East Hall under construction 1962 East Area Renovation

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
East Hall under construction - 1962 East Area Renovation Project Team meeting # 4

East Hall under construction - 1962 East Area Renovation Project Team meeting # 4 Beam Line Layout Johannes Bernhard / EN-EA, 18 -11 -2016

Beam Line Layout • Objectives • Beam parameters • Layout • Outlook / Studies

Beam Line Layout • Objectives • Beam parameters • Layout • Outlook / Studies Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Beam line layout objectives • Better cope with present and future physics requirements •

Beam line layout objectives • Better cope with present and future physics requirements • Higher top momenta • Higher acceptance (5 x higher transmission than present lines) • Improve reliability by removing splitter magnet • Two north targets (T 9 + T 10/11) for higher flexibility • T 9 for high purity electron and hadron beams • T 11 optimised for CLOUD operation Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Beam line layout objectives • Reduce primary zone size • minimise dose rates to

Beam line layout objectives • Reduce primary zone size • minimise dose rates to personnel • faster repair times by improving equipment accessibility irradia tions irradiati ons Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Primary beam / T 8 • Removed splitter • 3 destinations Synoptic • Target

Primary beam / T 8 • Removed splitter • 3 destinations Synoptic • Target A (T 9) • Target B (T 10/T 11) • T 8 (Irradiations) • F 61 dump destination to be included • Keep multi-target design Target Material Length Diameter (mm) Be 200 10 + Al case Electron enriched W 3 Al 100 10 Electron enriched Be 3 3 Al 200 10 Hadron 4 air - - Empty 5 AL 20 10 Hadron Head 1 2 Comments Parameter Value Proton beam momentum [Ge. V/c] 24 Maximum flux per PS spill 5 1011 Maximum # spills per super-cycle 6 Duration of super-cycle [s] 45. 6 Maximum # protons per second 6. 7 1010 Maximum number of days per year 200 Assumed efficiency 90% Maximum number of super-cycles per year 340, 000 Maximum number of protons per year 1. 0 1018 Minimum spot size [mm RMS] ~5 x 5 Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Beams T 9 / T 10 • Higher momenta up to 15 Ge. V/c

Beams T 9 / T 10 • Higher momenta up to 15 Ge. V/c in T 9, 12 Ge. V/c in T 10 • Flux ~106 particles per PS spill • Pure µ± beam available in both T 9/T 10 (stopper dumps) • Pure e± or h± beam available in T 9 (converter/absorber) e± µ± T 9 generic optics pure h± Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Beams T 9 / T 10 Parameter T 9 (new) T 10 (new) old

Beams T 9 / T 10 Parameter T 9 (new) T 10 (new) old T 9 50. 2 44. 7 54. 3 Max. beam momentum [Ge. V/c] 15 12 10 Momentum resolution [%] 0. 7 Max. momentum band [%] ± 15% ± 4 ± 5 ± 4. 8 ± 2. 8 ± 3 ± 4 0. 75, 0. 86 0. 92, 0. 58 1. 5, 2. 0 1. 6, 1. 5 Length (up to last beam element) [m] Horizontal acceptance [mrad] Vertical acceptance [mrad] Magnification at final focus (H, V) Typical RMS spot size [mm] for acceptance colls at ± 10 mm, Dp=± 1% Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016 0. 81, 0. 91 1. 5, 2. 0

Beam T 11 • keep/improve CLOUD beam parameters • 3. 6 Ge. V/c max.

Beam T 11 • keep/improve CLOUD beam parameters • 3. 6 Ge. V/c max. momentum • beam spot size 1. 6 m x 1. 6 m • improved acceptance (i. e. increase of rate) Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Future Layout T 11 CLOUD T 10 T 9 T 8 line IRRAD CHARM

Future Layout T 11 CLOUD T 10 T 9 T 8 line IRRAD CHARM Synoptic D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Extraction F 61 dump to be included D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni Johannes Bernhard, 18.

Extraction F 61 dump to be included D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Target Area Target B T 11 line Target A T 10 line T 9

Target Area Target B T 11 line Target A T 10 line T 9 line T 8 line D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Future Layout D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Future Layout D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Future Layout D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Future Layout D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Outlook and Studies • Beam line layout reflects present and future physics requirements •

Outlook and Studies • Beam line layout reflects present and future physics requirements • Studies for magnet apertures about to be completed, summary document in preparation • Example: Replacement of 2 MBPL/M 200 in T 9 by MCB possible M 200 MCB X X Y Y Open collimators Beam spot at T 9 experimental area • Small (acceptable) losses for very open momentum slit (dp/p > 5% setting) • No losses for standard operation Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Outlook and Studies • Beam line layout reflects present and future physics requirements •

Outlook and Studies • Beam line layout reflects present and future physics requirements • Studies for magnet apertures about to be completed, summary document in preparation • Studies completed for beam stoppers / stopper dumps • Typical beam profile on T 9 stopper dump for open collimators Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Outlook and Studies • Beam line layout reflects present and future physics requirements •

Outlook and Studies • Beam line layout reflects present and future physics requirements • Studies for magnet apertures about to be completed, summary document in preparation • Studies completed for beam stoppers / stopper dumps • Integration ongoing, next iteration of beatch files • Example: Clash BHZ 3 (T 8) and QDE 5 (F 62), resolved Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Outlook and Studies • Beam line layout reflects present and future physics requirements •

Outlook and Studies • Beam line layout reflects present and future physics requirements • Studies for magnet apertures about to be completed, summary document in preparation • Studies completed for beam stoppers / stopper dumps • Integration ongoing, next iteration of beatch files • Example: Layout database and beatch file update Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Thanks for your attention! Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016

Thanks for your attention! Johannes Bernhard, 18. 11. 2016