors. • The cohesion Member States on the Corridor – Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia –earmarked roughly € 9 billion from the ESI Funds for the development of the TEN-T core network until 2023, from which a significant part will benefit projects on the NSB Corridor • Several EFSI projects already signed or approved (Tallinn airport upgrade, Blankenburg Tunnel Rotterdam, Lithuanian Airports, Riga Transport Company) Mobility and Transport

Progress on the North Sea-Baltic Corridor Meetings and missions / collaborations • Since the last hearing in May 2015: 36 missions and 5 Corridor Forum meetings, which provided crucial input to the update of the Corridor Work Plan • Joint Working group with North Sea-Mediterranean Corridor on Ports and Inland Waterways in Liège on 3 May 2017 • Joint Working group with Baltic-Adriatic Corridor on Regions and Urban nodes planned in September 2017 • Several meetings with the "Friends of Rail Baltica" in the EP • Regional collaboration projects and cooperation with industry contributes to a lively economic corridor development Mobility and Transport

Progress on the North Sea-Baltic Corridor – main missing link Rail Baltica project implementation 1. 22 billion CEF co-funding allocated to Rail Baltica so far (EE-LV-LT-PL) Mobility and Transport

Thank you for your attention Mobility and Transport