Distance magic and group distance magic graphs Report
- Slides: 153
Distance magic and group distance magic graphs Report on work in progress (and a few dead ends) Dalibor Froncek University of Minnesota Duluth
Incomplete round robin tournaments
Incomplete round robin tournaments What if we have 8 teams but not enough time to play a complete tournament? Say we can play only 4− 6 games per team.
Incomplete round robin tournaments What if we have 8 teams but not enough time to play a complete tournament? Say we can play only 4− 6 games per team. What games we choose, if the teams are ranked according to their strength? We have several options:
Incomplete round robin tournaments What if we have 8 teams but not enough time to play a complete tournament? Say we can play only 4− 6 games per team. What games we choose, if the teams are ranked according to their strength? We have several options: • All teams have the same strength of schedule
Incomplete round robin tournaments What if we have 8 teams but not enough time to play a complete tournament? Say we can play only 4− 6 games per team. What games we choose, if the teams are ranked according to their strength? We have several options: • All teams have the same strength of schedule • The tournaments mimics the complete tournament (strongest team has easiest schedule)
Incomplete round robin tournaments What if we have 8 teams but not enough time to play a complete tournament? Say we can play only 4− 6 games per team. What games we choose, if the teams are ranked according to their strength? We have several options: • All teams have the same strength of schedule • The tournaments mimics the complete tournament (strongest team has easiest schedule) • All teams have the same chance of winning (weakest team has easiest schedule)
Incomplete round robin tournaments What if we have 8 teams but not enough time to play a complete tournament? Say we can play only 4− 6 games per team. What games we choose, if the teams are ranked according to their strength? We have several options: • All teams have the same strength of schedule • The tournaments mimics the complete tournament (strongest team has easiest schedule) • All teams have the same chance of winning (weakest team has easiest schedule)
Incomplete round robin tournaments What if we have 8 teams but not enough time to play a complete tournament? Say we can play only 4− 6 games per team. What games we choose, if the teams are ranked according to their strength? We have several options: • All teams have the same strength of schedule • The tournaments mimics the complete tournament (strongest team has easiest schedule) • All teams have the same chance of winning (weakest team has easiest schedule)
Distance magic labeling Distance magic vertex labeling of a graph G with n vertices: A bijection μ from the vertex set of G to {1, 2, …, n} such that sum w(x) of labels of the neighbors of each vertex (called the weight of x) is equal to the same constant m.
Distance magic labeling Distance magic vertex labeling of a graph G with n vertices: A bijection μ from the vertex set of G to {1, 2, …, n} such that sum w(x) of labels of the neighbors of each vertex (called the weight of x) is equal to the same constant m.
Distance magic labeling Distance magic vertex labeling of a graph G with n vertices: A bijection μ from the vertex set of G to {1, 2, …, n} such that sum w(x) of labels of the neighbors of each vertex (called the weight of x) is equal to the same constant m.
Distance magic labeling Distance magic vertex labeling of a graph G with n vertices: A bijection μ from the vertex set of G to {1, 2, …, n} such that sum w(x) of labels of the neighbors of each vertex (called the weight of x) is equal to the same constant m.
