Dr Gerald Craddock Centre for Excellence in Universal

  • Slides: 44
Download presentation
Dr Gerald Craddock Centre for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD) National Disability Authority (NDA)

Dr Gerald Craddock Centre for Excellence in Universal Design (CEUD) National Disability Authority (NDA) Dublin Ireland www. universaldesign. ie University of Pittsburgh Accessibility in the Context of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Transatlantic Perspective June 12 -13 2009

"Measuring Progress of e. Accessibility in Europe" (known as the 'Me. AC' study). The

"Measuring Progress of e. Accessibility in Europe" (known as the 'Me. AC' study). The study commissioned by the European Commission in 2006 as a follow-up to the e. Accessibility Communication of 2005 The aim To provide an evidence-base to support the future development of EU policy in the e. Accessibility field. The full report including annexes is available at: http: //ec. europa. eu/information_society/activities/einclusion/index_en. htm

Me. AC Reports 07, 08 Major data gathering programme was implemented to compile the

Me. AC Reports 07, 08 Major data gathering programme was implemented to compile the necessary information for this purpose, including: · 1) survey of the policy situation in relation to e. Accessibility in each of the Member States and in selected comparison countries (Australia, Canada, United States) · 2)measurement of the status of e. Accessibility in each of these countries on a common set of selected key Indicators · 3) surveys of key stakeholders (ICT industry, user organisations, and public procurement officials). Dataset the largest and most representative information on the e. Accessibility field in Europe and internationally that has been available anywhere in the world to date –Benchmarking e. Accessibility!!!!!!

The spectrum of relevant ICT technologies and services Me. AC Report Nov 08

The spectrum of relevant ICT technologies and services Me. AC Report Nov 08

Me. AC Report • Results not good: Surprise!!!! – e. Accessibility “Deficit” – e.

Me. AC Report • Results not good: Surprise!!!! – e. Accessibility “Deficit” – e. Accessibility “Gap” – e. Accessibility “Patchwork”

Image courtesy: Raph de Rooij - web interface quality specialist, www. webguidelines. nl

Image courtesy: Raph de Rooij - web interface quality specialist, www. webguidelines. nl

Examples of Deficit in Europe on e. Accessibility • ·Text relay services (essential for

Examples of Deficit in Europe on e. Accessibility • ·Text relay services (essential for deaf and speech impaired people) are only • • available in one-half of the Member States; emergency services are directly accessible by text telephone in only seven Member States ·Mobile operators in only seven Member States provide dedicated information for customers with disabilities on their websites ·On average, less than one-third of national language broadcasts of main public broadcasters in Europe were provided with subtitling (for deaf people) in 2006; there is wide variability (from 95% to none) in the amount of subtitling across individual countries ·key government web sites in the Member States meet the accepted minimum international standards on accessibility (12, 5% passed automated testing and only 5, 3% passed both automatic and manual examination) key commercial/sectoral web sites (e. g. railways, TV, newspapers, retail banking) providing this minimum level of accessibility is even lower (only 3, 9% passed automated testing while not a single site passed both automatic and manual testing)

Implementation “GAP” – Europe - CA, Aus, USA

Implementation “GAP” – Europe - CA, Aus, USA

The Policy “GAP” – Between Europe and Canada, USA and Australia

The Policy “GAP” – Between Europe and Canada, USA and Australia

Pathwork across all Countries – White Spaces = No Implementation/Policy

Pathwork across all Countries – White Spaces = No Implementation/Policy

Ireland policy Progress of e. Accessibility in Ireland Policy and Implemtation Impact Ireland

Ireland policy Progress of e. Accessibility in Ireland Policy and Implemtation Impact Ireland

Overall e. Accessibility Policy Scores

Overall e. Accessibility Policy Scores

Overall e. Accessibility Policy Scores Ireland Score

Overall e. Accessibility Policy Scores Ireland Score

The e. Accessibility Implementation 'Gap' Ireland

The e. Accessibility Implementation 'Gap' Ireland

Why Ireland? ?

Why Ireland? ?

BC

BC

Strategy For Equality 95 • People with Disabilities came up with 402 Recommendations: -

Strategy For Equality 95 • People with Disabilities came up with 402 Recommendations: - All Sectors • Key: Disability Defined within a Social Model • Legislation introduced would be “rights based” • Independent Assessment of Need

Equality Legislation • • • The Employment Equality Act 1998 National Disability Authority Act

Equality Legislation • • • The Employment Equality Act 1998 National Disability Authority Act 1999 The Equal Status Act 2000 The Equality Act 2004 The Education for Persons with Special Educational Needs Act 2004 • The Citizens Information Act 2004. • The Disability Act 2005 • The Citzens Information Act 2006 -Advocacy

Equality Acts Legislation • Illegal to discriminate against worker or job applicant with disability

Equality Acts Legislation • Illegal to discriminate against worker or job applicant with disability • Discrimination is in context of worker being able to do core job • Employer must reasonably accommodate disability – if cost not disproportionate • Premises serving the public must be accessible – if cost of doing so is nominal

Equality -Infastructure • • Equality Authority 99 Equality Tribunal 99 National Disability Authority 2000

Equality -Infastructure • • Equality Authority 99 Equality Tribunal 99 National Disability Authority 2000 National Council for Special Education 05

National Disability Strategy 06 -16 sets the Agenda for Change • Disability Act 05

National Disability Strategy 06 -16 sets the Agenda for Change • Disability Act 05 • Education of Persons with Special Needs Act 06 • 6 Sectoral Plans • Multi-annual funding for high support needs • Citizen Information Bill re advocacy • Equality Acts as foundation • Overseen by interdepartmental Senior Officials Group chaired by D/Taoiseach -Champion • Cabinet Committee on Social Inclusion

