Dyspnea in COPD New Insights Denis E ODonnell

  • Slides: 79
Download presentation
Dyspnea in COPD : New Insights Denis E. O’Donnell Respiratory Investigation Unit Queen’s University

Dyspnea in COPD : New Insights Denis E. O’Donnell Respiratory Investigation Unit Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario Canada

Outline • • • Mechanics in COPD during exercise Correlations with dyspnea Qualitative aspects

Outline • • • Mechanics in COPD during exercise Correlations with dyspnea Qualitative aspects Interactions between Mechanics and Drive Neuro-mechanical Dissociation

Breathlessness

Breathlessness

Dyspnea in COPD: Neurophysiological Mechanisms CENTRAL (Corollary Discharge): ¨ motor drive (inspiratory effort) -

Dyspnea in COPD: Neurophysiological Mechanisms CENTRAL (Corollary Discharge): ¨ motor drive (inspiratory effort) - cortical ¨ reflexic drive (chemical, neural) - medullary PERIPHERAL (Afferent Activity): ¨Altered vagal afferent activity (stretch, A-fibres) ¨Altered chest wall afferent activity (muscle spindles, Golgi tendon organs, joint receptors) INTEGRATED CENTRAL-PERIPHERAL: ¨Neuromechanical dissociation

COPD Normal PL . V Reduced recoil Reduced tethering Increased airways resistance Expiratory flow

COPD Normal PL . V Reduced recoil Reduced tethering Increased airways resistance Expiratory flow limitation

Exp. flow (L/s) . Normal Vmax COPD . Vmax 4 2 Palv (cm. H

Exp. flow (L/s) . Normal Vmax COPD . Vmax 4 2 Palv (cm. H 2 O) -30 -20 . -10 10 2 MIF . 4 6 Insp. Flow (L/s) 20 30 40

TLC MVV Health IC VC EELV RV TLC MVV VC EELV RV IC COPD

TLC MVV Health IC VC EELV RV TLC MVV VC EELV RV IC COPD

IC TLC IC EILV EELV IRV VT EELV Normal COPD

IC TLC IC EILV EELV IRV VT EELV Normal COPD

age 40 -50 50 -55 55 -60 60 -70

age 40 -50 50 -55 55 -60 60 -70

To the COPD patient, this is a breathtaking view.

To the COPD patient, this is a breathtaking view.

Normals (n=25) COPD (n=105) TLC minimal IRV EILV VT IC EELV IC= -0. 37±

Normals (n=25) COPD (n=105) TLC minimal IRV EILV VT IC EELV IC= -0. 37± 0. 04 L VC / RV [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM 2001]

Distribution of Magnitude of Change in IC during Exercise DH COPD n = 105

Distribution of Magnitude of Change in IC during Exercise DH COPD n = 105 FEV 1. 0 = 37 % predicted peak VO 2 = 13 ml/kg/min peak VE = 33 L/min n = 25 Normal FEV 1. 0 = 106 % predicted peak VO 2 = 31 ml/kg/min peak VE = 74 L/min -1. 5 -1 -0. 5 0 IC (L) 0. 5 1

Determinants of Dynamic Hyperinflation during Exercise in COPD ¨Extent of expiratory flow limitation ¨Ventilatory

Determinants of Dynamic Hyperinflation during Exercise in COPD ¨Extent of expiratory flow limitation ¨Ventilatory demand ¨Breathing pattern ¨Resting level of hyperinflation

Pressure–Volume Relationships at Rest and During Exercise COPD Normal PL Pw VT IC PRS

Pressure–Volume Relationships at Rest and During Exercise COPD Normal PL Pw VT IC PRS VT PRS IC

Negative Effects of Dynamic Hyperinflation Elastic / threshold loads ¨ Inspiratory muscle weakness ¨

Negative Effects of Dynamic Hyperinflation Elastic / threshold loads ¨ Inspiratory muscle weakness ¨ } Pes/P CLdyn VD/VT Pa. CO 2 Further DH Reduced VT expansion tachypnea ¨ Regional expiratory flow limitation } ¨ Imax “effort” ¨ Early ventilatory limitation to exercise ¨ Exertional dyspnea

Dyspnea & Unsatisfied Inspiration.

Dyspnea & Unsatisfied Inspiration.