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Qn Vertex set: All binary n-tuples Edge set: Two vertices adjacent iff they differ in exactly one position
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Qn Vertex set: All binary n-tuples Edge set: Two vertices adjacent iff they differ in exactly one position
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Recursive definition of Qn Take two copies of Qn-1 and join the corresponding vertices by an edge This is the cartesian product Qn-1 K 2
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Recursive definition of Qn Take two copies of Qn-1 and join the corresponding vertices by an edge This is the cartesian product Qn-1 K 2
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Recursive definition of Qn Take two copies of Qn-1 and join the corresponding vertices by an edge This is the cartesian product Qn-1 K 2
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Recursive definition of Qn Take two copies of Qn-1 and join the corresponding vertices by an edge This is the cartesian product Qn-1 K 2
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Recursive definition of Qn Take two copies of Qn-1 and join the corresponding vertices by an edge This is the cartesian product Qn-1 K 2 or Qn-2 C 4
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Recursive definition of Qn Take two copies of Qn-1 and join the corresponding vertices by an edge This is the cartesian product Qn-1 K 2 or Qn-2 C 4
n-dimensional hypercube Qn Recursive definition of Qn Take two copies of Qn-1 and join the corresponding vertices by an edge This is the cartesian product Qn-1 K 2 or Qn-2 C 4
Distance magic labeling of Qn Remark: For k-regular graphs we can use for labels the set {0, 1, 2, …, n– 1} instead of {1, 2, …, n}
Distance magic labeling of Qn Remark: For k-regular graphs we can use for labels the set {0, 1, 2, …, n– 1} instead of {1, 2, …, n}
Distance magic labeling of Qn Remark: For k-regular graphs we can use for labels the set {0, 1, 2, …, n– 1} instead of {1, 2, …, n} and define μ' (x) = μ(x) – 1
Distance magic labeling of Qn Remark: For k-regular graphs we can use for labels the set {0, 1, 2, …, n– 1} instead of {1, 2, …, n} and define μ' (x) = μ(x) – 1 Then we have m'=m–k
Distance magic labeling of Qn
Distance magic labeling of Qn Small cases: n=1 NO
Distance magic labeling of Qn Small cases: n=1 NO n=2 YES
Distance magic labeling of Qn Small cases: n=1 NO n=2 YES n=3 NO
Distance magic labeling of Qn Small cases: Conjecture? n=1 NO n=2 YES n=3 NO
Distance magic labeling of Qn Small cases: Conjecture? n=1 NO n=2 YES n=3 NO Qn is distance magic if and only if n is even. ; -)
Distance magic labeling of Qn Theorem 1: Conjecture? There is no r-regular DM graph for r odd. Qn is distance magic if and only if n is even.
Distance magic labeling of Qn Theorem 1: Conjecture? There is no r-regular DM graph for r odd. Qn is distance magic if and only if n is even.
Distance magic labeling of Qn Theorem 1: Conjecture: (Acharya, Rao, Singh, Parameswaran) There is no r-regular DM graph for r odd. Qn is not distance magic for any n except n = 2.
Distance magic labeling of Qn Theorem 1: Conjecture: (Acharya, Rao, Singh, Parameswaran) There is no r-regular DM graph for r odd. Qn is not distance magic for any n except n = 2. : -O
Distance magic labeling of Qn Theorem 1: Conjecture: (Acharya, Rao, Singh, Parameswaran) There is no r-regular DM graph for r odd. Qn is not distance magic for any n except n = 2. : -O (what? )
Distance magic labeling of Qn Theorem 1: Conjecture: (Acharya, Rao, Singh, Parameswaran) There is no r-regular DM graph for r odd. Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Qn is not distance magic for any n except n = 2.
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0 Si = sum of vertex labels at level i
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0 Si = sum of vertex labels at level i Wi = sum of vertex weights at level i
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0 Si = sum of vertex labels at level i Wi = sum of vertex weights at level i W 3 = 56 m W 5 = 56 m
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0 Si = sum of vertex labels at level i Wi = sum of vertex weights at level i W 3 = 56 m W 5 = 56 m
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0 Si = sum of vertex labels at level i Wi = sum of vertex weights at level i W 3 = 56 m = 4 S 4 + 6 S 2 and 6 S 2 = 56 m – 4 S 4 W 5 = 56 m = 4 S 4 + 6 S 6 and 6 S 6 = 56 m – 4 S 4 Hence, S 2 = S 6.