Six Sectoral Plans Government Departments • Dept of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Comreg

Six Sectoral Plans Government Departments • Dept of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Comreg (Communications Regulator), – BCI (Broadcasting Commission of Ireland) • Dept of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, – BRAB – Building Regulations Advisory Board • Dept of Transport. – (National Transport Authority) • Dept of Enterprise, Trade and Employment, • Dept of Health and Children, • Dept of Social and Family Affairs,

Accessible public services Part 3 Disability Act Public bodies must • Ensure people with

Accessible public services Part 3 Disability Act Public bodies must • Ensure people with disabilities can use mainstream public services • Provide information in ways that suit the needs of people with disabilities (e. g. large print, Easy to Read) • Buy in accessible goods and services • By 2015, have accessible premises • All “where practicable and appropriate” • NDA Code of Practice on services, information, procurement Gov/Public Bodies Only – Regulatory Instrument

Accessibility • UN Convention – Art. 9 • Nat. Disability Strategy • Accessible premises,

Accessibility • UN Convention – Art. 9 • Nat. Disability Strategy • Accessible premises, information • Public service obligations for accessible services, premises, information, public procurement • Access to private sector public venues • Co. of Europe • Barrier-free built environment • Universal Design • Accessibility programme by local authorities under Environment Sectoral Plan

Universal Design • UN Convention Art. 4 • Disability Act 2005 • Centre of

Universal Design • UN Convention Art. 4 • Disability Act 2005 • Centre of Excellence • to promote universal design in the development in Universal Design of standards and guidelines • Co of Europe 6 • Guidelines, standards, training of professions – Develop and promote standards – Education of design professions – Work with professional bodies

Correlation between national level accessibility-related policies and achieved accessibility (EU 25, USA, CA, AU)

Correlation between national level accessibility-related policies and achieved accessibility (EU 25, USA, CA, AU)

Centre for Excellence in Universal Design CEUD IT Guidelines • 5 technology areas –

Centre for Excellence in Universal Design CEUD IT Guidelines • 5 technology areas – Web – Public access terminals – Application Software – Telecoms – Smart Card Systems

IT Procurement Toolkit Practical advice on procurement: • Writing an Request for Tender document

IT Procurement Toolkit Practical advice on procurement: • Writing an Request for Tender document (RFT) • Assessing candidates and tenders • Evaluating deliverables eg – sample text to insert into RFT

Digital Accessibility Toolkit for Policy Makers (G 3 ICT)

Digital Accessibility Toolkit for Policy Makers (G 3 ICT)

Standards Past: Standards = minimum requirements Today: Standards = support & catalyst for Innovation

Standards Past: Standards = minimum requirements Today: Standards = support & catalyst for Innovation

Innovation and standards development • European Commission paper – “Towards an increased contribution from

Innovation and standards development • European Commission paper – “Towards an increased contribution from standardisation to innovation in Europe” • Stronger role for standardisation in support of innovation Enables Europe to address economic, environment & social challenges. • Can be a tool to disseminate new knowledge innovation and technology EU Mandates 376 and 420 – Phases 1 completed by CEN – testing & Comformance ETSI – Human Factors

Defining Innovation “Something new that will be adopted by customers” Michael Schrage (MIT)

Defining Innovation “Something new that will be adopted by customers” Michael Schrage (MIT)

Main Reason for non-adoption Failure to fully understand customer needs

Main Reason for non-adoption Failure to fully understand customer needs

Universal Design curriculum for Continious Professional Development (CPD) • European Committee for Standardization (CEN)

Universal Design curriculum for Continious Professional Development (CPD) • European Committee for Standardization (CEN) provides a platform for the development of European Standards and other technical specifications. A CEN Workshop Agreement is a consensus-based specification, drawn up in an open Workshop environment. • goal to specify and recommend a curriculum for training IT and web professionals in how to apply a Universal Design approach. • Launch 27 May, 2009 Brussels

Solution? ? ? e. Accessibility is more than a technical Solution!!! Image courtesy: Raph

Solution? ? ? e. Accessibility is more than a technical Solution!!! Image courtesy: Raph de Rooij - web interface quality specialist, www. webguidelines. nl

Going Forward • Increase Collaboration Transatlantic – Regulation/Directives/Standards – ITU, UN globally • New

Going Forward • Increase Collaboration Transatlantic – Regulation/Directives/Standards – ITU, UN globally • New Champions • Education – integrated into Courses at all Levels • Universal Design – Not as a Marketing tool but as a Process that Includes all and is Good Design – brings more people to the party – older people, gender, eithnic minorities etc

10 th International Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in

10 th International Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe (AAATE) Inclusion between past and future ‐ AT from adapted equipment to inclusive environments August 31 – September 2, 2009, Florence, Italy : The contribution of Assistive Technology and Design for All towards inclusion; • The need for standardization (formal, informal and de facto); • Cultural aspects: e. g. acceptance of different approaches, designs and aesthetics of AT devices and inclusive living environments • Social aspects: penetration of AT and integrated approaches, the role of Europe in building up inclusion competence in emerging and developing countries, etc. ;

 “The difference principle” Institutions to be structured with a built-in bias in favour

“The difference principle” Institutions to be structured with a built-in bias in favour of the disadvantaged (Rawls, 1971)

As international communication and travel increase, it will become increasingly difficult to justify national

As international communication and travel increase, it will become increasingly difficult to justify national or regional differences in accessibility criteria. . . the marketplace is demanding accessibility at a rate that is outstripping accessibility standards. John P. S. Salmen, Universal Designers and Consultants