DOLE RO 7 Planning Tool Performance Scorecard as
- Slides: 64
DOLE RO 7 Planning Tool Performance Scorecard (as of March 2017) G u i d i n g R a t e 2 7 %
Accomplishment PAPs/ Indicators 2017 Target Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocatio n Budget Utilization Utilized Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Special Program for Employment of Students (SPES) No. of youth beneficiaries RO 7 Target 9, 400 5, 500 58. 51% W/ NIR 11, 604 5, 500 47. 39% RO 7 Target 269 150 55. 76% W/NIR 342 150 43. 86% RO 7 2, 314 1, 461 63. 14% W/ NIR 2, 862 1, 461 51. 05% SPES Graduate Techvoc/ College SPES Babies % Signal
Accomplishment PAPs/ Indicators 2017 Target Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Government Internship Program (GIP) No. of youth beneficiaries RO 7 341 0 0% W/ NIR 433 0 0% 188, 000 70, 761 37. 64% 235, 000 70, 761 30. 11% Labor Market Information (LMI) No. of individuals reached RO 7 W/ NIR % Signal
2017 Target PAPs/ Indicators Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Labor Market Information (LMI) No. of institutions reached RO 7 1, 800 413 22. 94% W/ NIR 2, 200 413 18. 77% Public Employment Services No. of qualified jobseekers referred for placement RO 7 120, 000 37, 422 31. 19% W/ NIR 150, 00 37, 422 24. 95% % Signal
Accomplishment 2017 Target PAPs/ Indicators Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Talent Mapping RO 7 2, 727 0 0% Individual Covered W/ NIR Talent Mapping LGU’s Covered RO 7 W/ NIR 4 0 0 0% 0% % Signal
Accomplishment 2017 Target PAPs/ Indicators Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Public Employment Services Qualified jobseekers placed 80% RO 7 96, 000 31, 181 32. 48% W/ NIR 120, 000 31, 181 25. 98% RO 7 600 0 0% W/ NIR 900 0 Job Start No. of youth beneficiaries 0% % Signal
Accomplishment 2017 Target PAPs/ Indicators Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Public Employment Services LGU PESO provided RO with technical 7 assistance on their institutionalized by W/ end of December NIR 2017 4 0 0% Job Start Internship pledges from partner employers RO 7 W/ NIR 420 0 0% % Signal
2016 Target PAPs/ Indicators Actual % Signal 2016 Budget Allocation Utilized % Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Skills Registry System( SRS) RO 7 LGUs covered Establishments covered 2 W/ NIR RO 7 2, 791 W/ NIR 24 1, 200% 24 % 51 1. 83% 51 % 24 75. 00% 24 61. 54% Skills Registry System( SRS) No. of dailogue/ training with LGUs with SRS RO 7 W/ NIR 32 39 Signal
PAPs/ Indicators Accomplishment 2017 Target Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized % Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Career Guidance Advocacy Program Capacity –Building Activities conducted ( MEMBERS COVERED) Career Guidance and Employment Coaching (CGEC)Slide 16 ( Schools) 236 0 0% (342) 0 0% 64 85 132. 81% (85) 85 100% Signal
Accomplishment 2017 Target Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized % Outcome 1: Enhanced Employability of Workers and Competitiveness of Enterprises Capacity Building for PESO Personnel PESO personnel participated in the capacity - building training on LMI Analysis, BEST, PESO Law IRR and SPES Law IRR FOs, PESO personnel, schools, training institutions and establishments participated in capability –building on PEIS, Philjobnet, talent 65 75 11. 538% 75 90 0 0% Signal
2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Budget Utilization Signal Outcome 2: Sustained Cooperation Between Labor and Employers LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT DIVISION New Labor Laws Compliance System (LLCS) No. of establis hments RO 7 covered RO 7 1, 070 3, 718 BWC 1, 104 with NOFO No. of Establishments PENDING REVIEW No. of Establishments already Reviewed No. of Establishments Already Submitted to ORD @ Approved 28. 78 % Data to be generated 1, 070 0% Data to be generated 0% 2017 Budget Allocation Utilized % Signal
