DIRECCION GENERAL DE DESARROLLO CARRETERO FREIGHT CORRIDOR PROGRAMS

DIRECCION GENERAL DE DESARROLLO CARRETERO FREIGHT CORRIDOR PROGRAMS Presented By: Ing. Juan Jose Erazo Garcia Cano March 18, 2009

INTRODUCTION 1. The North American Region has an important strategy at world level. This region generates 35. 5% of its Net World Product, which translates to 17 trillions of dollars. 2. For the last 25 years, the average percentage of annual growth for international commerce is 6%. 3. The Mexican International Commerce is equivalent to a 54% to its Internal Net Product. 4. 74% of Mexico’s International Commerce is with the United States. 5. For the last 7 years, Mexican Customs has been maintaining its process for International Commerce and even gone up to 13% superior. 6. Time and money for transferring along the border area has nearly gone up to 30% of its costs in exports for logistics. 7. It is important to make the border more efficient, transparent and secure supported with a competitive economy by providing instruments/programs to expedite the process like the C-TPAT, FAST and SENTRI. 8. Mexico has nearly 300 exporters registered at the C-TPAT program, in which, 41% of its total exports are done by this program. 9. Likewise, in the FAST program, nearly 500 certified companies leads 43% of imports and 71% of exports. 10. For the SENTRI program, there about 165, 000 users registered, that means that 7% of trans border traffic is covered by this program.

GENERAL STRATEGY FOR BINATIONAL TRANSPORTATION Develop Strategic Corridors Strengthen Regional Competitiveness Develop Border Infrastructure Secure and efficient operation at the border

1 GENERAL STRATEGY FOR BINATIONAL TRANSPORTATION Develop Strategic Corridors Integrate strategic corridors with sea ports, borders and important cities Secure and efficient operation at the border

PRINCIPAL STRATEGIC CORRIDORS

PROJECTION TO YEAR 2020 MOVEMENT OF TRUCK BETWEEN MEXICO-USA FLUJO DE CAMIONES 2020 100 – 210, 000 – 530, 000 – 1, 100, 000 – 2, 200, 000 Mayor de 2, 200, 000 SOURCE: SCT MEXICO, DIRECCION GENERAL DE DESARROLLO CARRETERO, 2005

SOURCE: Presidencia de la República, México, Programa Nacional de Infraestructura 2007 -2012.

EXPORTS BETWEEN MEXICO & CHINA TO THE UNITED STATES (INDEX YEAR 2000=100) SOURCE: U. S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division, Data Dissemination Branch, Washington, D. C. 20233

Infraestructura carretera SITUATION IN 2006 MAIN HIGHWAY CORRIDORS Tijuana Mexicali Symbol San Luis Río Colorado Ensenada Cd. Juárez Sonoyta Carretera de 2 carriles Nogales Carretera de 4 o más carriles Santa Ana Ciudad Bahía de los Ángeles Hermosillo Capital estatal Piedras Negras Chihuahua Ciudad de México Nava Guerrero Negro Guaymas Nuevo Laredo TRANSVERSALS Loreto Monterrey Torreón Los Mochis Mazatlán-Matamoros Reynosa Manzanillo-Tampico con ramales a Lázaro Cárdenas y Ecuandureo Matamoros Saltillo Culiacán Linares Altiplano Durango La Paz Cabo San Lucas Cd. Victoria Río Grande San José del Cabo Mazatlán Zacatecas México-Tuxpan Matehuala Acapulco-Veracruz Tampico San Luis Potosí Circuito Transístmico Cancún Aguascalientes LONGITUDINALLY Tepic Tuxpan Guanajuato Querétaro Pachuca Guadalajara Transpeninsular de Baja California México-Nogales con ramal a Tijuana Querétaro-Ciudad Juárez Morelia Manzanillo Colima México-Nuevo Laredo con ramal a Piedras Negras Veracruz-Monterrey con ramal a Matamoros Puebla-Oaxaca-Ciudad Hidalgo México-Puebla-Progreso Peninsular de Yucatán Lázaro Cárdenas D. F. Toluca Cuernavaca Chilpancingo Tlaxcala Puebla Mérida Campeche Jalapa Chetumal Veracruz Coatzacoalcos Villahermosa Oaxaca Tuxtla Gutiérrez Acapulco Salina Cruz Arriaga Huixtla Tapachula Ciudad Hidalgo

