Democracy in Social Networks Ralf Bendrath bendrath blogspot

Democracy in Social Networks? Ralf Bendrath bendrath. blogspot. com

Social Networking Platforms • provide a space where – people meet – people create content – people collaborate • public as well as personal spaces – individual identities & roles – public discussions and collaborations • live off the users‘ contributions

Users and Providers • Users provide the real value of any social networking site • Users are the network • Providers provide the infrastructure. • We don‘t really care who they are, we care about our friends. • We are brand agnostic.

The provider as government „The only time one interacts with Facebook as entity is when they are being controlled or punished. Facebook as brand represents surveillance and domination. “ (Fred Stutzman)

A Pretty Mighty Government • • • Can kill us if we don’t use our real names Surveillance bots that track us Secret master key to our locked houses Laws of the land can not be negotiated We don‘t get any share from the revenue But we can be sold instead!

Growing Unease • Feeling of unjust exploitation – Studi. VZ deal: „Where are my 100 €? “ • More private profiles – Decreases the value of the platform as a whole • Protests against changes in TOS • Less or false data provided

Pressure from below? • „Exit“ – just move somewhere else – basis of competition – „market“ behaviour • „Voice“ – start internal and external debates – public pressure – But: no real power, mainly exit threat

Exit? • Network Externalities • If a platform gets big enough, it becomes a network good – e. Bay, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, … – more or less forced to use it • I can‘t take away my data and my friends – data portability and its problems

Regulation? • • Standard for network goods Regulatory Agencies „Product“ Standards Pretty normal for other products and services Would ensure real exit option and strengthen competition

Regulation? • Already there – „unfair and deceptive trade practices“ – privacy and data protection laws • Missing – user rights, e. g. freedom of expression – accessibility – universal service / unbundling data portability

Regulation? • Transnational Spaces – Who should regulate? – State of California, ITU, ICANN? • Who wants the Government of China involved here? – Who would organize the policy development process? – And where?

Oh, we already have a Space! • It is only logical to debate the laws of the land for Facebook on Facebook. • And turn slaves into citizens. • This may just be happening…

Democracy on Facebook? • New terms of use – „Rights and Responsibilities” • Charter of user rights – “Facebook Principles” • User input on drafts • Subject to Popular Vote – Binding (more or less) • Chris Kelly: „Constitutional Documents“

Or Democracy Theater? • • • You have to join Facebook first No comments on the overall process Bad tools No votes on other documents FB retains the right to unilateral changes Voting process defined and implemented by Facebook

Source: Bonneau, Preibusch, Anderson, Clayton, Anderson (2009): Democracy Theatre: Comments on Facebook's Proposed Governance Scheme

Or a good start? • Facebook unilateral changes – What happens when users want to overturn them and vote? • Voting on other documents – Users will demand this • Competitive factor – Will My. Space offer more voting options? • „Language of Democracy“ is contageous

Ralf Bendrath 2009