Discrete Radioactive Particle Issues Associated with a Fuel

  • Slides: 30
Download presentation
Discrete Radioactive Particle Issues Associated with a Fuel Pool Cleanout Project 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna

Discrete Radioactive Particle Issues Associated with a Fuel Pool Cleanout Project 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 1

Richard L. Doty and Richard C. Kessler 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 2

Richard L. Doty and Richard C. Kessler 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 2

Management of Contamination Control Ø Measurement Ø Management Ø Perception Ø Culture 5/19/2021 PPL

Management of Contamination Control Ø Measurement Ø Management Ø Perception Ø Culture 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 3

What’s a Discrete Radioactive Particle (DRP)? ØA DRP is defined as a fragment that

What’s a Discrete Radioactive Particle (DRP)? ØA DRP is defined as a fragment that is less than 1 mm in any dimension (typically 10 -20 microns in diameter) with a specific activity greater than or equal to 50, 000 cpm. 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 4

OVERVIEW Ø Project began in late June 2000 Ø Control Rod Blade (CRB) processing

OVERVIEW Ø Project began in late June 2000 Ø Control Rod Blade (CRB) processing began in July Ø First particle exposure to a worker (0. 12 Sv, SDE) was documented on September 8 th 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 5

Ø First high activity particle (20 m. Gy/h) was identified on September 11 th

Ø First high activity particle (20 m. Gy/h) was identified on September 11 th Ø During removal of the Advanced Crusher Shearer on October 12 th, a particle was identified with a measured contact dose rate of 8 Sv/h (a Telescan® was used). Ø Co-60 was identified via in-situ gamma spectroscopy 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 6

Ø On November 28 th, a high activity particle was measured at 2. 2

Ø On November 28 th, a high activity particle was measured at 2. 2 Sv/h on a cask. Ø On December 6 th, a high activity Co-60 particle was identified on a worker’s shoe cover. The measured contact dose rate was 10 m. Sv/h. Ø Overall, 36 particles were identified between September 8 th & December 15 th. 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 7

During the project, no individual was exposed to doses in excess of SSES or

During the project, no individual was exposed to doses in excess of SSES or regulatory dose limits. 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 8

Assessments Ø DRP of 8 Sv/h Ø Series of DRP events Ø Project management

Assessments Ø DRP of 8 Sv/h Ø Series of DRP events Ø Project management Ø Independent oversight of project Ø Critique of event evaluations 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 9

8 Sv/h Co-60 DRP on skin can result in: 2, 900 Gy/h shallow dose

8 Sv/h Co-60 DRP on skin can result in: 2, 900 Gy/h shallow dose equivalent 2. 3 Gy/h deep dose equivalent 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 10

Regulatory Issues Ø Significance Determination Process (SDP) identified a White Finding Ø Notice of

Regulatory Issues Ø Significance Determination Process (SDP) identified a White Finding Ø Notice of Violation - 10 CFR 20. 1501 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 11

Ø From the NRC Inspection report: “…(SSES) did not adequately evaluate and characterize the

Ø From the NRC Inspection report: “…(SSES) did not adequately evaluate and characterize the radiation exposure hazards posed by radioactive particles having highly significant activity. ” 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 12

Ø From the NRC Inspection report: “…(SSES) did not establish and implement adequate radiological

Ø From the NRC Inspection report: “…(SSES) did not establish and implement adequate radiological safety controls to prevent shallow dose equivalent (SDE) and deep-dose equivalent (DDE) personnel exposures from exceeding regulatory requirements. ” 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 13

INPO Ø Preliminary Operating Experience Report - Issued December 27, 2000 Ø Assist Visit

INPO Ø Preliminary Operating Experience Report - Issued December 27, 2000 Ø Assist Visit Recommendations - January Ø Significant Event Report (SER) 3 -01 Issued March 30, 2001 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 14

SER 3 -01 Recommendations Ø Documented guidance for establishing “HPCZ” Ø Thorough pre-job briefings

SER 3 -01 Recommendations Ø Documented guidance for establishing “HPCZ” Ø Thorough pre-job briefings Ø Well-developed contamination control methods, considering all applicable industry events Ø Senior management presence and communication of high standards 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 15