Infraestructura carretera SITUATION IN 2006 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC Tijuana Mexicali San Luis Río Colorado Ensenada Cd. Juárez Sonoyta Nogales Symbol Santa Ana Bahía de los Ángeles Carretera de 2 carriles Hermosillo Piedras Negras Chihuahua Carretera de 4 o más carriles Nava Guerrero Negro Guaymas Ciudad Nuevo Laredo Capital estatal Loreto Ciudad de México Reynosa Monterrey Torreón Los Mochis Matamoros Saltillo Culiacán Linares Durango La Paz Cabo San Lucas Cd. Victoria Río Grande San José del Cabo Mazatlán Matehuala Zacatecas Tampico San Luis Potosí Cancún Aguascalientes Tepic Tuxpan Guanajuato Querétaro Pachuca Guadalajara Annual Average Daily Traffic Morelia 0 -3, 000 vehículos 3, 000 -5, 000 vehículos 5, 000 -10, 000 vehículos 10, 000 -20, 000 vehículos 20, 000 en adelante vehículos Manzanillo Colima Lázaro Cárdenas D. F. Toluca Cuernavaca Chilpancingo Tlaxcala Puebla Mérida Campeche Jalapa Chetumal Veracruz Coatzacoalcos Villahermosa Oaxaca Tuxtla Gutiérrez Acapulco Salina Cruz Arriaga Huixtla Tapachula Ciudad Hidalgo

2 GENERAL STRATEGY FOR BINATIONAL TRANSPORTATION Strengthen Regional Competitiveness Secure and efficient operation at the border

Infraestructura carretera VISION 2012: INTRA-REGIONAL CORRIDORS 1 4 15. - Calvillo-San Luis Potosí 16. - Acapulco-Zihuatanejo 3 2 5 7 6 8 12 9 10 1. 2. - Mexicali- Chapala San Luis Río Colorado-Guaymas 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. - Santa Ana - Agua Prieta Puerto Peñasco-Sonoyta Topolobampo-Ojinaga Badiraguato-Parral Acuña-Saltillo Matamoros - Ciudad Victoria 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. - Durango-Tepic Zacatecas-Ruiz Aguascalientes Tepic Saltillo-Cihuatlán Durango-Zacatecas-San Luis Potosí San Juan del Río -Ebano Calvillo-San Luis Potosí 11 17. - Villahermosa-Comitán 18. - Tulúm-Coba 19. - Atlacomulco-San Juan del Río. Ixmiquilpan-Pachuca 20. - Puebla-Tulancigo con Ramal a Amozoc 21. - Toluca-Zitacuaro 22. - El Chihue-San Luis Potosí 23. - Salina Cruz-Huatulco 24. - Tuxtla Gutiérrez-San Cristóbal de las Casas 25. - San Cristóbal de la Casas-Palenque 22 13 15 14 19 18 20 21 16 17 23 24 25

