Discussion of Parks Recreation Funding Parks Recreation Commission

Discussion of Parks & Recreation Funding Parks & Recreation Commission December 5, 2013

Background ► Operations § Maintenance – funded through Admissions Taxes, Sports Field Revenues, General Fund ► Capital § Admissions Taxes (Sports Field turf replacement) § Park Impact Fees § Misc. revenues: REET, construction sales tax

Selected Capital Revenues, 2013 -2018

PRO Plan ► Chapter 6 – Implementation § Strategies for meeting goals § Financing options to meet goals § Capital Improvement Program list § Financially unconstrained

Helpful Commission Feedback ► What kinds of projects should be prioritized when it comes to allocating resources? ► What additional projects need to be included in future capital plans?

Current Projects in 6 -Year CIP ► High Priority: § CBD Bike-Ped Loop § Woodin Creek Park Trailhead improvements § Wilmot Gateway Park Improvement § Woodinville Fields Tot Lot § De. Young Park Improvement

Current Projects in 6 -Year CIP ► Medium Priority: § Eastside Rail Corridor § Miscellaneous Park Improvements § Wilmot Gateway Park Improvement § Woodinville Fields Tot Lot ► Low/No Priority Given § Boat Launch § Parkland Acquisition/Development § Woodin Creek Trail

Current Projects in 6 -Year CIP ► Total Parks Projects: $7, 095, 000 ► Property Acquisition: $3, 100, 000 ► Civic Center Improvements: $6, 550, 000 ► TOTAL: $16, 745, 000 ► PRO Plan: $20, 089, 280

Other Possible Projects ► Civic Center improvements – parking, deck ► Trails – south side of NE 145 th (between Chateau Ste. Michelle, Woodinville Village) ► Property acquisition ► Other projects?

Current Park Standards NRPA STD 2011 PLANNED LOS TOTAL 2011 UNITS NEEDED ADDT’L UNITS NEEDED 2. 64 AC . 26 AC/1, 000 POP 1 AC/1, 000. 25 -. 5 MI. 1 AC/1, 000 POP. 25 -. 5 MI. 11. 77 AC 9. 13 AC COMMUNITY PARKS 14. 36 AC 1. 41 AC/1, 000 POP 5 AC/1, 000 1 – 3 MI. 3 AC/1, 000 POP 2 MI. 35. 32 AC 20. 96 AC TOTAL PARKS 17 AC. 9. 66 AC/1, 000 POP n/a 4 AC. /1, 000 POP 47. 09 AC 30. 09 AC RESOURCES PARKS/OPEN SPACE 75. 86 AC 7. 47 AC/1, 000 POP NONE 5 AC/1, 000 POP AS NEEDED 58. 86 AC 17. 0 ACRE SURPLUS SPECIAL USE PARKS 5. 26 AC . 052 AC/1, 000 POP NONE n/a n/a TRAILS (OFF ROAD) 1. 78 MI. . 18 MI/1, 000 POP . 45 MI. /1, 000 POP 5. 3 MI. 1. 72 MI PARK TYPES NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS EXISTING ACRES 2005 EXISTING LOS

Comparative Park Standards Woodinville 2011 PLANNED LOS Bellevue Bothell Kirkland Mill Creek 2. 64 1 AC/1, 000 POP. 25 -. 5 MI. 205. 17 13. 65 73. 08 42 Community Park Acres/1, 000 14. 36 3 AC/1, 000 POP 2 MI. 1, 468. 37 34. 57 84 15 Open Space Acres/1, 000 75. 86 5 AC. /1, 000 POP 999. 34 120. 18 296. 31 N/A Public Park Acres as % of City Area 3. 07% N/A 12. 66% 3. 20% 7. 39% 10. 06% 79% N/A 86% N/A 80% N/A 2. 76 N/A . 35 . 32 . 43 . 75 PARK TYPES Neighborhood Park Acres/1, 000 % of Population living within 10 min walk of public park Playgrounds per 10, 000 residents

Suggested Discussion ► What projects or types of projects should be prioritized? ► Are park standards adequate? Should we have more/less? Should we employ different standards? How do we know when we’ve met our goals?