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0 Si = sum of vertex labels at level i Wi = sum of vertex weights at level i W 3 = 56 m = 4 S 4 + 6 S 2 and 6 S 2 = 56 m – 4 S 4 W 5 = 56 m = 4 S 4 + 6 S 6 and 6 S 6 = 56 m – 4 S 4 Hence, S 2 = S 6. Similarly, W 1 = 8 m = 2 S 2 + 8 S 0 and 8 S 0 = 8 m – 2 S 2 W 7 = 8 m = 2 S 6 + 8 S 8 and 8 S 8 = 8 m – 2 S 6
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0 Si = sum of vertex labels at level i Wi = sum of vertex weights at level i W 3 = 56 m = 4 S 4 + 6 S 2 and 6 S 2 = 56 m – 4 S 4 W 5 = 56 m = 4 S 4 + 6 S 6 and 6 S 6 = 56 m – 4 S 4 Hence, S 2 = S 6. Similarly, W 1 = 8 m = 2 S 2 + 8 S 0 and 8 S 0 = 8 m – 2 S 2 W 7 = 8 m = 2 S 6 + 8 S 8 and 8 S 8 = 8 m – 2 S 6 But S 2 = S 6 and then S 0 = S 8.
Theorem 2: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k. Proof: (By example for n = 8. ) Level i = all vertices at distance i from the vertex labeled 0 Si = sum of vertex labels at level i Wi = sum of vertex weights at level i W 3 = 56 m = 4 S 4 + 6 S 2 and 6 S 2 = 56 m – 4 S 4 W 5 = 56 m = 4 S 4 + 6 S 6 and 6 S 6 = 56 m – 4 S 4 Hence, S 2 = S 6. Similarly, W 1 = 8 m = 2 S 2 + 8 S 0 and 8 S 0 = 8 m – 2 S 2 W 7 = 8 m = 2 S 6 + 8 S 8 and 8 S 8 = 8 m – 2 S 6 But S 2 = S 6 and then S 0 = S 8. Level 0 and level 8 contain just one vertex each (0 and x, resp. ), we have µ(x) = 0, which is a contradiction.
Theorem 2*: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k+2.
Theorem 2*: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k+2, n ≥ 6. Proved independently by (C. Barrientos, E. Krop, C. Raridan) and DF
Theorem 2*: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k+2, n ≥ 6. Proved independently by (C. Barrientos, E. Krop, C. Raridan) and DF (Un)fortunately, the proof was WRONG!
Theorem 2*: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k+2, n ≥ 6. Proved independently by (C. Barrientos, E. Krop, C. Raridan) and DF (Un)fortunately, the proof was WRONG!
Theorem 2*: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k+2, n ≥ 6. Proved independently by (C. Barrientos, E. Krop, C. Raridan) and DF (Un)fortunately, the proof was WRONG!
Theorem 2*: Qn is not distance magic for n = 4 k+2, n ≥ 6. Proved independently by (C. Barrientos, E. Krop, C. Raridan) and DF (Un)fortunately, the proof was WRONG!
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6 6? !
Distance magic labeling of Q 6 6? ! “Isn’t it three too many, Anton Pavlovich? ”
Distance magic labeling of Q 6 Reduce Q 6 to Q 3
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6
Distance magic labeling of Q 6 Vertex labels in 4 horizontal levels 13 12 10 11 16 17 23 22 63 62 56 57 34 35 37 36 2 3 5 4 31 30 24 25 48 49 55 54 45 44 42 43 58 59 61 60 39 38 32 33 8 9 15 14 21 20 18 19 53 52 50 51 40 41 47 46 7 6 0 1 26 27 29 28
Distance magic labeling of Q 6 Vertex labels in 4 horizontal levels Sum of 4 neighbors in the same horizontal level 13 12 10 11 16 17 23 22 134 134 118 118 63 62 56 57 34 35 37 36 134 134 118 118 2 3 5 4 31 30 24 25 118 118 134 134 48 49 55 54 45 44 42 43 118 118 134 134 58 59 61 60 39 38 32 33 134 134 118 118 8 9 15 14 21 20 18 19 134 134 118 118 53 52 50 51 40 41 47 46 118 118 134 134 7 6 0 1 26 27 29 28 118 118 134 134
Distance magic labeling of Q 6 Sum of 2 neighbors in the same column Sum of 4 neighbors in the same horizontal level 55 55 55 55 71 71 71 71 134 134 134 134 118 118 118 118 71 71 71 71 55 55 55 55 118 118 118 118 134 134 134 134
Distance magic labeling of Q 6 Sum of 2 neighbors in the same column Sum of 4 neighbors in the same horizontal level 55 55 55 55 71 71 71 71 134 134 134 134 118 118 118 118 71 71 71 71 55 55 55 55 118 118 118 118 134 134 134 134 m = 55 + 134 = 71 + 118 = 189
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 Problem: Find a distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 for k >1
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 Problem: Find a distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 for k >1 Theorem (P. Gregor): There is a distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 for k >1
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 Proof: Based on some matrix application and a group distance labeling. Theorem (P. Gregor): There is a distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 for k >1
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 Proof: Based on some matrix application and a group distance labeling. What? Theorem (P. Gregor): There is a distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 for k >1
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 Proof: Based on some matrix application and a group distance labeling. What? Group distance magic labeling? Theorem (P. Gregor): There is a distance magic labeling of Q 4 k+2 for k >1
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 revisited We know that distance magic labeling of Q 4 does not exist.