Infraestructura carretera VISION 2012: PRINCIPAL PROJECTS FOR INTRA-REGIONAL CORRIDORS 21 INTERSECTIONAL 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 25 22 15 19 INTRA-REGIONAL 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. Ruíz, Nay. – Zacatecas, Zac. Badiraguato, Sin. -Parral, Chih. Aguascalientes, Ags. – Tepic, Nay. Angel Albino Corzo – Siltepec Durango (Dgo. ) – Tepic (Nay. ) Los Herrera – Tamazula, Dgo. Arramberi (N. L. )–Villa Hidalgo Puerto Peñasco-Golfo Santa Clara Topolobampo (Sin. )–Ojinaga (Chih. ) Las Margarita – Nuevo Momon – San Quintin Motozintla - Niquivil – Barrio Carrizal, Chis Aboreachi – Morelos, Chih. La Estancia (Hgo. ) – Pacula, (Qro. ) Km. 89+000 E. C. (Mitla–Zacatepec)–Santa Maria Yacochi, Lim Edo. Ver/Oax. 28. San Felipe – Tilpan – San José Independencia, Oax 29. Km. 30+400 E. C. (Miahuatlan –San Jose Lachiguiri) – San Andrés Mixtepec – Santa Catarina Quioquitani 30. Camino viejo a la Huasteca (San Diego–E. C. (Huejutla–Platón Sánchez)) 11 1 20 18 14 13 16 5 Durango-Mazatlán, Entronque Otinapa-Concordia Nuevo Necaxa-Ávila Camacho La Venta-Colegio Militar Mitla-Tehuantepec Tuxpan-Tampico y Libramiento de Tampico Atizapán-Atlacomulco Libramiento Sur de Guadalajara Arriaga-Ocozocuautla La Ventosa-Acayucan Arriaga-La Ventosa Zacatecas-Saltillo Arco Norte de ZMVM Río Verde – Ciudad Valles 30 26 7 2 12 6 3 28 27 4 9 8 29 Road Projects 23 17 10 24 Situación actual En construcción Simbol Por licitación Carretera de 2 carriles En planeación Carretera de 4 o más carriles

VISION 2012: SECUNDARY AND INTRA-REGIONAL CORRIDORS Puente Internacional Tijuana Mexicali San Luis Río Colorado Ensenada Cd. Juárez Sonoyta Nogales Santa Ana Bahía de los Ángeles Hermosillo Piedras Negras Chihuahua Nava Guerrero Negro Guaymas Simbol Nuevo Laredo Puente Internacional Loreto Monterrey Reynosa Torreón Los Mochis Culiacán Capital estatal Linares Durango La Paz Cabo San Lucas San José del Cabo Mazatlán Zacatecas Ciudad de México Cd. Victoria Río Grande Carretera de 4 o más carriles Ciudad Matamoros Saltillo Carretera de 2 carriles Matehuala Tampico San Luis Potosí Cancún Aguascalientes Tepic Tuxpan Guanajuato Querétaro Pachuca Guadalajara Morelia Troncal Interegional Manzanillo Colima D. F. Toluca Tlaxcala Puebla Mérida Campeche Jalapa Cuernavaca Lázaro Cárdenas Chilpancingo Chetumal Veracruz Coatzacoalcos Villahermosa Oaxaca Tuxtla Gutiérrez Acapulco Salina Cruz Arriaga Huixtla Tapachula Ciudad Hidalgo

3 GENERAL STRATEGY FOR BINATIONAL TRANSPORTATION Develop Border Infrastructure Secure and efficient operation at the border

STRATEGY FOR BRIDGES AND BORDER CROSSINGS • The strategy to modernize the existing border crossings has 2 directions. SCT’s STRATEGY MODERNIZE EXISTING PORTS WIDEING INFRASTRUCTURE BUILD NEW PORTS PUBLIC INV. ADD EXPRESS LANES PRIVATE INV. MODERNIZE ACCESS IMPLEMENT APPLICATIONS AND TECNOLOGIES