WANO SER 2001 -2 Ø Risk assessments considering prior experience Ø Contingency work plans

WANO SER 2001 -2 Ø Risk assessments considering prior experience Ø Contingency work plans for high-risk evolutions Ø Thorough pre-job briefs and shift handovers 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 16

Susquehanna Perspective on Root Causes ØInaccurate risk perception for exposure to DRP ØProcess focus

Susquehanna Perspective on Root Causes ØInaccurate risk perception for exposure to DRP ØProcess focus on actual doses vs. potential doses ØInadequate pre-job plans for DRP controls ØUnresolved cultural issues regarding questioning attitude, communications, use of operating experience 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 17

What Have We Learned Ø Lack of sensitivity to the consequences of highly radioactive

What Have We Learned Ø Lack of sensitivity to the consequences of highly radioactive material (particles) (Root Cause 2) Ø Attitude that significant radiological events can’t happen at SSES 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 18

What Have We Learned Ø Particle assessments focused on actual doses versus potential doses

What Have We Learned Ø Particle assessments focused on actual doses versus potential doses (Root Cause 2) Ø Inadequate pre-job plans were developed for the FPCO project for the control of particles (Root Cause 4) 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 19

What Have We Learned Ø We need to improve control of radioactive material on

What Have We Learned Ø We need to improve control of radioactive material on refueling floor and in potentially impacted systems 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 20

What Have We Learned Ø The associated vacuuming and filtration of the cask storage

What Have We Learned Ø The associated vacuuming and filtration of the cask storage pit (CSP) were less than adequate to control the DRP source term. Ø Rinsing of all items that were removed from the CSP and fuel pools was not performed for every evolution. 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 21

What Have We Learned Ø Need to structure pre-job briefings for hot particle control

What Have We Learned Ø Need to structure pre-job briefings for hot particle control zone (HPCZ) work Ø Need specific RWPs for HPCZ work Ø Need to consider the use of respiratory protection to prevent the intake of particles 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 22

What Have We Learned Ø Radiation Protection Technicians needed more training on DRP survey

What Have We Learned Ø Radiation Protection Technicians needed more training on DRP survey and containment techniques Ø Self-assessment program was not sufficiently risk-oriented 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 23

Corrective Actions Ø Revised RP procedures to enhance radiological controls Ø Survey techniques Ø

Corrective Actions Ø Revised RP procedures to enhance radiological controls Ø Survey techniques Ø Labeling and posting Ø Dose rate limits and dress requirements Ø Control of radioactive material 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 24

Corrective Actions Ø Treat high risk/high consequence evolutions as special evolutions Ø Add management

Corrective Actions Ø Treat high risk/high consequence evolutions as special evolutions Ø Add management oversight for high risk activities Ø Focus self-assessment program 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 25

Summary Ø Be proactive to potential conditions rather than reactive to emergent conditions Ø

Summary Ø Be proactive to potential conditions rather than reactive to emergent conditions Ø When the mindset exists that “it can’t happen here, ” it will 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 26

INPO Ø SER 4 -98 addressed precursors for unplanned exposures Ø Three of the

INPO Ø SER 4 -98 addressed precursors for unplanned exposures Ø Three of the root causes aligned with the SER precursors 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 27

INPO SER 4 -98: Common Event Precursors Ø Ø Ø Inaccurate or incomplete radiological

INPO SER 4 -98: Common Event Precursors Ø Ø Ø Inaccurate or incomplete radiological surveys Inadequate work planning and radiation work permits Incorrect guidance provided by radiological protection technicians Non-compliance with radiological protection rules Ineffective supervisory and management direction and oversight 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 28

Defense in Depth Ø Strong management Ø Comprehensive planning Ø Accurate risk perception Ø

Defense in Depth Ø Strong management Ø Comprehensive planning Ø Accurate risk perception Ø Culture of awareness and risk control Ø Good measurement processes 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 29

QUESTIONS? 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 30

QUESTIONS? 5/19/2021 PPL Susquehanna LLC 30