DISKRIMINASI PASAR TENAGA KERJA Labor Economics Series Tokoh

DISKRIMINASI PASAR TENAGA KERJA Labor Economics Series

Tokoh Pejuang Wanita Indonesia Raden Adjeng Kartini 21 April 1879 – 17 September 1904 2

Pemikiran Raden Adjeng Kartini Adanya keinginan untuk memperbaiki kondisi kaum wanita yang disebabkan kungan adat, antara lain : Dunia wanita hanya sebatas tembok rumah. Tidak bebas mendapatkan akses pendidikan. Dipingit dan dinikahkan dengan pria yang tidak dikenal. 3

Fakta di Indonesia 4

Penduduk yang Bekerja (Februari 2012) 45, 000 40, 000 35, 000 15, 441, 120 30, 000 6, 876, 405 25, 000 20, 000 11, 003, 698 25, 116, 020 10, 000 Wanita Sumber : http: //pusdatinaker. balitfo. depnakertrans. go. id ny a in La si du k n ia Ja TU TU Pria 5 20, 465 610, 650 sa an ju Pe n Ta ta Us al ah pi na im pe m Ke 3, 108, 946 a n l na sio of e Pr ga 3, 541, 749 184, 125 934, 988 Te na 3, 295, 852 TU 3, 473, 057 0 9, 755, 566 an 2, 518, 306 Pe rt 3, 983, 193 5, 000 22, 938, 665 Pr o 15, 000

Penduduk yang Bekerja (Februari 2012) Jenis Pekerjaan Utama Tenaga Profesional Jumlah Pria Wanita 3. 473. 057 3. 983. 193 7. 456. 250 934. 988 184. 125 1. 119. 113 Tata Usaha 3. 541. 749 2. 518. 306 6. 060. 055 TU Penjualan 9. 755. 566 11. 003. 698 20. 759. 264 TU Jasa 3. 108. 946 Kepemimpinan 3. 295. 852 6. 404. 798 TU Pertanian 25. 116. 020 15. 441. 120 40. 557. 140 Produksi 22. 938. 665 6. 876. 405 29. 815. 070 610. 65 20. 465 631. 115 Lainnya Jumlah 6 JENIS KELAMIN 69. 479. 641 43. 323. 164 112. 805 Sumber : http: //pusdatinaker. balitfo. depnakertrans. go. id

Rata-rata Upah (2006) 7

Rata-rata Upah (2006) LAPANGAN PEKERJAAN SEKTOR 1 Pertanian, Kehutanan, Perburuan, Perikanan (Agriculture, Forestry, Hunting, Fishery) 2 Pertambangan, Penggalian (Mining and Quarrying) 3 WANITA 438. 149 234. 586 1. 541. 24 1 771. 415 Industri Pengolahan (Manufacturing Industries) 826. 257 583. 768 4 Listrik, gas dan air (Electricity, Gaz and Water) 1. 176. 16 0 1. 338. 737 5 Bangunan (Construction) 734. 070 1. 073. 573 6 Perdagangan Besar, Rumah Makan & Hotel (Wholesale Trade, Restaurant & Hotel) 806. 110 621. 248 7 Angkutan, Pergudangan dan Komunikasi (Transportation, Storage & Communication) 934. 761 944. 419 8 Keuangan, Asuransi, Jasa Perusahaan (Financing, Insurance, Business Services) 1. 422. 25 2 1. 461. 926 9 Jasa Kemasyarakatan (Public Services) 1. 126. 55 9 789. 557 827. 101 612. 131 Rata-rata 8 PRIA

Penduduk yang Bekerja Berdasarkan Jam Kerja (Februari 2012) 40, 000 35, 000 8, 874, 959 30, 000 10, 293, 078 25, 000 24, 757, 499 20, 000 17, 927, 986 7, 354, 950 15, 000 4, 827, 312 6, 952, 926 10, 000 8, 668, 913 5, 000 0 794, 465 1, 379, 487 0 1, 658, 218 1, 039, 073 1 -9 2, 567, 256 5, 718, 802 1, 590, 396 10 -14 15 -24 Pria 9 8, 397, 485 Wanita 25 -34 35 -44 45 -59 ≥ 60

