Dialogue Mapping Revealing the Deep Structure of Conversations

  • Slides: 35
Download presentation
Dialogue Mapping: Revealing the Deep Structure of Conversations Dr. Jeff Conklin Cog. Nexus Institute

Dialogue Mapping: Revealing the Deep Structure of Conversations Dr. Jeff Conklin Cog. Nexus Institute cognexus. org 1

Overview n n Opportunity Driven Problem Solving Wicked problems Surface Structure – how we

Overview n n Opportunity Driven Problem Solving Wicked problems Surface Structure – how we communicate about an issue Deep structure – the organization of the content n Linear Process & Media Non-linear Process & media Dialogue Mapping: mapping linear process into non-linear media © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 2

Work is planned as a linear process … Gather the data about the problem

Work is planned as a linear process … Gather the data about the problem Analyze the data Formulate a solution Implement it Time © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 3

… but cognition is non-linear. Guindon, R. (1990) “Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic

… but cognition is non-linear. Guindon, R. (1990) “Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts”, Human. Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, pp. 305 -344. “Opportunity Driven” Problem Solving Time © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 4

Key Characteristic of “Wicked” Problems Conklin, J. (2006) “Wicked Problems and Social Complexity”, white

Key Characteristic of “Wicked” Problems Conklin, J. (2006) “Wicked Problems and Social Complexity”, white paper, Chapter 1 of Dialogue Mapping book Every proposed solution … reveals aspects of the problem … that cause revision of the solution Problem wickedness trumps linear process © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 5

Characteristics of problem “wickedness” n n n n cannot be easily defined so that

Characteristics of problem “wickedness” n n n n cannot be easily defined so that all stakeholders agree on the problem to solve; require complex judgments about the level of abstraction at which to define the problem; have no clear stopping rules; have better or worse solutions, not right and wrong ones; have no objective measure of success; require iteration-every trial counts; have no given alternative solutions-these must be discovered; often have strong moral, political or professional dimensions. © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 6

Some consequences of not distinguishing wicked problems n n n n Less clarity and

Some consequences of not distinguishing wicked problems n n n n Less clarity and agreement about the problem space More non-linear problem solving process Less productive communication More fragmented and polarized stakeholders Less trust, more blame and second-guessing More power and politics dominate the process Deeper issues go unaddressed (avoidance, denial) © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 7

Issue Mapping IBIS - Issue Based Information System n Horst Rittel n Basic argumentation

Issue Mapping IBIS - Issue Based Information System n Horst Rittel n Basic argumentation structure: n – Questions (issues) – Answers (options, alternatives) – Pros & Cons (arguments) © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 8

Conversational structure versus Issue structure The basic unit of conversation is a ‘comment’ a

Conversational structure versus Issue structure The basic unit of conversation is a ‘comment’ a comment The structure of conversation is ‘turn taking’ – each person’s comment follows the one before © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 9

Conversational structure Structure based on individual judgments of relevance and importance Issue-based structure Structure

Conversational structure Structure based on individual judgments of relevance and importance Issue-based structure Structure based on mapper’s judgments about implicit relationships among comments © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 10

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 11

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 11

Conversational structure Issue-based structure Issue mapper infers the question that the comment addresses ©

Conversational structure Issue-based structure Issue mapper infers the question that the comment addresses © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 12

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 13

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 13

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 14

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 14

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 15

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 15

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 16

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 16

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 17

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 17

Conversational structure Issue-based structure Again, inferring the ‘missing’ question clarifies the map © 2008

Conversational structure Issue-based structure Again, inferring the ‘missing’ question clarifies the map © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 18

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 19

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 19

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 20

Conversational structure Issue-based structure © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 20

Conversational structure Structure based on individual choices about relevance and importance Issue-based structure Structure

Conversational structure Structure based on individual choices about relevance and importance Issue-based structure Structure based on mapper’s judgments about implicit relationships among comments © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 21

Meeting notes Which structure is more coherent? Which structure is more meaningful? Issue Map

Meeting notes Which structure is more coherent? Which structure is more meaningful? Issue Map Which structure better supports exploration of complex topics? http: //www. youtube. com/Dr. Jeff. Conklin © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 22

Linear vs Issue Based Structure Linear structure Issue-based structure Normal surface structure Content deep

Linear vs Issue Based Structure Linear structure Issue-based structure Normal surface structure Content deep structure Traditional, familiar Specialized, dense Chronological: each successive element based on salience & relevance with previous Optimized to minimize load on working memory Elements organized by key questions - sequence factored out Optimized for large scale coherence © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 23

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 24

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 24

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t work well. ” © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 25

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t work well. ” “I’m not so sure. I think the real problem is that Y doesn’t work very well. ” © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 26

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t work well. ” “I’m not so sure. I think the real problem is that Y doesn’t work very well. ” “Yeah. There have been big improvements in X lately. …“ © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 27

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t work well. ” “I’m not so sure. I think the real problem is that Y doesn’t work very well. ” “Yeah. There have been big improvements in X lately. I think we should just implement Plan A, like we discussed months ago!” © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 28

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “The problem is that process X doesn’t work well. ” “I’m not so sure. I think the real problem is that Y doesn’t work very well. ” “Yeah. There have been big improvements in X lately. I think we should just implement Plan A, like we discussed months ago!” “Plan A won’t work, because it doesn’t address process Z. The truth is, Z doesn’t work at all!” © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 29

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “I agree. We need to start over

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “I agree. We need to start over with a new Plan B and start getting upper management input. ” © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 30

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “I agree. We need to start over

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “I agree. We need to start over with a new Plan B and start getting upper management input. ” “Wait a minute. What’s the problem with Z? I thought we had that fixed? ” © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 31

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “I agree. We need to start over

Dialogue map follows the non-linear conversation process “I agree. We need to start over with a new Plan B and start getting upper management input. ” “Wait a minute. What’s the problem with Z? I thought we had that fixed? ” “Z costs too much, and the costs are increasing, and in any case it doesn’t meet the new interoperability standards. ” © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 32

Non-linear cognition means jumping around between issues What is the problem? … What are

Non-linear cognition means jumping around between issues What is the problem? … What are the criteria? … What does ‘xxxxxx’ mean? … What are the facts? … What should we do? … How should we do X? … Time © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 33

Bridging the Structural Gap Surface Structure – how we communicate about an issue Linear

Bridging the Structural Gap Surface Structure – how we communicate about an issue Linear Process & Media Deep structure – the organization Non-linear Process & of the content media We need tools that show both surface & deep structures and the connections between them Article about global warming Map of deep structure of article © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute 34

Cog. Nexus Institute Knowledge Mapping for Nonlinear Processes http: //cognexus. org © 2008 Cog.

Cog. Nexus Institute Knowledge Mapping for Nonlinear Processes http: //cognexus. org © 2008 Cog. Nexus Institute The book 35