East African Rift Rwenzori Whats TorresAcosta et al

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation

East African Rift Rwenzori

East African Rift Rwenzori

What’s Torres-Acosta et al. objective? How can we relate last week’s paper to this

What’s Torres-Acosta et al. objective? How can we relate last week’s paper to this Torres-Acosta et al. ’s paper?

Determining basin-wide erosion rates using CRN (10 Be, 26 Al) Cosmic rays Concentration of

Determining basin-wide erosion rates using CRN (10 Be, 26 Al) Cosmic rays Concentration of nuclides (Ni) and erosion rate (ɛ) are inversely related: Λ attenuation length (~m) Pi production rate ρ is the density of the eroding material e is erosion rate in the catchment But, they also decay: Assume 0 production post deposition Ni, E Ni Conceptual model by Kevin Norton 2010 td (e. g. , Balco and Stone 2005)

Sample sites for CRN What‘s their catchment criteria? and why?

Sample sites for CRN What‘s their catchment criteria? and why?

Methods • Erosion rate: – CRN-10 Be • Vegetation: – Enhance Vegetation Index (EVI)

Methods • Erosion rate: – CRN-10 Be • Vegetation: – Enhance Vegetation Index (EVI) – Vegetation Continuous Field (VCF) – What are the differences between the two data sets?

Huete et al. 2002

Huete et al. 2002

Figures 1&2

Figures 1&2

Supplementary figures • Why do they only use part of the catchment for topography,

Supplementary figures • Why do they only use part of the catchment for topography, climate and vegetation data?

Methods • Erosion rate: – CRN-10 Be • Vegetation: – Enhance Vegetation Index (EVI)

Methods • Erosion rate: – CRN-10 Be • Vegetation: – Enhance Vegetation Index (EVI) – Vegetation Continuous Field (VCF) • What is the issue about comparing the denudation rates with vegetation data?

Figure 3 and 4

Figure 3 and 4

Figure 5 Important point they make with this graph?

Figure 5 Important point they make with this graph?

Figure 6 ● What are the graphs comparing? ● Ignoring the grey lines in

Figure 6 ● What are the graphs comparing? ● Ignoring the grey lines in 6 A, What do they conclude? ● What do they see in Fig. 6 A? ● How do they go about to determine the cause of the two scaling relations?

Figure 7 ● What is each graph showing? ● What do they determine for

Figure 7 ● What is each graph showing? ● What do they determine for the potential cause of the two scaling relationships? ● What do they rely on to make this interpretation?

Changing climate conditions - time scale integration • How to they account for the

Changing climate conditions - time scale integration • How to they account for the fact that the modern vegetation does not capture the time-integrated effects of vegetation changes? • How do they connect denudation rates with vegetation changes? • Is vegetation cover an important factor in denudation rate?

Concluding comments? Do you agree with their conclusion?

Concluding comments? Do you agree with their conclusion?

Riebe and Granger 2013

Riebe and Granger 2013