Direct perception Ecological realism and perceptionaction PJ Treffner
- Slides: 17
Direct perception: Ecological realism and perception-action PJ Treffner metaffordance. com click
Dynamic occlusion: Accretion & deletion of optical structure (Gibson, 1969) Deletion of optical structure by moving surface specifies: 1) an edge 2) moving object is NEARER
Dynamic occlusion: Accretion & deletion of optical structure 2 Deletion of optical structure by stationary surface specifies: 1) an edge 2) moving object is FARTHER
Dynamic occlusion: Accretion & deletion of optical structure Deletion (hiding) and accretion (revealing) of optical structure specifies edges of an object.
Dynamic occlusion: Accretion & deletion of optical structure We do not need an edge to see an edge! The information for an edge is NOT an edge! The information for an edge is a higher-order relation in the optic array.
Deletion & accretion of optical structure Deletion & accretion specifies: 1) edges 2) moving object is NEARER 3) enhanced “ 3 D” effect
We do not need stimulation to perceive existence
Unusual conditions: surprise & attention
Point light displays Link: http: //www. biomotionlab. ca/Demos/BMLwalker. html
Summary: Dynamic occlusion We do not need a line to see a line (the information for a line is not a line) The information for a thing is not the thing We do not need “continuous stimulation” to see that something exists Relative motion is sufficient to experience “depth” (no need to have two eyes to create stereo 3 D, etc) The information specifying reality is a higher-order relation in the optic array
Indirect Perception “Stimulus” “Response” Cue 1 Cue 2 “World” Perception Cue 3 Cue 4 “causes”? ?
Direct Perception (“direct realism” or “ecological approach”) Environmental property or event: affordances Information Perception THE WORLD “is lawfully specific to”
Affordances: the perceived properties of the environment • Information is detected… • but affordances are perceived a) If information is specific to the environment and b) If perception is specific to information then c) perception can be specific to the environment
PERCEPTION-ACTION CYCLE specific to Perception constrains Information Intention. Attention Information constrains Action reveals
Summary: ecological realism • Perception is based on information, not on sensations. The sensations are mere side-effects and irrelevant for an explanation; • The information for a thing is not the thing… • The information consists of higher-order properties, the invariants embedded within the optic array; • The invariants can be detected by suitably attuned and active perceptual system; • Information specifies affordances, the real opportunities for action in the real world. • 2012: Searle finally acknowledges that Gibson “is on the right track”: On action: http: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=c. Cp_Y 9 q. F 2 ok#t=06 m 08 s On Gibson: http: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=c. Cp_Y 9 q. F 2 ok#t=07 m 18 s On direct perception: http: //www. youtube. com/watch? v=c. Cp_Y 9 q. F 2 ok#t=29 m 20 s
- Realism vs anti realism
- Realism vs anti realism
- Realism vs anti realism
- Theories of perception
- Chapter 5 sensation and perception
- Chapter 7 vision and perception
- Tes papi kostick
- Perception and individual decision making
- Gestalt
- Eudemonistic model of health
- Perception and individual decision making
- Subjective perception of vitality and feeling well
- Relative height ap psychology
- Development of binocular vision
- Perception and motivation
- Difference between sensation and perception
- Perception
- Chapter 3 sensation and perception