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 revisited We know that distance magic labeling of Q 4 does not exist. Couldn’t we find a less restrictive labeling?
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 revisited Definition: Let G be a graph with n vertices and G a group with n elements. We call a bijection g: V(G) �G G-distance magic labeling if w(x) = m for some m in G. We know that distance magic labeling of Q 4 does not exist. Couldn’t we find a less restrictive labeling?
Distance magic labeling of Q 4 revisited Definition: Let G be a graph with n vertices and G a group with n elements. We call a bijection g: V(G) �G G-distance magic labeling if w(x) = m for some m in G. We know that distance magic labeling of Q 4 does not exist. Couldn’t we find a less restrictive labeling? Maybe Z 16 -distance magic labeling?
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k+1
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k+1 Theorem: There is no r-regular distance magic graph for r odd.
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k+1 Theorem: There is no r-regular distance magic graph for r odd. Theorem: (Sylwia Cichacz) There is no r-regular Zn-distance magic graph for r odd.
G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k+1 Theorem: There is no r-regular distance magic graph for r odd. Theorem: (Sylwia Cichacz) There is no r-regular Zn-distance magic graph for r odd. Theorem: There is no r-regular G -distance magic graph for r odd any Abelian group G.
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Definition: Let G be a graph with n vertices and G a group with n elements. We call a bijection g: V(G) �G G-distance magic labeling if w(x) = m for some m in G. We know that distance magic labeling of Q 4 does not exist. Couldn’t we find a less restrictive labeling? Maybe Z 16 -distance magic labeling?
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling 13 12 10 11 15 14 8 9 2 3 5 4 0 1 7 6
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x)
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x) 6
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x) 6 6
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x) 6 6 6
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x) 6 6 6 6
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 How about another constant? 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x)
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 How about another constant? Define gi(x) = g(x) + i 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x)
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 How about another constant? Define gi(x) = g(x) + i Then wi(x) = w(x) + 4 i 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x)
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 How about another constant? Define gi(x) = g(x) + i Then wi(x) = w(x) + 4 i Say i = 1 0 1 7 6 11 13 12 10 11 13 9 15 14 8 9 15 4 2 3 5 4 2 6 0 1 7 6 0 13 12 10 11 w(x)
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 How about another constant? Define gi(x) = g(x) + i Then wi(x) = w(x) + 4 i Say i = 1 1 2 8 7 12 14 13 11 12 14 10 0 15 9 10 0 5 3 4 6 5 3 7 1 2 8 7 1 14 13 11 12 w(x)
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 How about another constant? Define gi(x) = g(x) + i Then wi(x) = w(x) + 4 i Say i = 1. Then m = 10. 1 2 8 7 12 14 13 11 12 14 10 0 15 9 10 0 5 3 4 6 5 3 7 1 2 8 7 1 14 13 11 12 w(x) 10 10 10 10
