Division of Cebu Province DMEA REPORT 2016 Division

Division of Cebu Province DMEA REPORT 2016

Division Profile 1 • No. of Elementary Schools 894 2 • No. of Secondary Schools 239 3 • TOTAL 4 • No. of Districts 1, 133 55

Division Profile 1 • No. of Districts 55 15, 306 2 • No. of Teachers 3 • No. of Municipalities 44 4 • Congressional Districts 7

DMEA SCOPE Total No. of LARDO per Grade Level Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadran (ELEMENTARY) Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadran (SECONDARY) Number of Learners with Mastery Level in each Quadra (KINDERGARTEN) Number of Learners with Mastery Level in each Quadra (GRADE 1 -3 (READING, FILIPINO, MTB) CONCERNS/ISSUES/GAPS/PROBLEMS (CIGPs)

Total Number of LARDOs per Grade Level. No. of PARDOs/ Percentage of Grade Level BOSY 2016 -2017 Enrolment SARDOs PARDOs/ SARDOs Kinder 32581 101 0. 31 1 48205 343 0. 71 2 49047 229 0. 47 3 50383 260 0. 52 4 50887 280 0. 55 5 60809 298 0. 49 6 48976 180 0. 37 7 41064 107 0. 26 8 37734 60 0. 16 9 33064 76 0. 23 10 29372 49 0. 17 11 20667 0 0. 00 12

Percentage of LARDO per Grade Level Percentage of LARDOs per Grade Level 0. 80 0. 71 0. 70 0. 60 0. 47 0. 50 0. 40 0. 31 0. 30 0. 20 0. 52 0. 55 0. 49 0. 37 0. 26 0. 23 0. 16 0. 17 0. 10 0. 00 G Ki nd R er AD G E 1 R AD G E 2 R AD G E 3 R AD G E 4 R AD G E 5 R AD G E 6 R AD G E 7 R AD G E 8 R AD G R E 9 AD G E 1 R AD 0 G E 1 R AD 1 E 12 0. 00 Series 1

Percentage of LARDO by Congressional District - ELEMENTARY 1. 32 1. 4 1. 12 1. 2 1 0. 81 0. 75 0. 62 0. 56 0. 57 0. 6 0. 4 0. 2 0. 1 0 FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH FIFTH SIXTH SEVENTH OVERALL DISTRICT DISTRICT

Percentage of LARDO by Congressional District - SECONDARY 2. 22 2. 5 2 1. 95 1. 8 2 1. 57 1. 5 1 1. 14 0. 58 0. 5 0 FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH FIFTH SIXTH SEVENTH OVERALL DISTRICT DISTRICT

Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant (ELEMENTARY) with 0 with 1 -5 ELEMENTARY- LARDOs 894 1 2 3 4 • With O LARDOs • With 1 -5 LARDOs • With 6 -10 LARDOs • With 11 & above LARDOs 599 143 with 6 -10 LARDOs with 11 and above LARDOs 89 63

Total Number of Schools with LARDO in each Quadrant (SECONDARY) with 0 with 1 -5 SECONDARYLARDOs 239 1 2 3 4 • With O LARDOs • With 1 -5 LARDOs • With 6 -10 LARDOs • With 11 & above LARDOs 177 24 with 6 -10 LARDOs with 11 and above LARDOs 17 21

Total Number of Teacher RESPONDENTS Who conducted a meeting with Parents of LARDO NONE with SOME 2, 140 (36. 59%) 1, 383 (26. 65%) with MANY with ALL 666 (11. 39%) 1, 660 (28. 39%)

Was conducting a meeting with parents effective? % YES 83. 45 NO 16. 55 Peer Guidance Home Visits 13. 76 % 34. 19 % 52. 05 %

Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each Quadrant KINDERGARTEN Enrolme Beginnin Developi Consiste nt g ng nt 32, 581 8, 145 12, 707 11, 729

Percentage of Learners (Mastery Level)KINDERGARTEN 45. 00 39. 00 40. 00 36. 00 35. 00 30. 00 25. 00 20. 00 15. 00 10. 00 5. 00 0. 00 Beginning Developing Consistent

Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each Quadrant GRADE 1 -3 (READING) ENGLISH Grad Enrolme e nt Level Poor Frustrati Instructio Independ on nal ent 1 48, 205 17, 900 14, 821 10, 085 5, 400 2 49, 047 7, 463 14, 852 20, 352 6, 380 3 50, 383 5, 105 16, 741 22, 005 6, 531

Percentage of Learners with Mastery Level READING-ENGLISH 50. 00 45. 00 40. 00 41. 49 43. 68 37. 13 35. 00 30. 74 30. 28 33. 23 30. 00 25. 00 20. 92 20. 00 15. 22 15. 00 11. 20 10. 13 13. 01 12. 96 10. 00 5. 00 0. 00 Poor Frustration GRADE 1 Instructional GRADE 2 Independent GRADE 3

Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each Quadrant GRADE 1 -3 (READING) FILIPINO Grad Enrolm e ent Level Poor Frustratio Instructio Independ n nal ent 1 48, 205 14, 049 13, 951 13, 584 6, 621 2 49, 047 5, 500 13, 125 21, 617 8, 805 3 50, 383 3, 582 14, 179 23, 142 9, 480

Percentage of Learners with Mastery Level READING-FILIPINO 50. 00 44. 07 45. 00 45. 93 40. 00 35. 00 30. 00 29. 14 28. 94 26. 76 28. 14 28. 18 25. 00 17. 95 18. 82 20. 00 15. 00 13. 74 11. 21 10. 00 7. 11 5. 00 0. 00 Poor Frustration GRADE 1 Instructional GRADE 2 Independent GRADE 3

Number of Learners with Mastery Level in Each Quadrant GRADE 1 -3 (READING) MTB Grad Enrolm e ent Level Poor Frustratio Instructio Independ n nal ent 1 48, 205 10, 678 15, 804 14, 197 7, 526 2 49, 047 5063 12, 762 21, 339 9, 883 3 50, 383 3, 313 13, 183 22, 798 11, 088

Percentage of Learners with Mastery Level READING-MTB 50. 00 43. 51 45. 00 45. 25 40. 00 32. 79 35. 00 29. 45 30. 00 25. 00 26. 02 26. 17 22. 15 20. 15 22. 01 20. 00 15. 61 15. 00 10. 32 10. 00 6. 58 5. 00 0. 00 Poor Frustration Instructional Independent GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3

Policies in K to 12 If NO what? Home Visits 3159 None 1 -3 4 -6 More meetings 733 Performance contract others 212 155 Was Intervention conducted 7 -9 10 more YES NO 7441 592

POLICY COMPLIANCE ALWAYS MOST OF THE TIME SOMETIMES NONE Drill/ Mastery 4069 5859 1135 39 Reward/Punishment 1925 3453 4933 465 Lecture 2685 5249 2692 183 Textbook 2097 4658 3763 293 Interactive 4257 5276 1241 9 Groupings 2459 5419 2975 38 Guided Discovery 2781 5313 2820 65 Manipulative 778 1792 6680 1491 Demonstration 4377 5118 1191 20 Constructivism 4159 5163 1465 35 Inquiry 2327 5059 3198 88 Reflective 3009 4913 2514 166 Journals 367 1106 5924 3124 Integration 3004 4692 2808 201

Policies in K to 12 None 1 -3 Failures 4 -6 7 -9 4563 2752 1129 365 Student you’ve 3836 3027 1136 393 meet Parents you’ve 3080 3324 1150 418 meet Was the meeting effective? YES 7515 10 more 918 715 635 NO 619

Policies in K to 12 If NO what? Home Visits 3159 None 1 -3 4 -6 More meetings 733 Performance contract others 212 155 Was Intervention conducted 7 -9 10 more YES NO 7441 592

CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP LEARNERS TEACHERS TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution Mapping/ Data Mining, identification of schools/ teachers/ Learners with CIGP Home visitation ICT Integration Remedial reading Designated DSS Rewards System Capacitate SH/Teachers on : Varied instructional delivery, conduct of remediation structure Trigger person New/ recurring LARDO’s Institutional PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Failures Institutional PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Reading Mastery technical EPS, PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Instructional Competence technical SDS, ASDS, PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Conduct orientation, Induction, Training and LAC sessions Intensify Capacity Building and LAC Session activitieds Time on task technical PSDS, SH, Teachers recurring Intensify Time-on. Task Policy Constant Monitoring 21 st skills Integration technical PSDS, SH, Teachers new Conduct Training Needs Analysis on ICT Skills Conduct Capacity Building Training on identified

CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP Sch. HEADS/ Managers TYPE OF CIGP Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution Constant technical assistance given to School Heads on Instructional supervision, Resource generation and mobilization, SIP preparation, review and revalidation, Regular Division Executive Conference in 3 batches structure Trigger person New/ recurring Time on Task Technical/ institution al SH, PSDS, recurring Observance of the required number of observations to be conducted monthly Report Management Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring M and E Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring Instructional Supervision Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring Managerial competence Technical SH, PSDS, EPS Recurring Capacity building/ Training on Report Management, Monitoring and evaluation, Instructional supervision

CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP IM/Learning Materials TYPE OF CIGP structure Trigger person New/ recurring Adequacy/ availability Institutional SH, PSDS, EPS recurring Maximizing use Institutional SH, PSDS, EPS recurring Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution *In-house production of Grade 5 and Grade 11 Learners’ materials and Teachers’ guides *Intensify production of Learners’ materials and Teachers’ guides for all grade levels *hiring of personnel assigned to manned in the production of the materials *utilization of the LRMDS portal and Division website *Maximize the use of LRMDS portal and Division website for uploading and downloading of learners’ materials *School-to. School Partnership( 318 recipient schools)

CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP Learning Facilities Physical Facilities TYPE OF CIGP structure Trigger person New/ recurring Classroom Needs Institutional SH, PSDS, EPS recurring Blackboard Institutional SH, PSDS, EPS recurring CR adequacy Institutional SH, PSDS, EPS recurring Water Institutional SH, PSDS, EPS recurring Electricity Institutional SH, PSDS, EPS recurring Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution *Coordinate with the Physical Facility Incharge • *Tap possible partners from Private institutions (eg. RAFI, Basa Pilipinas, VECO, Rotary Club, AFLATOUN Project. Lamac Coop. ) *Chinese Chamber of Commerce • • Intensify Public. Private partnerships Allocation of school buildings using SEF Fund (35 M) Allocation of other facilities using LGU SEF Fund Intensify Adopt-a. School Program Giving of Plaque of Appreciation to Donors and partners

CIGPs that Contribute to the School Performance Areas of Concern Implementation CIGP Financial Management Resource mobilization TYPE OF CIGP structure Trigger person Institutional, technical SH, PSDS, Disbursing Officer, Acountant, Bookkeeper, Property Custodian, BAC Resource Generation Liquidation of Funds Late SARO Institutional, technical New/ recurring Action taken/ to be taken Proposed Resolution Training of newly-hired bookkeepers, In-house Training (COA) PHILGEPS, Developed Scheme on liquidation, Assigned bookkeepers to check liquidation reports *Intensify capacity building of bookkeepers, accountant, budget officer

FUNDS ALLOCATION AND UTILIZATION

ALLOTMENT RECEIVED OBLIGATIONS INCURRED UNOBLIGATED ALLOTMENT PS (GAS & OPERATION) 3, 925, 967, 000. 00 2, 911, 122, 790. 09 1, 014, 844, 209. 91 TOTAL PS 4, 972, 687, 367. 86 3, 572, 131, 579. 36 1, 400, 555, 788. 50 TOTAL MOOE 439, 911, 593. 84 316, 591, 626. 26 123, 319, 967. 58 CAPITAL OUTLAY 1, 000. 00 500, 000. 00 GRAND TOTAL 5, 413, 598, 961. 70 3, 889, 223, 205. 62 1, 524, 375, 756. 08

PERCENTAGE UTILIZATION OF FUNDS 71. 84 74. 15 71. 84 71. 97 80. 00 50. 00 70. 00 60. 00 50. 00 40. 00 30. 00 20. 00 10. 00 PS (GAS & OPERATION) TOTAL PS TOTAL MOOE CAPITAL OUTLAY GRAND TOTAL

Thank you !