DUNE DAQ Consortium Organization Giovanna Lehmann Miotto DUNE

DUNE DAQ Consortium Organization Giovanna Lehmann Miotto DUNE DAQ IB Meeting April 30 th 2019

Important things first • A big THANK YOU to Dave and Georgia for having led the DAQ consortium through its initial phases - We have a team - We have institutions and funding agencies committed to the project - We have draft chapters for the DUNE TDR • The Proto. DUNEs are a very important playground also for the DAQ 2 - DP getting ready for commissioning and operations with detector - SP taking data continuously and prototyping DAQ software triggering - There will be Proto. DUNEs in 2021/2022 - Commitment from all institutions for operations and support is expected April 30 th, 2019 GLM, DAQ IB Meeting

DUNE Planning • DUNE TDR: July 2019 Review and prepare for endorsement; institutional responsibilities! • Proto. DUNE (SP) Running: 2019 • Proto. DUNE (DP) Running: 2019 -2020 Support and operations • Start of Proto. DUNE-II (SP) Installation: March 2021 • Start of Proto. DUNE-II (DP) Installation: March 2022 Support and operations • South Dakota Logistics Warehouse Available: April 2022 • Beneficial Occupancy of Cavern 1/CUC: October 2022 3 April 30 th, 2019 GLM, DAQ IB Meeting

DUNE Planning • CUC Counting Room Accessible: April 2023 Start infrastructure and DAQ installation • Top of Far Detector #1 Cryostat Accessible: January 2024 • Start of Far Detector #1 TPC Installation: August 2024 • End of Far Detector #1 TPC Installation: May 2025 Cold-box like support Full DAQ for 1 module • Top of Far Detector #2 Accessible: January 2025 • Start of Far Detector #2 TPC Installation: August 2025 • End of Far Detector #2 TPC Installation: May 2026 4 April 30 th, 2019 GLM, DAQ IB Meeting Full DAQ for 2 modules

DAQ Planning • Tight schedule for R&D, design, implementation in parallel with operations and support (Proto. DUNEs) - We are NOT going to have an operations team separated from the development effort • Everybody is requested to contribute to all phases of the project - The biggest challenge for the DUNE DAQ is ensuring very high data taking efficiency for a large and complex system • DAQ consortium is organized around working groups - Work organization is changing after the conceptual design phase - Now focus more on detailed design and development 5 April 30 th, 2019 GLM, DAQ IB Meeting

DAQ Consortium Integration & support coordination Upstream DAQ WG Dataflow WG Resources coordination SW/FW coordination Data Selection WG Physics Performance WG 6 April 30 th, 2019 Technical lead Consortium lead Control Configuration Monitoring WG Facility WG GLM, DAQ IB Meeting Data Monitoring WG

D. Newbold UK R. Sipos CERN Resources coordination Integration & support coordination A. Thea UK Technical lead SW/FW coordination G. Lehmann Miotto CERN Consortium lead DAQ Institutes Board Experiment management ? Facility A. Habig USA B. King USA Data Selection Upstream DAQ G. Barr UK G. Karagiorgi USA J. Brooke UK K. Hennessy UK K. Biery USA P. Rodrigues UK Timing & Sync Application framework Dataflow Racks, power, cooling Trigger candidates Cabling Data I/O Networks Data filtering Data buffer Online computing Module level trigger Control rooms Physics Performance External trigger I/O Data processing CCM ? J. Novy Cz Run Control DQM receiver Supervision DQ algorithms Process mgmt Data format Resource mgmt Results management Event builder Access mgmt DQ assessment Data storage Configuration Operational monitoring Simulation Validation Inter process communication Performance User Interfaces Calibration April 30 th, 2019 ? ? Data communication J. Klein USA S. Peeters UK 7 Data Monitoring GLM, DAQ IB Meeting Visualization

DAQ Consortium Resources Integration & support coordination Upstream DAQ WG Dataflow WG Resources coordination Technical lead SW/FW coordination Data Selection WG Control Configuration Monitoring WG Physics Performance WG 8 April 30 th, 2019 Consortium lead GLM, DAQ IB Meeting Facility WG Data Monitoring WG

The DAQ Institutes Board • Important decisions involving resources require the IB endorsement - It is the CL responsibility to ensure that any issue is communicated with sufficient notice for you to check with your respective funding agencies • Official documents shall be endorsed by the IB before release - e. g. TDR DAQ chapters • The CL reports to the IB - Project status and planning - Resources concerns • We propose to nominate an IB chair - Call IB meetings, define agendas, follow up on institutional issues - Frank Filthaut (NL) has agreed to serve as first IB chair 9 April 30 th, 2019 GLM, DAQ IB Meeting

Summary • The DAQ project is moving from a brain storming and conceptual design phase into detailed design - Control, configuration and monitoring areas require substantial additional resources of skilled software engineers • Those areas are ideal also for IT students to work on challenging tasks - We are now carefully watching the “Facility” area to make revised cost and effort estimates • Commitments from institutes and funding agencies will be required for the whole of DUNE soon (part of TDR approval process) - At present the aspirational effort communicated for the DAQ is very scattered (+30 institutions) and not well distributed over activities • We will need your help on this, to demonstrate that the DAQ project is sound - Core costing projections seem to be fairly well covered (if all funding proposals get positive response) 10 April 30 th, 2019 GLM, DAQ IB Meeting