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 Using i = 0, 1, 2, 3, we can do it for m = 2, 6, 10, 14 Can we do it for other constants than 2, 6, 10, 14? 1 2 8 7 12 14 13 11 12 14 10 0 15 9 10 0 5 3 4 6 5 3 7 1 2 8 7 1 14 13 11 12 w(x) 10 10 10 10
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 Using i = 0, 1, 2, 3, we can do it for m = 2, 6, 10, 14 Can we do it for other constants than 2, 6, 10, 14? No. 1 2 8 7 12 14 13 11 12 14 10 0 15 9 10 0 5 3 4 6 5 3 7 1 2 8 7 1 14 13 11 12 w(x) 10 10 10 10
Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 Z 16 -distance magic labeling with m = 6 Using i = 0, 1, 2, 3, we can do it for m = 2, 6, 10, 14 Can we do it for other constants than 2, 6, 10, 14? No. For 4 -regular graphs with 0 (mod 4) vertices, m is always 2 (mod 4). 1 2 8 7 12 14 13 11 12 14 10 0 15 9 10 0 5 3 4 6 5 3 7 1 2 8 7 1 14 13 11 12 w(x) 10 10 10 10
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k? Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 with m = 2, 6, 10, 14 Recall that Q 2 allows a Z 4 -distance magic labeling Problem: Does there exist a Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for n = 22 k = 4 k and k > 2? Or in general a G -distance magic labeling of Q 4 k?
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k? Z 16 -distance magic labeling of Q 4 with m = 2, 6, 10, 14 Recall that Q 2 allows a Z 4 -distance magic labeling Problem: Does there exist a Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for n = 22 k = 4 k and k > 2? Or in general a G -distance magic labeling of Q 4 k?
So is there a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k with k ≥ 3 for some group G?
Z 2×…×Z 2 -distance magic labeling of Q 2 k Observation: There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and G = Z 2×…×Z 2.
Z 2×…×Z 2 -distance magic labeling of Q 2 k Observation: There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and G = Z 2×…×Z 2. Proof: Take the “natural” labeling. The neighbors of x = x 1 x 2…x 2 k are xi = x 1 x 2…xi– 1 (xi+1) xi+1…x 2 k for i = 1, 2, …, 2 k.
Z 2×…×Z 2 -distance magic labeling of Q 2 k Observation: There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and G = Z 2×…×Z 2. Proof: Take the “natural” labeling. The neighbors of x = x 1 x 2…x 2 k are xi = x 1 x 2…xi– 1 (xi+1) xi+1…x 2 k for i = 1, 2, …, 2 k. Then x 1+x 2 = = (2 x 1+1) (2 x 2+1)(2 x 3)…(2 x 2 k) = = 1100… 0
Z 2×…×Z 2 -distance magic labeling of Q 2 k Observation: There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and G = Z 2×…×Z 2. Proof: Take the “natural” labeling. The neighbors of x = x 1 x 2…x 2 k are xi = x 1 x 2…xi– 1 (xi+1) xi+1…x 2 k for i = 1, 2, …, 2 k. Then x 1+x 2 = = (2 x 1+1) (2 x 2+1)(2 x 3)…(2 x 2 k) = = 1100… 0 Similarly we have x 2 i– 1+x 2 i = = (2 x 1)…(2 x 2 i– 1+1) (2 x 2 i+1) …(2 x 2 k) = = 00… 0110… 0
Z 2×…×Z 2 -distance magic labeling of Q 2 k Observation: There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and G = Z 2×…×Z 2. Proof: Take the “natural” labeling. The neighbors of x = x 1 x 2…x 2 k are xi = x 1 x 2…xi– 1 (xi+1) xi+1…x 2 k for i = 1, 2, …, 2 k. Then x 1+x 2 = = (2 x 1+1) (2 x 2+1)(2 x 3)…(2 x 2 k) = = 1100… 0 Similarly we have x 2 i– 1+x 2 i = = (2 x 1)…(2 x 2 i– 1+1) (2 x 2 i+1) …(2 x 2 k) = = 00… 0110… 0 and the sum of all neighbors is 111… 1.