Exercise Responses in COPD [O’Donnell et al. AJRCCM 1997] Operational Lung Volumes Respiratory Effort

Exercise Responses in COPD [O’Donnell et al. AJRCCM 1997] Operational Lung Volumes Respiratory Effort 60 TLC COPD 50 120 IC COPD 100 IC 80 Normal 60 40 Pes / Plmax (%) Long Volume (% pred TLC) 140 Normal 40 30 20 10 0 20 40 60 Ventilation (L/min) 80

Exercise Responses in COPD (cont’d) O’Donnell et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med

Exercise Responses in COPD (cont’d) O’Donnell et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997 Neuromechanical Dissociation 7 25 COPD 20 15 10 Normal 5 0 0 20 40 60 Ventilation (L/min) 80 Dyspnea (Borg Scale) Pes / VT ratio (cm. H 2 O/L) 30 Exertional Dyspnea 6 COPD 5 Normal 4 3 2 1 0 0 20 40 60 Ventilation (L/min) 80

[Sinderby et al. AJRCCM 2001]

[Sinderby et al. AJRCCM 2001]

Inter-relationships at a Standardized Level of Exercise [O’Donnell et al. Am J Respir Crit

Inter-relationships at a Standardized Level of Exercise [O’Donnell et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997] Dyspnea (Borg) r=0. 86 r=0. 69 p<0. 001 Pes/PImax : VT/VC ratio r=0. 78 p<0. 001 EELV / TLC

Health Effort: Displacement Ratio Quality of Exertional Dyspnea exercise rest Selection Frequency (%)

Health Effort: Displacement Ratio Quality of Exertional Dyspnea exercise rest Selection Frequency (%)

COPD Effort: Displacement Ratio Quality of Exertional Dyspnea exercise * * oad l. L

COPD Effort: Displacement Ratio Quality of Exertional Dyspnea exercise * * oad l. L ica an ch Me VE rest * ITL Selection Frequency (%) *p<0. 05 vs. Normal

Neuromechanical Dissociation Corollary Discharge Feedback Neuromechanical Coupling Reflexic Drive Motor Output Mechanical Response

Neuromechanical Dissociation Corollary Discharge Feedback Neuromechanical Coupling Reflexic Drive Motor Output Mechanical Response

Purpose Ø To partition the effects of changes in IC (EELV) and IRV (EILV)

Purpose Ø To partition the effects of changes in IC (EELV) and IRV (EILV) on dyspnea during acute hyperinflation induced by exercise or by a breathing circuit which allows us to examine the effects of IC in relative isolation.

Mechanical Hyperinflation VC Baseline +0. 5 L +1. 0 L A breathing circuit was

Mechanical Hyperinflation VC Baseline +0. 5 L +1. 0 L A breathing circuit was modified from that of Fessler et al. (Chest 1995; 108: 432 -40). This closed circuit induces an increase in EELV (decrease in IC) by controlling the volume at which the expiratory solenoid value closes.

Dyspnea & Effort

Dyspnea & Effort

Demand-Capacity Imbalance

Demand-Capacity Imbalance

Load- Capacity Imbalance: Dyspnea Correlations in COPD • • Ve/MVV Pes/PI max Vt /

Load- Capacity Imbalance: Dyspnea Correlations in COPD • • Ve/MVV Pes/PI max Vt / IC Pes/PImax: Vt/IC ratio

Breathlessness and Exercise in Patients with Cardiorespiratory Disease Breathlessness (Borg Scale) [Leblanc et al.

Breathlessness and Exercise in Patients with Cardiorespiratory Disease Breathlessness (Borg Scale) [Leblanc et al. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 133: 21 -25] . Pmus/MIP • VI • VT/VC • TI/TTOT • F

Maximum Voluntary Ventilation in COPD Pes/PImax = 60% Ventilation = 45 L/min IC =

Maximum Voluntary Ventilation in COPD Pes/PImax = 60% Ventilation = 45 L/min IC = -0. 8 L Dyspnea (Borg) = 1 "very slight" MVV TLC Flow IC IC Volume EELV IC IC RV

Proportional Assist Ventilation [O’Donnell et al. AJRCCM 1997] Control * PAV *p<0. 05 significant

Proportional Assist Ventilation [O’Donnell et al. AJRCCM 1997] Control * PAV *p<0. 05 significant difference at isotime * PAV