Konsep Diskriminasi 10

Konsep Diskriminasi George Borjas : Differences in EARNINGS and EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES among equally skilled workers employed in the same job simply because of the worker’s race, gender, national origin, sexual orientation, or other seemingly irrelevant characteristics. 11

Konsep Diskriminasi Discrimination means treating people differently and less favourably because of characteristics that are not related to their merit or the requirements of the job. These include race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction and social origin. 12

The Discrimination Coefficient 13

The Discrimination Coefficient Lauched for the first time by Gary S. Becker The Economics of Discrimination (1957) 14

The Discrimination Coefficient Basic Concept : Taste Discrimination Assumption White Black Two types of workers : wage w. W workers : wage w. B 15

The Discrimination Coefficient If the employer is prejudiced againts black, employer gets disutility from hiring black workers. Disutility : employer will act as if costs for black worker w. B (1 + d), where d is positive number and is called : The Discrimination Coefficient 16

The Discrimination Coefficient Suppose that w. B = $10, and that d =0, 5 ; the employer will then act as if hiring a black worker costs $ 15 The greater the prejudiced, the greater is the disutility from hiring black workers, and the greater is the discrimination coefficient d. 17

The Discrimination Coefficient If these black employers prefer to hire black workers, they will act as if hiring a black worker is cheaper than it actually is. Nepotism Coefficient w. B (1 – n ) 18

Labor Market Discrimination Analysis 19

1. Employer Discrimination 20

Skill and Labor Market Outcomes (2001) WHITE BLACK HISPANIC Male Femal e e e Highschool Graduate or more (Percent) 84. 3 85. 2 78. 5 78. 9 56. 1 57. 9 Bachelor’s degree or more (Percent) 29. 1 25. 4 16. 4 17. 5 11. 0 11. 2 79. 9 59. 9 72. 1 65. 2 83. 8 59. 3 4. 7 3. 6 8. 0 7. 0 5. 2 6. 6 Annual Earnings (in $1, 000) 49. 8 29. 6 33. 5 26. 0 30. 8 22. 3 Annual Earnings (Full Time) 55. 4 37. 1 38. 5 30. 8 34. 3 28. 0 Labor Force Participation Rate (Percent) Unemployment Rate (Percent) 21

Fact : White Wage > Black Wage 22

1. Employer Discrimination Assumption : White Workers and Black Workers are Perfect Subtitutes in Production. Firms’s output depends on the total number of workers hired, regardless of their race have the same Marginal Product of Labor ( MPE ) 23

Employer Discrimination Production function: q = f ( EW + EB ) q firm’s output EW number of white workers hired EB number of black workers hired 24

Employment in a non Discriminatory Firm 25

Employment in a non Discriminatory Firm Both groups of workers have the same Value of Marginal Product, a non discriminatory firms will hire whichever group is Cheaper Suppose that w. W > w. B , a firms that doesn’t discriminate will hire black workers up to the point where w. B = VMPE 26

The Employment Decision of a Firm That Does Not Discriminate Dollar VMPE Black workers wage is less than w. B = VMPE white wage ? How many worker will be hired. . ? ? Employment 27

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm 28

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm The employer act as if black wage is not w. B , but instead equal to w. B (1 + d). Where d is discrimination coefficient. The employer’s hiring decision based on a comparison w. W and w. B (1 + d) Hire only blacks if w. B (1 + d) < w. W Hire only white if w. B (1 + d) > w. W 29

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm As long as black and white workers are perfect subtitutes, firms have a segregated workforce. Employer’s who have little prejudice and hence have small discrimination coefficient, will hire only BLACKS (called “Black Firm”). Employer’s who are very prejudice and have very large discrimination coefficient, will hire only WHITES (called “White Firm”). 30