DAILY AVERAGE WAIT TIME IN PORTS SELECTED IN MEXICO AND CANADA SOURCE: Elaboración propia con base en “Transportation Statistics Annual Report 2005, Customs and Border Protection, personal communication, April 2005. ” CANADA incluye: Port Huron-Bluewater Bridge, MI; Blaine-Pacific Highway, WA; Detroit-Ambassador Bridge, MI; Buffalo/Niagara Falls-Peace Bridge, NY; Champlain, NY; Sumas, WA; Buffalo/Niagara Falls-Lewiston Bridge, NY; Sweetgrass, MT; Derby Line, VT; Pembina, ND; Houlton, ME; Sault Ste. Marie, MI; Highgate Springs, VT; Detroit-Windsor Tunnel, MI; Calais-Ferry Point, ME; Jackman, ME MEXICO incluye: Laredo-World Trade Bridge, TX; Nogales-Mariposa, AZ; Otay Mesa, CA; El Paso-Ysleta, TX; Brownsville-Veterans International, TX; Hidalgo/Pharr, TX; Calexico-East, CA; Tecate, CA; El Paso-Bridge of the Americas (BOTA), TX; Laredo-Colombia Solidarity, TX; Del Rio, TX; Rio Grande City, TX; Brownsville-Los Indios, TX; Santa Teresa, NM; Progreso, TX; Presidio, TX; Eagle Pass–Bridge I, TX

DAILY AVERAGE WAIT TIME AT PORTS OF ENTRY SELECTED IN MEXICO SOURCE: Elaboración propia con base en “Transportation Statistics Annual Report 2005, Customs and Border Protection, personal communication, April 2005. ”

INSPECTION RANGES 2002 -2006 BY “CBP” BY DIFFERENT MODES OF TRANSPORTATION SOURCE: CBP, Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) , Cost/Benefit Survey, Report of Results 2007

MAYOR FLOWS AT BORDER ZONES BETWEEN MEXICO-USA NORTH BORDER TIJUANA – SAN DIEGO MEXICALI - CALEXICO NOGALES - NOGALES CD. JUAREZ – EL PASO P. NEGRAS – EAGLE PASS N LAREDO, COLOMBIA - LAREDO REYNOSA - MCALLEN MATAMOROS-BROWNSVILLE

ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRUCK TRAFFIC AT 8 PRINCIPALS BORDER PORTS and MAX. CAPACITY SOURCE: SCT. “ANALISIS DE LA NECESIDAD DE AMPLIACION DE LA CAPACIDAD EN LOS PRINCIPALES PUERTOS DE CARGA DE LA FRONTERA NORTE. INCLUYE TIJUANA, MEXICALI, NOGALES, CD. JUAREZ, P. NEGRAS, N. LAREDO, REYNOSA Y MATAMOROS

PORCENTAGE OF SATURATION AT “ 8” PRINCIPALES COMMERCIAL PORTS FUENTE: SCT. “ANALISIS DE LA NECESIDAD DE AMPLIACION DE LA CAPACIDAD EN LOS PRINCIPALES PUERTOS DE CARGA DE LA FRONTERA NORTE. INCLUYE TIJUANA, MEXICALI, NOGALES, CD. JUAREZ, P. NEGRAS, N. LAREDO, REYNOSA Y MATAMOROS

EXAMPLE OF AN INTEGRAL APPLICATION OF SCT’s STRATEGY AT THE BORDER SENTRI PROGRAM Puente Reynosa - Hidalgo FAST PROGRAM Puente Reynosa - Pharr BOTTLE NECK SOLUTIONS & ITS * Libramiento Sur Reynosa Acceso al puente Pharr Proyecto de Aplicación ITS NEW BRIDGES Puente Reynosa - Anzaldúas Acceso al puente Anzaldúas Puente Río Bravo - Donna Acceso al puente Donna URBAN CONST. Circuito Interior Reynosa

DIRECCION GENERAL DE DESARROLLO CARRETERO THANK YOU ! Ing. Juan José Erazo Garcia Cano Director of Multimodal and Border Infrastructure Projects Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes Dirección General de Desarrollo Carretero Insurgentes Sur #1089, Piso #10 Col. Noche Buena Del. Benito Juárez 03720 México, D. F. Teléfono: 52 (55) 5482 -4367 jerazog@sct. gob. mx