Dyspnea & the Inspiratory Threshold Load

Dyspnea & the Inspiratory Threshold Load

Normal COPD Inspiratory Threshold Load “Stokes’ Sign” Decreased Muscle Strength

Normal COPD Inspiratory Threshold Load “Stokes’ Sign” Decreased Muscle Strength

CPAP during Exercise in COPD [O’Donnell et al. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988] C

CPAP during Exercise in COPD [O’Donnell et al. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988] C 1 C 2 CPAP

Acute Bronchoconstriction in Asthma [Lougheed et al. AJRCCM 1995] Maximal Bronchoprovocation Flow (L/s) Baseline

Acute Bronchoconstriction in Asthma [Lougheed et al. AJRCCM 1995] Maximal Bronchoprovocation Flow (L/s) Baseline IC Volume (L) FEV 1 = 97 % predicted Dyspnea = Borg 0 "none" IC Volume (L) FEV 1 = 44 %predicted Dyspnea = Borg 5 "severe" IC = - 1. 4 L ITL = + 7 cm. H 2 O Pes = + 24 % PImax

Ventilatory Assistance during Bronchoconstriction [Lougheed et al. AJRCCM 1995] Pes = -7 %PImax PEEPi

Ventilatory Assistance during Bronchoconstriction [Lougheed et al. AJRCCM 1995] Pes = -7 %PImax PEEPi = -7. 9 cm. H 2 O PEEPi = -1. 6 cm. H 2 O Reduction in Dyspnea ( Borg Scale) CPAP IPAP * * *

Dyspnea, Mechanical Restriction & Increased Drive

Dyspnea, Mechanical Restriction & Increased Drive

Normal COPD VOLUME (%pred TLC) (n=25) (n=105) 140 120 IRV 100 IC 80 60

Normal COPD VOLUME (%pred TLC) (n=25) (n=105) 140 120 IRV 100 IC 80 60 IC VT 100 80 60 40 40 EELV 20 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 VENTILATION (L/min) O’Donnell et al. AJRCCM 2001; 164: 770 -777. 80

Neuromechanical Coupling / Dissociation normal COPD ILD

Neuromechanical Coupling / Dissociation normal COPD ILD

Chest Wall Restriction & Dead Space Loading in Normal Men [O’Donnell et al. J

Chest Wall Restriction & Dead Space Loading in Normal Men [O’Donnell et al. J Appl Physiol 2000] CWS+DS CWS DS Control CWS = chest strap to 60% of control VC DS = 600 m. L of added dead space DS Control CWS+DS CWS

* * Control CWS+DS *p<0. 05

* * Control CWS+DS *p<0. 05

Dyspnea-IRV relationship during exercise in healthy, young males (n=12) Control DS CWS+DS TLC O’Donnell

Dyspnea-IRV relationship during exercise in healthy, young males (n=12) Control DS CWS+DS TLC O’Donnell et al. J Appl Physiol 2000

Reducing Lung Hyperinflation Bronchodilators ¨ Reduce Ventilation: ¨ • Oxygen • Exercise Training Deflationary

Reducing Lung Hyperinflation Bronchodilators ¨ Reduce Ventilation: ¨ • Oxygen • Exercise Training Deflationary breathing techniques ¨ CPAP / PS ¨ Volume reduction surgery ¨

Treatment Strategies Bronchodilators

Treatment Strategies Bronchodilators

Dyspnea Relief in Response to Bronchodilators [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM 1998] *p<0. 05 pre

Dyspnea Relief in Response to Bronchodilators [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM 1998] *p<0. 05 pre vs. post-ipratropium bromide (IB)

Effects of Salmeterol 50 g on the "Dyspnea Threshold"

Effects of Salmeterol 50 g on the "Dyspnea Threshold"

Post-Dose Differences in Pulmonary Function +8 cm. H 2 O +0. 52 L +0.

