DRAPP 2012 Agenda Project Recap Lessons Learned DRCOG

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
DRAPP 2012

DRAPP 2012

Agenda Project Recap Lessons Learned (DRCOG) Results from the Survey Discussion of Final Thoughts

Agenda Project Recap Lessons Learned (DRCOG) Results from the Survey Discussion of Final Thoughts for 2012 Discussion of the Upcoming 2014 Project Lessons Learned (Kucera) (11: 30 to 12: 00)

2012 Stats Who’s Involved? 50 Partners 8 DRCOG Member Counties (only Arapahoe abstains) 27

2012 Stats Who’s Involved? 50 Partners 8 DRCOG Member Counties (only Arapahoe abstains) 27 DRCOG Member Cities 15 Regional Partners (e. g. RTD, CDOT, USGS, United Power) What’s the extent? 7, 000 square miles

2012 Success Image Quality = High Flights = On time, good weather, “to spec”

2012 Success Image Quality = High Flights = On time, good weather, “to spec” Cost = Low compared to previous years Participation = On the high end WMS = Well-received “stop gap” solution (Final on 12/20) Deliverables = 76% by last deliverable date (1/15)

WMS Stats 80% of partners use it frequently

WMS Stats 80% of partners use it frequently

Lessons Learned Clarifications in the Statement of Work: Better explanation of where vendors should

Lessons Learned Clarifications in the Statement of Work: Better explanation of where vendors should pay close attention for tall buildings (building lean). Draw more attention to the delivery/distribution responsibilities of both vendors. Simplify the deliverables. Process Improvements: Obtain Imagery and DAT approval at the SAME board meeting in December/January. February is a little late. Reevaluate license agreement language to include WMS.

Survey Results 34% response rate Overall experience = 59% Very Good; 41% Good DRCOG

Survey Results 34% response rate Overall experience = 59% Very Good; 41% Good DRCOG project management = 76% Very Good; 24% Good Cost = 94% Reasonable; 6% Somewhat high

Survey Results Image Quality= 76% Very Good, 18% Good, 6% Fair Communication= 71% Very

Survey Results Image Quality= 76% Very Good, 18% Good, 6% Fair Communication= 71% Very Good, 29% Good Delivery Times= 41% Very Good, 41% Good, 12% Fair, 6% Poor

Survey Results Interest in Add-ons (ranked): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Permanent WMS LIDAR

Survey Results Interest in Add-ons (ranked): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Permanent WMS LIDAR Acquisition Planimetric Features Web Coverage Service Other: Impervious Service

Discussion

Discussion

Comments on 2012?

Comments on 2012?

Who ordered which projection? SP CO Central, HARN (US Survey Feet) SP CO Central,

Who ordered which projection? SP CO Central, HARN (US Survey Feet) SP CO Central, NAD 83 (US Survey Feet) SP CO North, HARN (US Survey Feet) SP CO North, NAD 83 (US Survey Feet) UTM Z 13 North, NAD 83 (Meters) 8 24 10 5 3 Could we standardize? Can you project on-the-fly with Arc. Map?

What formats were ordered? Compressed Geo. TIFF Uncompressed Geo. TIFF JPG 2000 Mr. SID

What formats were ordered? Compressed Geo. TIFF Uncompressed Geo. TIFF JPG 2000 Mr. SID 3 band Mr. SID 4 band 6 21 27 15 4 Can we standardize? Are all these formats necessary? Does a permanent WMS or WCS change the need for certain formats?

Permanent WCS If we had a permanent WCS, would you consider not ordering imagery

Permanent WCS If we had a permanent WCS, would you consider not ordering imagery for the entire project area?

Comments on 2014?

Comments on 2014?

LIDAR How much would it cost? What are our options? What could we get

LIDAR How much would it cost? What are our options? What could we get from it? Can you post-process by yourself?

Next Meeting August 28 th Gather requirements for DRAPP 2014 Form the RFP review

Next Meeting August 28 th Gather requirements for DRAPP 2014 Form the RFP review and vendor interview subcommittee

Kucera’s Lessons Learned

Kucera’s Lessons Learned

For more information, contact Ashley Summers at asummers@drcog. org or 303 -480 -6746.

For more information, contact Ashley Summers at asummers@drcog. org or 303 -480 -6746.