Design and Development of Key National Indicator Systems

  • Slides: 16
Download presentation
Design and Development of Key National Indicator Systems: GAO's Study of U. S. and

Design and Development of Key National Indicator Systems: GAO's Study of U. S. and Other Country Experiences Bernice Steinhardt Director, Strategic Issues U. S. Government Accountability Office INTOSAI Working Group on Key National Indicators Helsinki, April 13 -14, 2011

Key National Indicators and Governance in the 21 st Century • U. S. federal

Key National Indicators and Governance in the 21 st Century • U. S. federal government increasingly has to partner with other governments, other levels of government, private and not-for-profit sectors, to achieve results. Examples: • Homeland security • Disaster planning and response • Environmental protection • Public health • Need tools and metrics to link efforts 2

What are Key Indicator Systems? • Comprehensive key indicator systems aggregate essential economic, social,

What are Key Indicator Systems? • Comprehensive key indicator systems aggregate essential economic, social, and environmental indicators into a single, easily-accessible system. • These systems can make it easier to see a more complete, general picture of the condition of a city, region, state, or nation and its progress over time. 3

Key Indicator System - Examples 4

Key Indicator System - Examples 4

5

5

Efforts to Develop National Indicator System for U. S. • GAO, in cooperation with

Efforts to Develop National Indicator System for U. S. • GAO, in cooperation with National Academy of Sciences, convened forum in 2003 to discuss whether and how to create key national indicator system for U. S. • About 100 leaders in accountability, business, education, NGO, government, labor, media, minority, scientific, and statistics communities • Efforts continued over next several years under leadership of National Academies • Independent non-profit organization created in 2007: State of the USA 6

GAO’s Role in National Indicator Efforts • Helped to identify need for key national

GAO’s Role in National Indicator Efforts • Helped to identify need for key national indicator system through forum and reports • Recommended Congress take leadership role in highlighting need for indicator system • Active involvement with OECD in World Forums on Key Indicators • Member of INTOSAI Working Group on Key National Indicators 7

Background of Study • In 2010, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010

Background of Study • In 2010, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (P. L. 111 -148) authorized creation of a key national indicator system for the U. S. • Law also required GAO to study: • How indicator systems are being used, designed and developed • Factors necessary to sustain a system • Potential implications for a U. S. KNI system 8

Scope and Methodology • Building on past work, we examined 20 key indicator systems

Scope and Methodology • Building on past work, we examined 20 key indicator systems in the U. S. , Australia, U. K. , and Switzerland, including 7 in depth: • In U. S. , King County AIMs High (WA); Boston Indicators Project; Virginia Performs • In Australia: Measures of Australia’s Progress; Community Indicators Victoria • In Switzerland: MONET Indicator System • In UK: United Kingdom Government Sustainable Development Indicators • To be selected for an in-depth review, systems had to be (1) comprehensive, (2) in existence for at least 5 years, (3) outcomeoriented, (4) involve a governmental entity as a major partner or user. 9

Key Findings: Purpose and Use • Key indicator systems are used for multiple purposes

Key Findings: Purpose and Use • Key indicator systems are used for multiple purposes • Increasing transparency and public awareness • Fostering civic engagement and collaboration • Monitoring progress, aiding decision making, and promoting accountability 10

11

11

Key Findings: Aspects of Development and Design • Elements of design and development contribute

Key Findings: Aspects of Development and Design • Elements of design and development contribute to the relevance, usefulness and credibility of a system • Consulting experts and stakeholders about purpose and design • Selecting indicators based on relevant and reliable data • Providing disaggregated and comparative data available over time • Finding new ways to collect and use data to fill gaps • Periodic reevaluation and revision of the indicators 12

13

13

Key Findings: Sustaining Support • Sustaining support for indicator systems is a constant challenge

Key Findings: Sustaining Support • Sustaining support for indicator systems is a constant challenge • Stable and diversified funding helps ensure continuity • Need for continued interest on part of sponsors, advisors, and champions • Insulation from political pressure offers protection from perceptions of bias • Continually raising public awareness of a system helps preserve relevance 14

Key Findings: Implications for the U. S. • Implications for how a key national

Key Findings: Implications for the U. S. • Implications for how a key national indicator system could be developed and used in the U. S. • Experts and stakeholders could help define purpose and select content • Existing data sources and technologies could be leveraged • A U. S. key national indicator system could inform federal government strategic planning and decision making • System could be refined over time 15

Related GAO Reports www. gao. gov • Key Indicator Systems: Experiences of Other National

Related GAO Reports www. gao. gov • Key Indicator Systems: Experiences of Other National and Subnational Systems Offer Insights for the United States, (GAO-11 -396), March 2011. • Informing our Nation: Improving How to Assess the Position and Progress of the United States, (GAO-05 -1), Nov. 2004. • 21 st Century Challenges: Reexamining the Base of the Federal Government, (GAO-05 -325 SP), March 2005. 16