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k Theorem: There exists a Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and n = 4 k.
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k Theorem: There exists a Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and n = 4 k. Proof: Recursive construction.
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k Theorem: There exists a Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and n = 4 k. To label Q 2 k+2 : • take four copies of Q 2 k • multiply the labels by 4 or − 4 • in each copy, add to the label of Proof: Recursive construction. the four images of a vertex x elements 0, 1, 2, 3 of Z 4 n, resp.
Zn-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k To label Q 2 k+2 : • take four copies of Q 2 k • multiply the labels by 4 or − 4 • in each copy, add to the label of the four images of a vertex x elements 0, 1, 2, 3 of Z 4 n, resp.
Is there a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k with k ≥ 3 for other groups G?
Is there a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k with k ≥ 3 for other groups G? Theorem (? ? ): There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and any Abelian group G of order n = 4 k.
Is there a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k with k ≥ 3 for other groups G? Theorem (? ? ): There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Q 2 k for k ≥ 1 and any Abelian group G of order n = 4 k. Proof: Recursive construction similar to the previous one.
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Problem: Does there exist a Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck ?
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Problem: Does there exist a Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck ? Theorem: (Rao, Singh, Parameswaran) G =Cm Ck is distance magic if and only if m = k = 4 s + 2
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Problem: Does there exist a Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck ? Theorem: (Rao, Singh, Parameswaran) G =Cm Ck is distance magic if and only if m = k = 4 s + 2 Theorem: There exists a Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck if and only if mk is even.
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Theorem: There exists a Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck if and only if mk is even.
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof:
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof:
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof:
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof:
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof:
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k)
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) x 21 x 12 Σ x 23 x 32
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) x 21 x 12 Σ x 23 x 32 Σ x 34 x 43
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) x 21+ x 12= x 43+ x 34= … x 21 x 12 Σ x 23 x 32 Σ x 34 x 43
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm ×Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) x 21+ x 12= x 43+ x 34= … but when l is odd …=x 32+ x 23= x 54+ x 45=… x 21 x 12 Σ x 23 x 32 Σ x 34 x 43
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm ×Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) x 21+ x 12= x 43+ x 34= … but when l is odd …=x 32+ x 23= x 54+ x 45=… so xij+ xi+1, j-1= Σ/2 x 23 x 32 Σ/2
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) x 21+ x 12= x 43+ x 34= … but when l is odd …=x 32+ x 23= x 54+ x 45=… so but xij+ xi+1, j-1= Σ/2 xi, j+2+ xi+1, j-1= Σ/2 x 23 Σ/2 x 34
