doc IEEE 802 11 100321 r 3 802

doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0321 r 3 802. 11 WG Editor’s Meeting (Mar ‘ 10) Authors: Submission Date: 2010 -03 -16 Slide 1 Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0321 r 3 Volunteer Editor Contacts • • TGp – Wayne Fisher – wfisher@arinc. com TGs – Kazuyuki Sakoda - Kazuyuki. A. Sakoda@jp. sony. com TGu – Necati Canpolat – necati. canpolat@intel. com TGv – Emily Qi – emily. h. qi@intel. com TGz – Menzo Wentink– mwentink@qualcomm. com TGmb – Adrian Stephens – adrian. p. stephens@intel. com (TBC) TGaa – Hang Liu – hang. liu@thomson. net Editor Emeritus: – TGk – Joe Kwak– joekwak@sbcglobal. net – TGn – Adrian Stephens – adrian. p. stephens@intel. com – TGr – Bill Marshall – wtm@research. att. com – TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget – ncamwing@cisco. com – TGy – Peter Ecclesine – pecclesi@cisco. com Submission Slide 2 Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0321 r 3 Two Technical Editors • Peter Ecclesine runs the face to face meetings • Adrian Stephens runs the publication process • Matthew Gast is the ANA administrator Submission Slide 3 Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0321 r 3 • • Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers! Editor Amendment Ordering Data as of Mar 2010 See http: //grouper. ieee. org/groups/802/11/Reports/802. 11_Timelines. htm Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Date 802. 11 Amendment 6 TGp June 2010 802. 11 Amendment 7 TGz Sept 2010 802. 11 Amendment 8 TGv Sept 2010 802. 11 Amendment 9 TGu Sept 2010 802. 11 Amendment 10 TGs Jan 2011 802. 11 Revision 802. 11 mb June 2011 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 1 TGaa Oct 2011 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 2 TGac Dec 2012 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 3 TGad Dec 2012 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 4 TGae Jun 2012 802. 11 -2011 Amendment 5 TGaf Dec 2012 Submission Slide 4 Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0321 r 3 Mar 2010 Draft Development Snapshot Changes from last report shown in red. T G Published or Draft Baseline Documents 802. 11 k r y w n z. 0 p v u s z 2007 2008 10. 0 11. 0 p 2007 2008 2009 v 2007 2008 2009 6. 0 9. 0 7. 03 u 2007 2008 2009 7. 0 9. 0 8. 03 s 2007 2008 2009 6. 0 9. 0 7. 0 8. 0 4. 01 m b 2007 Inc 2008 2009 Inc Inc 2009 Inc - - - aa 2007 2008 10. 0 4. 0 6. 0 7. 0 3. 0 Submission 2008 9. 0 mb aa 11. 0 2. 01 Slide 5 - 0. 02 Most current doc shaded green. Source MEC Style Guide Word Yes 2007 Menzo Wentink 17 -July Frame 7. 2 Yes 2009 Wayne Fisher 16 -Mar Frame 7. 2 No 2007 Emily Qi 18 -Nov Frame 7. 2 Yes 2007 Necati Canpolat 16 -Mar Frame 8. 0 No 2007 Kazuyuki Sakoda 16 -Mar Frame 7. 2 No 2009 Adrian Stephens 18 -Jan Hang Liu 18 -Nov No Editor Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems) Snapshot Date

doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0321 r 3 802. 11 Style Guide • See 11 -09 -1034 -00 -0000 -wg 11 -style-guide. doc • These style practices are to be followed when submitting drafts for Working Group consideration Submission Slide 6 Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

Mar 2010 doc. : IEEE 802. 11 -10/0321 r 3 Pre-Rev. Com IEEE-SA Review • Possibly near the end of Sponsor Ballot (3 rd recirc or 4 th recirc) , we would offer the draft to the publications editor for review. This allows ambiguities and errors to be addressed in Sponsor Ballot by comments, rather than discover the ambiguities and errors after Rev. Com. • A downside is the possibility that many pages are touched by the changes (like renaming), and voters reopen text that has been stable for new comments. • It appears that during MEC is the least risky time for a publication editor’s review. • Another choice is after initial Sponsor Ballot. We will ask if it is valid to make editorial changes between EC approval and initial sponsor ballot. Submission Slide 7 Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)