PAPs/Indicators 2017 Target Initial Compliance Rate Actual % Compliance Rates After Correction Signal Outcome 2: Sustained Cooperation Between Labor and Employers Labor Laws Compliance System – Management Information System (MIS) Provided Appropriate Assistance Leading to Compliance 100% 18% GLS Compliance Rate 73% 36. 2% OSHS Compliance Rate 73% 65. 5% Data generated from BWC as of March 31, 2017 Actual % Signal
PAPs/ Indicators Accomplishment 2017 Target Actual % Budget Utilization Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Utilized % Signal Outcome 3: Strengthened Social Protection for Vulnerable Workers DOLE Integrated Livelihood and Emergency Employment Program (DILEEP) No. of beneficiaries assisted § Regular Projects (DILP) RO 7 8, 337 850 10. 20% W/ NIR § No. of Livelihood RO 7 Projects Monitored/ W/ sustained NIR ( SF) 9, 040 15 5 850 % % 0 0% NEXT
PAPs/ Indicators Accomplishment 2017 Target Budget Utilization 2017 Budget Allocation Actual % Signal Utilized % Signal Outcome 3: Strengthened Social Protection for Vulnerable Workers DOLE Integrated Livelihood and Emergency Employment Program (DILEEP) No. of beneficiaries assisted § No. of workers in the RO 7 informal Economy (WEI) Facilitated to various W/ governme NIR nt social security schemes 8, 337 0 % 9, 040 0 % % NEXT
PAPs/ Indicators Accomplishment 2016 Target Actual % Budget Utilization Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Utilized % Signal Outcome 3: Strengthened Social Protection for Vulnerable Workers DOLE Integrated Livelihood and Emergency Employment Program (DILEEP) No. of beneficiaries assisted RO 7 § TUPAD Regular W/ NIR RO 7 § TUPAD ( SF) 1, 155 0 0% 1, 470 2, 763 0 0 0% 0% W/ NIR % % % NEXT
PAPs/ Indicators 2017 Target Included NOFO Accomplishment Actual % Signal Outcome 3: Strengthened Social Protection for Vulnerable Workers Reintegration Services for OFWs (NRCO) No. of beneficiaries of FAS & SBMT No. of beneficiaries of livelihood assistance/ balik-Pinay/ LDAP Byaheng Agriculture Conduct learning Journey Regional Reintegration Information Bulletin 126 40 31. 75% 120 14 11. 67% 30 0 0% 4 0 0% NEXT
PAPs/ Indicators 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal Outcome 2: Sustained Cooperation Between Labor and Employers Conciliation Assistance (SEn. A) Settlement Rate 77% 597/1, 011 59. 05% Disposition Rate 1 100% within prescribed period 838/1, 011 82. 88% 635/893 71. 11% 72 23 31. 94% enhanced Compulsory Arbitration Cases (Spe. ED) Disposition Rate 100% (within prescribed period) Tripartism No. of council meeting/dialogue conducted 4 No. of existing VCGPs 2 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized %
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE Accomplishment FO 2017 Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 2: Sustained Cooperation Between Labor and Employers Tripartism ( No. of Council Meeting/ Dialogue conducted) BFO 4 3 CPFO 4 0 TSSD-LRS 40 7 17. 50% TCFO 12 13 108. 33% Total 60 23 38. 33% 75. 00% 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE Accomplishment FO 2017 Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Special Program for Employment of Students (SPES) BFO 2, 552 0 CPFO 2, 320 0 351 0 TCFO 4, 177 5, 500 131. 67% Total 9, 400 5, 500 58. 51% SFO 0% 0% 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE Accomplishment FO 2017 Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: (SPES) Graduated Techvoc/ College BFO 63 0 CPFO 65 0 SFO 15 0 TCFO 126 150 119. 05% Total 269 150 55. 76% 0% 0% 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE Accomplishment FO 2017 Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: SPES Babies BFO 641 0 0% CPFO 598 0 0% SFO 101 0 0% TCFO 974 1, 461 1, 446. 53 % Total 2, 314 1, 461 63. 14% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Utilization Budget Allocation Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Government Internship Program (GIP) BFO 95 0 0% 125 0 0% 21 0 TCFO 100 0 Total 341 0 CPFO SFO 0% 0% 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Labor Market Information (No. of individuals reached) BFO 47, 000 12, 036 25. 61% CPFO 58, 750 22, 423 38. 17% 4, 700 2, 005 42. 66% TCFO 77, 550 34, 297 44. 23% Total 188, 000 70, 761 37. 64% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO Accomplishment 2017 Target Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Labor Market Information (No. of institutions reached) BFO 160 33 20. 63% CPFO 600 140 23. 33% 40 13 32. 50% TCFO 1, 000 227 22. 7% Total 1, 800 413 22. 94% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Public Employment Services (jobseekers referred for placement) BFO 30, 000 6, 753 22. 51% CPFO 37, 500 15, 437 41. 16% 3, 000 1, 919 63. 97% TCFO 49, 500 13, 313 26. 89% Total 120, 000 37, 422 31. 19% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Labor Market Information (No. of individuals reached) BFO 47, 000 12, 036 25. 61% CPFO 58, 750 22, 423 38. 17% 4, 700 2, 005 42. 66% TCFO 77, 550 34, 297 44. 23% Total 188, 000 70, 761 37. 64% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Public Employment Services ( Qualified Jobseekers placed) 80% BFO 24, 000 6, 025 25. 10% CPFO 30, 000 14, 532 48. 44% 2, 400 1, 130 47. 08% TCFO 39, 600 9, 494 23. 97% Total 96, 000 31, 181 32. 48% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Labor Market Information (No. of individuals reached) BFO 47, 000 12, 036 25. 61% CPFO 58, 750 22, 423 38. 17% 4, 700 2, 005 42. 66% TCFO 77, 550 34, 297 44. 23% Total 188, 000 70, 761 37. 64% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO Accomplishment 2017 Target Actual % 0 0% Signal Budget Utilization 2017 Budget % Signal Allocation Obligation Outcome 1: Jobstart BFO 300 CPFO SFO TCFO Total 300 600 BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Skills Registry System (SRS) No. of dialogue / training with LGUs with SRS BFO 15 15 100% CPFO 15 7 46. 66% SFO 2 2 100% TCFO 0 Total 32 24 75% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Skills Registry System (SRS) LGUs Covered BFO 1 15 1, 500% CPFO 1 7 700% SFO 2 TCFO Total 2 24 1, 200% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Skills Registry System (SRS) Establishments covered BFO 1, 116 12 1. 08% CPFO 1, 675 37 2. 21% SFO 2 TCFO Total 2, 791 51 1. 83% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Capacity –Building Activities conducted BFO 68 0 0% CPFO 75 0 0% SFO 10 0 0% TCFO 83 Total 236 0 0 0% 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 1: Career Guidance and Employment Coaching BFO 19 30 157. 89% CPFO 34 14 41. 18% SFO 2 2 100% TCFO 9 39 433. 33% Total 64 85 132. 81% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE Accomplishment FO 2017 Target Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 2 : Conciliation Assistance through Single Entry Approach or SEn. A Indicator: Settlement Rate BFO 77% CPFO 77% SFO 77% 3/4 TCFO 77% 197/327 TSSDs 77% 202/380 Total 77% 597/1, 011 83/125 112/175 66. 40% 64. 00% 75. 00% 60. 24% 53. 16% 59. 05% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 2 : Conciliation Assistance through Single Entry Approach or SEn. A Indicator: Disposition Rate BFO 100% 103/125 82. 40% CPFO 100% 147/175 84. 00% SFO 100% 4/4 100% TSSDs 100% 301/380 79. 21% TCFO 100% 283/327 86. 54% Total 100% 838/1, 011 82. 89% All pending RFAs are current. BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Actual % Obligation % 507 115 22. 68% % 1, 014 262 25. 84% % 676 239 35. 36% % TCFO 1, 521 454 29. 85% % Total 3, 718 1, 070 28. 78% Signal Outcome 3 : LLCS BFO CPFO TSSD/O RD BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 3 : DOLE Integrated Livelihood and Emergency Employment Program BFO 1, 916 157 8. 