Digital Electronic Tests at JYFL Pete Jones University

  • Slides: 23
Download presentation
Digital Electronic Tests at JYFL Pete Jones, University of Jyväskylä SAGE / LISA Kick-Off

Digital Electronic Tests at JYFL Pete Jones, University of Jyväskylä SAGE / LISA Kick-Off Meeting Daresbury Laboratory, 2 nd September 2005 • • Introduction Synchronisation Tests / TDR Integration Phase I Detector Tests Clover Tests

TNT 2

TNT 2

TNT 2

TNT 2

Synchronisation • TNT uses 100 MHz clock, but currently cannot be used as a

Synchronisation • TNT uses 100 MHz clock, but currently cannot be used as a ”slave” – Use sync pulses from TDR metronome – Use pseudo-random pulse generator into both TDR and TNT – Merge / Time differences offline

Syncronisation Results • • • Pseudo-random generator shows 0. 6 x 10 -6 cannot

Syncronisation Results • • • Pseudo-random generator shows 0. 6 x 10 -6 cannot be corellated TNT ”dead-time” ~1. 8% (10 k. Hz input) : < 4 us pulses Dead time possible in both systems

In Beam Tests • Idea : Test both analogue and digital electronics in real

In Beam Tests • Idea : Test both analogue and digital electronics in real situation • Test effects of counting rates • Performance more realistic than with sources (multiplicity) • Idea of what kind of gamma-ray array need would be for the future

Test Reaction • 107, 109 Ag(36 Ar, 2 p 2 n)139 Eu • •

Test Reaction • 107, 109 Ag(36 Ar, 2 p 2 n)139 Eu • • 160 Me. V β~2. 5% Ib=5 – 50 pn. A Ge count rate 10 -100 k. Hz RITU Gas counter 1 -10 k. Hz

Phase 1 Tests Ge 1 Ge 2 BGO 1 BGO 2 SYNC/RESYNC

Phase 1 Tests Ge 1 Ge 2 BGO 1 BGO 2 SYNC/RESYNC

Threshold of Digital vs Analogue Lower threshold . . but. . . Higher Background

Threshold of Digital vs Analogue Lower threshold . . but. . . Higher Background (veto)

Analogue : Effect of Rate (pileup) 100 k. Hz 50 k. Hz 10 k.

Analogue : Effect of Rate (pileup) 100 k. Hz 50 k. Hz 10 k. Hz

Phase 1 : Analogue

Phase 1 : Analogue

Phase 1 : Analogue

Phase 1 : Analogue

Phase 1 : Digital

Phase 1 : Digital

Phase 1 : Digital

Phase 1 : Digital

Phase 1 Tests : Summary • Analogue limited by pileup & resolution • Digital

Phase 1 Tests : Summary • Analogue limited by pileup & resolution • Digital offers lower energy thresholds • Veto handling in digital needs some work, as does marking of data • Digital solution improves counting rate up to 40 -50 k. Hz

Clover Tests Angle 1 : 69. 2 o EUROGAM II = 75. 5 o

Clover Tests Angle 1 : 69. 2 o EUROGAM II = 75. 5 o Angle 2 : 117. 5 o EUROGAM II = 104. 5 o Target – detector distance same as in EUROGAM II Detector Resolution ~2. 5 ke. V

Angle 1 : 69. 2 o Clover Ge 44

Angle 1 : 69. 2 o Clover Ge 44

Angle 2 : 117. 5 o Clover Ge 23

Angle 2 : 117. 5 o Clover Ge 23

Suppression, Sum & Fold n=2 n=1 Unsup press ”clean”

Suppression, Sum & Fold n=2 n=1 Unsup press ”clean”

Diagonal Crystals 4 1 3 2 E 1+3 E 1 ”clean”

Diagonal Crystals 4 1 3 2 E 1+3 E 1 ”clean”

γ-γ coincidence matrix sum g 713 g 554 g 323 Clover Ph 1

γ-γ coincidence matrix sum g 713 g 554 g 323 Clover Ph 1

Digital Data… 70 k. Hz 50 k. Hz 40 k. Hz 20 k. Hz

Digital Data… 70 k. Hz 50 k. Hz 40 k. Hz 20 k. Hz 10 k. Hz

Summary • • Instrument Digital Electonics into TDR : Need some ”TDR” compatability Digital

Summary • • Instrument Digital Electonics into TDR : Need some ”TDR” compatability Digital electronics : – seems work well with phase 1, and improves counting capability – Offer lower thresholds – Need some work on veto / data • Clover detector gives as good performance as phase 1 – More efficient – Digital problems need to be solved