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) x 21+ x 12= x 43+ x 34= … but when l is odd …=x 32+ x 23= x 54+ x 45=… so xij+ xi+1, j-1= Σ/2 but xi, j+2+ xi+1, j-1= Σ/2 and xi, j+2 = xi, j x 23 x 32 Σ/2 x 34
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) x 21+ x 12= x 43+ x 34= … but when l is odd …=x 32+ x 23= x 54+ x 45=… so xij+ xi+1, j-1= Σ/2 but xi, j+2+ xi+1, j-1= Σ/2 and xi, j+2 = xi, j Contradiction! x 23 x 32 Σ/2 x 34
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: Diagonal length is l = lcm(m, k) Hence, mk cannot be odd. x 23 x 32 Σ/2 x 34
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: When n=mk even, l is even. 0 h Find a subgroup of Zn of order l/2, say H = <h>. Then h = 2 n/l. Fill half of a diagonal by H 2 h
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: When n=mk even, l is even. Find a subgroup of Zn of order l/2, say H = <h>. Then h = 2 n/l. Fill half of a diagonal by H, and the rest by coset H – 1 going “backwards. ” 0 n– 1 h –h– 1 2 h …
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: When n=mk even, l is even. Find a subgroup of Zn of order l/2, say H = <h>. Then h = 2 n/l. Fill half of a diagonal by H, and the rest by coset H – 1 going “backwards. ” 0 n– 1 h– 1 h n– 1 –h– 1 2 h n– 1 … h– 1
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: When n=mk even, l is even. Find a subgroup of Zn of order l/2, say H = <h>. Now fill other diagonals carefully by cosets H+i and H–i– 1 to obtain the same sums, n– 1 and h– 1. 0 n– 1 h– 1 h n– 1 –h– 1 2 h n– 1 … h– 1
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: When n=mk even, l is even. Find a subgroup of Zn of order l/2, say H = <h>. Now fill other diagonals carefully by cosets H+i and H–i– 1 to obtain the same sums, n– 1 and h– 1. Then Σ = h– 2. 0 n– 1 h– 1 h n– 1 –h– 1 2 h n– 1 … h– 1
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Proof: When n=mk even, l is even. Find a subgroup of Zn of order l/2, say H = <h>. Now fill other diagonals carefully by cosets H+i and H–i– 1 to obtain the same sums, n– 1 and h– 1. Then Σ = h– 2. 0 n– 1 h– 1 h n– 1 –h– 1 2 h n– 1 … h– 1
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □ Ck Remark: For n=mk ≡ 0 (mod 4), we have always Σ ≡ 2 (mod 4). For n=mk ≡ 2 (mod 4), we have Σ ≡ 0 (mod 4). 0 n– 1 h– 1 h n– 1 –h– 1 2 h n– 1 … h– 1
Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm □Ck Remark: For n=mk ≡ 0 (mod 4), we have always Σ ≡ 2 (mod 4). For n=mk ≡ 2 (mod 4), we have Σ ≡ 0 (mod 4). Theorem: There is no r-regular DM graph with n vertices for r n 2 mod 4. 0 n– 1 h– 1 h n– 1 –h– 1 2 h n– 1 … h– 1
G-distance magic labeling of Cm □Ck Theorem: (Rao, Singh, Parameswaran) G =Cm Ck is distance magic if and only if m = k = 4 s + 2 Theorem: There exists a Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck if and only if mk is even. Theorem (Sylwia): There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck if mk is even and G = Zl × A where l ≡ 0 mod lcm(m, k).
G-distance magic labeling of Cm □Ck Theorem: (Rao, Singh, Parameswaran) G =Cm Ck is distance magic if and only if m = k = 4 s + 2 Theorem (Sylwia): Theorem: There exists a Zmk-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck if and only if mk is even. Observation: There exists a G-distance magic labeling of C 12 C 36 by G = Z 6 × Z 2. There exists a G-distance magic labeling of Cm Ck if mk is even and G = Zl × A where l ≡ 0 mod lcm(m, k).
Thank you!