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm WHITE FIRM The white firm hires workers up to the point where : w. W = VMPE Assumption : w W > WB The white firm is paying an excessively high price for its workers and hires relatively few workers ( ) 31

The Employment Decision of a Prejudiced Firm Dollar White Firm VMPE Employment 32

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm BLACK FIRM Non discriminatory firms : w. B = VMPE If discrimination coefficient d 0 : Price of Black Labor w. B ( 1 + d 0 ) Amount of Labor hired : w. B ( 1 + d 0 ) = VMPE 33

Employment in a Discriminatory Firm BLACK FIRM The number of black workers hired, therefore, is smaller for firms that have larger discrimination coefficient. 34

The Employment Decision of a Prejudiced Firm Dollar Discrimination Coefficient Black Firm VMPE Employment 35

Discrimination and Profits 36

Discrimination and Profits Firms that discriminate lose on two counts : The prejudiced employer could have hired the same number of black worker at lower wage. Because black and white workers are perfect subtitutes. Discriminatory black firms are hiring too few workers ( or ) they are giving up profits in order to minimize contact with black workers. 37

Profit and Discrimination Coefficient Dollar max Max Profit w Black Firm 0 White Firm dw Discrimination Coefficient 38

Discrimination and Profits The Most Profitable Firm Zero Discrimination 39

2. Employee Discrimination 40

Employee Discrimination Diskriminasi dilakukan oleh “Fellow Worker” Misal : White worker yang bekerja pada Black Firm dengan upah w. W akan merasa mendapat upah w. W (1 - d). Tidak berpengaruh terhadap “Profitability of Firms” karena white worker dan black worker adalah perfect subtitutes sehingga firm membayar jumlah upah yang sama. 41

3. Customer Discrimination 42

Customer Discrimination Dikemukakan oleh Harry J. Holzer dan Keith R. Ihlanfeldt (1998) research di Atlanta, Boston, Detroit dan Los Angeles. Keputusan membeli tidak ditentukan oleh Actual Price ( p ) tapi oleh The Utility-Adjusted Price p (1 + d). Employer dapat mengatur tenaga penjualan sesuai kondisi. 43

Customer Discrimination Relation between customer discrimination and percent of newly hired worked who are Black More than 50 % Of the firm’s customers are Black More than 75 % Of the firm’s customers are White PERBEDAAN Customer & worker bertemu 58, 0 % 9, 0 % 49, 0 % Customer & worker tidak bertemu 46, 6 % 12, 2 % 34, 4 % - - 14, 6 % TYPE FIRM Perbedaan 44

Customer Discrimination and NBA Lawrence Kahn and Peter Sherer 1998) : A study of attenance records indicates that replacing a black player with an eqqually talented white player bring in about 9, 000 additional fans per year. At $50 a head (a very conservative estimate of ticket prices and concession revenues), the racial switch would increase annual team revenues by roughly $450, 000 45

Measuring Discrimination 46

Measuring Discrimination Asumsi : Tenaga kerja terdiri dari • Male, dengan average wage • Female, dengan average wage Diskriminasi : selisih average wage, yaitu : 47

Measuring Discrimination Pengembangan model : Schooling mempengaruhi pendapatan Earning Function : • Male : • Female : menyatakan pendapatan pria meningkat bila mendapatkan tambahan 1 tahun pendidikan. 48

Measuring Discrimination Model Regresi : 49

Measuring The Impact of Discrimination on the Wage Dollars Men’s Earning Function Men’s Earning Women ’s Earning Function Measure Discrimination : Woman’s Earning Women’s. Men’s Schooling 50

Global Gender Gap 2012 51

Global Gender Gap 2012 : Indonesia - Rank 52

Global Gender Gap 2012 : Indonesia - Score 0. 665 0. 6615 0. 66 0. 655 0. 6594 0. 6591 2012 0. 658 0. 6541 0. 655 0. 6473 0. 645 0. 64 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 53

Global Gender Gap Index 2012

Global Gender Gap 2012 55

Global Gender Gap 2012 56

Global Gender Gap 2012 : Indonesia 57

Terima kasih… 58