Post-Dose Differences in Pulmonary Function +8 cm. H 2 O +0. 52 L +0. 40 L +0. 34 L * * +3% FRC FEV 1 FVC RV IC MIP -0. 18 L * -0. 58 L * L -0. 58 * p<0. 05 salmeterol versus placebo TLC @FRC

Operating Lung Volumes during Exercise Normal COPD pre-dose post-dose TLC IRV VT EELV IC

Operating Lung Volumes during Exercise Normal COPD pre-dose post-dose TLC IRV VT EELV IC EELV

Placebo TLC BD Ø For a given acute change in IC during exercise, dyspnea

Placebo TLC BD Ø For a given acute change in IC during exercise, dyspnea intensity was reduced after bronchodilators (BD). Ø Dyspnea-IRV relationships were constant (p=0. 3).

Changes at a standardized time during exercise with salmeterol n=23 r= -0. 88 p<0.

Changes at a standardized time during exercise with salmeterol n=23 r= -0. 88 p<0. 0005

Changes in Response to Salmeterol 50 µg Peak VO 2 (%pred) r=0. 62 r=0.

Changes in Response to Salmeterol 50 µg Peak VO 2 (%pred) r=0. 62 r=0. 75 p<0. 0005 Resting IC (%pred) Peak VT r=0. 75 p<0. 0005 (%pred VC)

TLC Placebo BD Ø For a given acute change in IC during mechanical HI,

TLC Placebo BD Ø For a given acute change in IC during mechanical HI, dyspnea intensity was reduced after bronchodilators (BD). Ø Dyspnea-IRV relationships were constant (p=0. 8).

150 25 Tidal Pes / VT (cm. H 20/L) Lung Volume (%pred TLC) Improvements

150 25 Tidal Pes / VT (cm. H 20/L) Lung Volume (%pred TLC) Improvements in Respiratory Mechanics during Exercise in Response to Tiotropium [BI Trial 205. 231] IC 100 50 20 15 Post-dose 10 normal 5 0 0 – 30 Pre-dose 0 Pleural Pressure (cm. H 20) 50 0 20 40 60 80 100 VO 2 (% predicted max)

Tiotropium reduces respiratory effort and increases the tidal volume response during constant-load exercise in

Tiotropium reduces respiratory effort and increases the tidal volume response during constant-load exercise in COPD [O’Donnell et al. 2004] tiotropium placebo

EFL VE DH Pst r VD/VT Pa. O 2 p. H behavioural neural Dyspnea

EFL VE DH Pst r VD/VT Pa. O 2 p. H behavioural neural Dyspnea Exercise Intolerance VRS Bronchodilators Oxygen Exercise Training

Treatment Strategies O 2 Therapy

Treatment Strategies O 2 Therapy

Responses to Oxygen during Exercise [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM 2001] RA O 2 **

Responses to Oxygen during Exercise [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM 2001] RA O 2 ** isotime Exercise time (min) *p<0. 05, **p<0. 01 difference at isotime

Responses to Oxygen during Exercise [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM 2001] TLC IRV* RA EILV*

Responses to Oxygen during Exercise [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM 2001] TLC IRV* RA EILV* O 2 RA VT EELV* *p<0. 05 significant difference at isotime * O 2

Exponential Relationship: Borg/VE Severe COPD Moderate COPD 1. 7 Normal Mechanical Load 0. 6

Exponential Relationship: Borg/VE Severe COPD Moderate COPD 1. 7 Normal Mechanical Load 0. 6 } 3

Summary • Exertional dyspnea in COPD is associated with acute-on-chronic Hyperinflation • Unsatisfied inspiration

Summary • Exertional dyspnea in COPD is associated with acute-on-chronic Hyperinflation • Unsatisfied inspiration is an important qualitative dimension • Acute mechanical DH, not associated with volume restriction, or increased drive, is well tolerated in COPD

Summary (ctd). • The dyspnea-IRV relation remains constant despite large variation in pa. O

Summary (ctd). • The dyspnea-IRV relation remains constant despite large variation in pa. O 2, pa. CO 2, Ve breathing pattern, Pes/PI max or shifts in baseline mechanics. • • Inability to appropriately expand Vt in response to increased central drive may lead to the perception of “unsatisfied inspiration”

Clinical Implications • Measures that delay the attenuation of IRV during exercise will relieve

Clinical Implications • Measures that delay the attenuation of IRV during exercise will relieve dyspnea by enhancing Neuro-mechanical coupling.