- Graphs that compare distance and time are called
- Testability tips in state graphs
- Graphs that enlighten and graphs that deceive
- Polynomial end behavior chart
- Increasing speed distance time graph
- Distance velocity acceleration graphs
- Interpreting distance time graphs
- Interpreting distance time graphs
- Graphing speed
- Non linear distance time graphs
- Writing a status report
- A delivery truck travels 18 blocks north
- Sperling (1960)
- Anova within group and between group
- Voluntary group and involuntary group examples
- Amino group and carboxyl group
- Amino group and carboxyl group
- Group 2 specialties
- Joining together group theory and group skills
- The ratio of input distance to output distance
- Standish group chaos report 2020
- Euler circuit
- How to understand graphs and charts
- Aggressive role
- Y = a(b)^x
- Thermal stability of group 1 nitrates
- In group out group
- Group yourself or group yourselves
- Sumner's classification of social groups
- Sine and cosine graphs
- Tables graphs and equations
- Solving systems using tables and graphs
- How to tell if a graph is linear quadratic or exponential
- Quadratic graphs roots and turning points
- Interpreting graphs science
- Horizontal asymptote rule
- Quadratic functions and their graphs
- Lesson 1 analyzing a graph
- Domain all real numbers graph
- How to describe the trends of a graph
- Differences between continuous and discontinuous variation
- Removable and non removable discontinuities
- Algebra graphs and functions
- Chapter 2 frequency distributions and graphs answers
- Bar chart is developed by
- 9-1 quadratic graphs and their properties
- Revenue function graph
- Analyzing graphs of functions and relations
- Whats cotangent
- Tables and line graphs
- Shifting and scaling functions
- Proportional vs non-proportional
- Misleading graphs and statistics answers
- Mcas alt training
- Writing linear equations from situations and graphs
- Inverse proportion graph
- Graphing tangent with transformations
- Sketching reciprocal graphs
- Expander graphs and their applications
- Direct and inverse graphs
- Algorithmic graph theory and perfect graphs
- Stretch and compression graphs
- General ledger
- Chapter 1 functions and their graphs
- Bec writing examples
- Analyzing graphs of functions and relations
- 3-1 inequalities and their graphs
- Tangent and cotangent graphs
- Construction and labelling of graphs
- Symmetric about the y-axis
- 2-7 absolute value functions and graphs
- Sketch the graph of the following rational function
- Drawing and interpreting graphs
- 5-1 writing linear equations from situations and graphs
- Diagrams tables and graphs are used by scientists mainly to
- Common functions and their graphs
- Rational function characteristics
- What is constant polynomial
- A sort of sorts analyzing and sorting graphs
- Alap
- Inequalities and their graphs 3-1
- 3-1 inequalities and their graphs answer key
- How to know if its exponential growth or decay
- Experimental errors and uncertainty
- Chapter 2 functions and graphs
- 3-1 solving systems using tables and graphs
- Words equations tables and graphs
- State graph in software testing
- Polynomial functions and their graphs
- Polynomial functions and their graphs
- Representing graphs and graph isomorphism
- Representing graphs and graph isomorphism
- Lesson 9 graph patterns
- Misleading graphics
- Linear quadratic and exponential graphs
- Charts and tables
- Markov factorization
- Exponential functions and their graphs
- Data tables and graphs
- Chapter 2 functions and their graphs answers
- Chapter 2: frequency distributions and graphs answers
- Chapter 1 graphs functions and models answers
- Inequalities and their graphs
- How to find vertical asymptotes of a function
- Constant speed tape chart
- Lesson 3 rational functions and their graphs
- Maps globes and graphs
- Graphs and geometry lászló lovász
- Exponential growth and decay graphs
- Endergonic and exergonic graphs
- Endergonic and exergonic graphs
- Chapter 2 functions and graphs
- Automated generation and analysis of attack graphs
- Shifting reflecting and stretching graphs
- Magic quadrant for project and portfolio management
- Magic bullet chocolate mousse
- Hufflepuff first year timetable
- Magic school bus moon phases
- Sylvester and the magic pebble character traits
- Dr j frost
- Direct proportional formula
- Which of the following graphs are identical?
- Different type of graphs
- Velocity of a car
- Self complementary graph
- Perfect competition side by side graphs
- Domain of trig functions
- 12-8 practice translations of trigonometric graphs
- Graphs of common functions
- Endo vs exo graphs
- Polar symmetry test
- Plotting straight line graphs tes
- Spirometry graphs
- Compound inequality
- Polar plane graph
- Real world example of reciprocal function
- Interpreting circle graphs
- Jenis graph
- Quadratic graphs worksheet
- Proportional and non proportional
- Hyperbolic tangent
- Limacon rules
- Euler's formula for planar graphs
- @l20.ml:x2+(y-3√x2)2=1
- Patient satisfaction graph
- Function family graphs
- Dr frost maths straight line graphs
- Types of collision
- Antoine zimmermann
- Misleading graphs in the news
- Misleading graphs
- Cyclical unemployment diagram
- Lanliga table
- Limiting factors of photosynthesis graphs