19% % CPFO 3, 844 169 4. 40% % 661 0 0% % TCFO 1, 916 524 27. 35% % Total 8, 337 850 10. 20% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 3 : No. of Livelihood Projects monitored/ sustained BFO 4 0 0% % CPFO 7 0 0% % SFO 1 0 0% % TCFO 3 0 0% % Total 15 0 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 3 : No. of workers in the informal Economy ( WIE) facilitated to various government social security schemes BFO 4 0 0% % CPFO 7 0 0% % SFO 1 0 0% % TCFO 3 0 0% % Total 15 0 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 3 : TUPAD ( Regular) BFO 315 0 0% CPFO 420 0 0% % SFO 105 0 0% % TCFO 315 0 0% % Total 1, 155 0 0% % BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Outcome 3 : TUPAD ( Special Fund) BFO 594 0 0% 1, 400 0 0% SFO 175 0 0% TCFO 594 0 0% Total 2, 763 0 0% CPFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Talent Mapping( Individual Covered BFO 682 0 0% CPFO 818 0 0% SFO 136 TCFO 1, 091 0 0% Total 2, 727 0 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Talent Mapping( LGU’s covered) BFO 1 0 0% CPFO 1 0 0% SFO 1 TCFO 1 0 0% Total 4 0 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal PES( LGU PESO provided with technical assistance on their institutionalized BFO 1 0 0% CPFO 1 0 0% SFO 1 TCFO 1 0 0% Total 4 0 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Jobstart ( Internship pledges from partner employers) BFO 210 0 0% CPFO 0 0 0% SFO 0 TCFO 210 0 0% Total 420 0 0% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Capacity Building for PESO Personnel( participated in the capacity building training) LMI Analysis, BEST PESO Law IRR, SPES IRR BFO 30 34 113. 33% CPFO 25 18 72% SFO 3 10 333. 34% TCFO 7 4 57. 14% Total 65 75 115. 38% BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Capacity Building for PESO Personnel( participated in the capacity building training) BFO 35 0 0% CPFO 35 0 0% SFO 5 0 0% TCFO 15 0 0% Total 90 0 0% BACK
DOLE RO 7 Planning Tool Performance Scorecard (as of March 2017) G u i d i n g R a t e 2 7 %
2016 Target Accomplishment Actual % OPCR / SPRS Commitments Family Welfare Program (FWP) Establishments Serviced RO 7 128 69 53. 91% W/ NIR (152) 69 45. 39% R 07 25, 600 22, 779 88. 98% (30, 400) 22, 779 74. 93% Workers Serviced W/ NIR Signal 2016 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized % Signal
Accomplishment 2017 Target PAPs/ Indicators Actual % Signal OPCR / SPRS Commitments Workers Organization and Development Program (WODP) Training Grants Provided RO 7 5 0 0% W/ NIR (6) 0 0% RO 7 75 0 0% W/N IR (100) 0 0% Members Trained 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized % Signal
Accomplishment 2017 Budget Allocation 2017 Target PAPs/ Indicators Actual % OPCR / SPRS Commitments Labor and Employment Education Program R 0 7 109 25 22. 94% 25 18. 25% LHP Seminars Conducted CLES Conducted Budget Utilization W / NIR (137) RO 7 169 41 24. 26% W/ NIR (211) 41 19. 43% Signal Utilized % Signal
Accomplishment 2017 Budget Allocation 2017 Target PAPs/ Indicators Actual % OPCR / SPRS Commitments Labor and Employment Education Program R 0 7 6, 000 Workers and employers W covered by LHP and CLES / NIR RO 7 W/ NIR Budget Utilization 2, 306 38. 43% Signal Utilized % Signal
2017 Target PAPs/ Indicators Accomplishment Actual % Signal OPCR / SPRS Commitments Labor and Employment Education Program RO 7 6, 823 11, 762 172. 39% 54 15 27. 77% 74 15 W/of LEGS Orientation to 7% NIR graduating students Technical Safety Inspection (TSI) RO 7 Establishments Inspected W /NIR 20. 27% 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Utilized % Signal
FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Family Welfare Program (FWP) Establishments Serviced BFO 9 0 0% CPFO 22 10 45. 45% 97 59 60. 82% 128 69 53. 91% SFO TCFO TSSDEWW Total BACK
FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal Family Welfare Program (FWP) Workers Serviced BFO 1, 800 0 0% CPFO 4, 400 561 12. 75% 19, 400 22, 218 114. 53% 25, 600 22, 779 88. 98% SFO TCFO TSSDEWW Total BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal WODP Training Grants Provided BFO 1 0 0% CPFO 1 0 0% 3 0 0% 5 0 0% SFO TCFO Total BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal WODP Members Trained BFO 25 0 0% CPFO 25 0 0% TCFO 75 0 0% Total 125 0 0% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal LHP Seminars Conducted BFO 20 9 45% CPFO 35 3 8. 57% SFO 4 4 100% 50 9 18. 00% 109 25 22. 94% TCFO Total BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal CLES Conducted BFO 32 9 28. 12% CPFO 52 10 19. 23% SFO 7 2 28. 57% 78 20 25. 64% 169 41 24. 26% TCFO Total BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal LEES( Workers and Employers covered by LHP and CLES BFO 1, 200 233 19. 42% CPFO 1, 500 1, 042 69. 47% 300 250 83. 33% TCFO 3, 000 781 26. 03% Total 6, 000 2, 306 38. 43% SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal Seminar/ School Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal LEGS BFO CPFO 1, 549 1, 576 101. 74% 11 seminars 9 schools 13 seminars 13 school 2, 729 585 21. 44% 111 161 145. 05% 2 Seminar 2 school TCFO 2, 434 9, 440 387. 84% 27 seminars 27 schools Total 6, 823 11, 762 172. 39% 53 seminars 51 schools SFO BACK
PERFORMANCE BY FIELD OFFICE FO 2017 Target Accomplishment Actual % Signal 2017 Budget Allocation Budget Utilization Obligation % Signal TSI Establishments Inspected BFO 10 0 0% CPFO 32 15 46. 875% 12 0 0% 54 15 27. 78% SFO TCFO Total BACK
“Relational skills are the most important abilities in leadership. ” John C. Maxwell
- Hr scorecard example
- Jak napsat uvozovky dole ve wordu
- Hoard warriors meaning
- Biscuiterie bouvard dole
- Us dole
- What is oshs
- Gls dole
- Sprs dole
- The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance
- Buildin a strategic planning scorecard is based on mcq
- Potter's wheel data cleaning tool
- Stormrunner load
- Biodiversity performance tool
- Star error prevention tool
- Biodiversity performance tool
- Chapter 11 performance appraisal - (pdf)
- Performance management vs performance appraisal
- All performance attributes designated as joint performance
- Kahoot login code
- Milestoneplan
- Ndis pre planning tool
- Proper practice prevents poor performance
- Capacity planning predictive analytics
- Performance based planning
- Key performance indicators deped
- Proper preparation prevents poor performance gd
- Performance management and strategic planning
- High performance planning
- Strategic planning vs tactical planning
- Planning balance sheet in urban planning
- Scenario planning workforce planning
- Inactivism planning
- Perencanaan kapasitas dan agregat
- Short medium and long term planning in education
- What is language planning
- List the strategic objectives of aggregate planning
- Aggregate planning is capacity planning for
- Balanced scorecard visio
- The control process begins when:
- Balanced scorecard meaning
- Lgu scorecard indicators
- Balanced scorecard adidas
- Voev-inc
- Quality monitoring scorecard
- Firm risk scorecard examples
- Quality monitoring scorecard
- Kpi pt indofood
- Balanced scorecard for airlines
- Compensation scorecard examples
- Redazione balanced scorecard prato
- Kpis for indirect procurement
- Balanced scorecard template doc
- Interview scorecard examples
- Integrated talent management scorecards
- Diversity and inclusion scorecard
- Scorecard
- Appa cybersecurity scorecard
- Tableau de bord rh indicateurs
- Balanced scorecard template powerpoint
- Marketing scorecard template
- Procurement scorecard template
- Metode balance scorecard
- Accounting equation ppt
- Kaplan and norton strategy map template
- Balanced scorecard of starbucks