Neuromechanical Dissociation Corollary Discharge Feedback Neuromechanical Coupling Reflexic Drive Motor Output Mechanical Response

Neuromechanical Dissociation Corollary Discharge Feedback Neuromechanical Coupling Reflexic Drive Motor Output Mechanical Response

Effects of Salmeterol 50 g on the "Dyspnea Threshold"

Effects of Salmeterol 50 g on the "Dyspnea Threshold"

Exercise: Operating Lung Volumes • Placebo IRV • BD TLC EILV VT EELV IC

Exercise: Operating Lung Volumes • Placebo IRV • BD TLC EILV VT EELV IC

TLC Placebo BD Ø For a given acute change in IC during mechanical HI,

TLC Placebo BD Ø For a given acute change in IC during mechanical HI, dyspnea intensity was reduced after bronchodilators (BD). Ø Dyspnea-IRV relationships were constant (p=0. 8).

Neuromechanical Coupling / Dissociation normal COPD ILD

Neuromechanical Coupling / Dissociation normal COPD ILD

Responses to a Bronchodilator: Summary Ø Bronchodilator-induced reductions in baseline lung hyperinflation delayed the

Responses to a Bronchodilator: Summary Ø Bronchodilator-induced reductions in baseline lung hyperinflation delayed the onset of intolerable dyspnea during acute hyperinflation by delaying IRV reduction to a critical value.

* * * * Values are means ±SEM. *p<0. 05 significant difference between salmeterol

* * * * Values are means ±SEM. *p<0. 05 significant difference between salmeterol and placebo.

Subject Characteristics (n=8) Gender Age, years Body mass index, kg/m 2 5 M: 3

Subject Characteristics (n=8) Gender Age, years Body mass index, kg/m 2 5 M: 3 F 56 ± 4 29. 5 ± 1. 3 FEV 1, % predicted 53 ± 3 FEV 1/FVC, % 49 ± 4 TLC, % predicted 112 ± 5 FRC, % predicted 136 ± 9 IC, % predicted 86 ± 5 Values are means ± SEM.

150 25 Tidal Pes / VT (cm. H 20/L) Lung Volume (%pred TLC) Improvements

150 25 Tidal Pes / VT (cm. H 20/L) Lung Volume (%pred TLC) Improvements in Respiratory Mechanics during Exercise in Response to Tiotropium [BI Trial 205. 231] IC 100 50 20 15 Post-dose 10 normal 5 0 0 – 30 Pre-dose 0 Pleural Pressure (cm. H 20) 50 0 20 40 60 80 100 VO 2 (% predicted max)

Reducing EELV in COPD ¨ Reduce bronchomotor tone: - Anticholinergics - 2 -agonists ¨

Reducing EELV in COPD ¨ Reduce bronchomotor tone: - Anticholinergics - 2 -agonists ¨ Reduce mucosal inflammation / edema ¨ Improve clearance of secretions ¨ Increase lung recoil pressure (PL) ¨ Breathing pattern alterations: - Voluntary TE - Reduce drive (opiates, O 2)

Exercise Hypercapnia in COPD NR R R NR NR R [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM

Exercise Hypercapnia in COPD NR R R NR NR R [O'Donnell et al. AJRCCM 2002]

Operating Lung Volumes during Exercise TLC R }V NR R T “minimal IRV” NR

Operating Lung Volumes during Exercise TLC R }V NR R T “minimal IRV” NR normals Ventilation during exercise was limited by mechanical constraints on tidal volume expansion in both R and NR, i. e. , by dynamic hyperinflation from below and by the TLC envelope from above.

William Wilde and William Stokes sharing a bottle of beer.

William Wilde and William Stokes sharing a bottle of beer.

Regardless of varying Pa. O 2 and Pa. CO 2, the relationship between exertional

Regardless of varying Pa. O 2 and Pa. CO 2, the relationship between exertional dyspnea intensity and IRV was constant. TLC R = CO 2 retainers; NR = non-retainers; RA = room air.

Neuromechanical Dissociation Corollary Discharge Feedback Neuromechanical Coupling Reflexic Drive Motor Output Mechanical Response

Neuromechanical Dissociation Corollary Discharge Feedback Neuromechanical Coupling Reflexic Drive Motor Output Mechanical Response

Exercise: Operating Lung Volumes • Placebo IRV • BD TLC EILV VT EELV IC

Exercise: Operating Lung Volumes • Placebo IRV • BD TLC EILV VT EELV IC