Delegated Acts Regional Policy Delegated Acts Implementing Acts

Delegated Acts Regional Policy

Delegated Acts Implementing Acts 32(10): Purchase of land combination of TA with FI 33(3)(a): FI complying with standard terms and conditions 33(4): Role, liabilities and responsibilities of bodies implementing FI and selection criteria 33(9): Transfer and management of programme contributions 34(5): Management, control and audit arrangements 35(3): Payments and withdrawal of payments to FI 36(4): Capitalisation of annual instalments for interest rate and guarantee fee subsidies 36(5): Calculating management cost and fees 40(3): Monitoring and reporting Regional Policy 2

32(10): Purchase of land combination of TA with financial instruments Ü Financial instruments financed by the ERDF, the Cohesion Fund and the EAFRD can support investments that include the purchase of land not built on and land built on for an amount of up to 10% of the total eligible expenditure incurred by the financial instrument for individual support provided to final recipients. Ü However, where financial instruments are dedicated to provide support to final recipients in the area of sustainable urban development, this 10% limit will apply at the level of the final beneficiary, and not at the level of the individual final recipient of support. In exceptional and duly justified cases, a higher percentage may be permitted for operations concerning environmental conservation. Ü Grants for technical support, which are combined with a financial instrument in a single operation, should be provided only for the purpose of technical preparation of the prospective investment, i. e. for the benefit of the final recipient to be supported from this operation. Regional Policy 3

33(4): Role, liabilities and responsibilities of bodies implementing FI and selection criteria Ü To comply with applicable Union and national law (e. g. on ESI Funds, state aid, public procurement, money laundering, terrorism) and act with the diligence of a professional manager and in good faith. Ü Choice of final recipients to be transparent, justified on objective grounds and taking into account the potential economic viability of the final recipient (or project). Ü To inform those taking part in an operation receiving contributions from programmes and final recipients of that funding. Ü To provide support from financial instruments to final recipients in a proportionate manner: Preferential treatment of private investors needs to be limited to the minimum necessary. Ü For guarantee products, to establish an appropriate multiplier ratio by way of prudent ex-ante risk assessment for guarantees which can be reviewed provided this is justified by subsequent market conditions. Regional Policy 4

33(4): Role, liabilities and responsibilities of bodies implementing FI and selection criteria Ü Selection criteria: e. g. entitled to carry out relevant implementation tasks under EU and national law, economically and financially viable with adequate capacity, organisational structure and governance, effective and efficient internal control and accounting systems, agreement to being audits by Member states, the Commission and the European Court of Auditors. Ü Award criteria: e. g. prior experience; a robust and credible methodology for selection of financial intermediaries/final recipients; management costs and fees; the ability to raise additional resources and activity; measures to mitigate a possible conflict of interest. Ü Where financial instruments are implemented in accordance with the provisions of Article 33(4)(b)(i) of the CPR, managing authorities can give a mandate to the EIB through a direct award of contract. In this case, the above selection and award criteria are not applicable (e. g. pricing) or considered to be met. Regional Policy 5

34(5): Management, control and audit arrangements Ü MA to ensure that financial instruments comply with Union and national law and the relevant programmes and funding agreements. Ü Eligible expenditure to be evidenced by adequate supporting documentary evidence, to be kept at the appropriate level of the operation until three years after closure (a non-exhaustive list of appropriate supporting documents will be proposed); Ü Management verifications and audits throughout the programming period. Ü An adequate audit trail; for Funds other than EAFRD, audits could be conducted at the level of the final recipients only under specific conditions; audit rights of the ECA and OLAF must not be constrained. Ü For financial instruments implemented by the EIB, MA to mandate a firm operating under a framework contract established by the Commission to carry out on-the-spot verifications or audits on the operation or the management and control systems. Ü Specific provisions are foreseen for Article 33(1)(b) EAFRD FI in the applicable delegated and implementing act on control under EAFRD Regional Policy 6

36(4): Capitalisation of annual instalments for interest rate and guarantee fee subsidies Ü Calculation at the end of the eligibility period for the purpose of the payment of the final balance as the total of discounted payment obligations for the purposes and periods laid down in the CPR, based on the outstanding portfolio under management, in line with state aid terminology. Ü Transfer of the total amount to an escrow account from which they can be drawn down only as required; and Ü Any residual resources left in this escrow account after the maximum period referred to under Article 36(1)(c) of the CPR, or as a result of unexpected winding-up of the instrument before the end of this maximum period, should be used in accordance with the legacy provisions of Article 39 of the CPR. Regional Policy 7

Thank you for your attention! DG Regional Policy – Directorate B, Policy 8 Regional Policy