Defining a person or behaviour as abnormal implies

Defining a person or behaviour as ‘abnormal’ implies something undesirable and requiring change Therefore, we must be careful how we use the term Psychologists need methods for distinguishing ‘normal’ from ‘abnormal’ www. psychlotron. or Definitions of Abnormality

Our definition of abnormality must be objective: – It must not depend on anyone’s opinion or point of view – It should produce the same results whoever applies it It must not be under- or over-inclusive – It must not label as ‘abnormal’ or ‘normal’ behaviours or traits that aren’t www. psychlotron. or Definitions of Abnormality

Four definitions can be asked for in the examination: – Statistical infrequency – Deviation from social norms – Failure to function adequately – Deviation from ideal mental health www. psychlotron. or Definitions of Abnormality

www. psychlotron. or Statistical Infrequency Under this definition, a person’s trait, thinking or behaviour is classified as abnormal if it is rare or statistically unusual. With this definition it is necessary to be clear about how rare a trait or behaviour needs to be before we class it as abnormal

www. psychlotron. or Statistical Infrequency Average IQ in the population is 100 pts. frequency The further from 100 you look, the fewer people you find 70 100 IQ Scores 130

www. psychlotron. or frequency Statistical Infrequency A very small subset of the population (<2. 2%) have an IQ below 70 pts. Such people are statistically rare. We regard them as having abnormally low IQs 70 100 IQ Scores 130

www. psychlotron. or Deviation from Social Norms Under this definition, a person’s thinking or behaviour is classified as abnormal if it violates the (unwritten) rules about what is expected or acceptable behaviour in a particular social group. Their behaviour may: – Be incomprehensible to others – Make others feel threatened or uncomfortable

With this definition, it is necessary to consider: – The degree to which a norm is violated, the importance of that norm and the value attached by the social group to different sorts of violation. – E. g. is the violation rude, eccentric, abnormal or criminal? www. psychlotron. or Deviation from Social Norms

Under this definition, a person is considered abnormal if they are unable to cope with the demands of everyday life. They may be unable to perform the behaviours necessary for day-to-day living e. g. self-care, hold down a job, interact meaningfully with others, make themselves understood etc. www. psychlotron. or Failure to Function Adequately

Rosenhan & Seligman (1989) suggest the following characteristics: – Suffering – Maladaptiveness (danger to self) – Vividness & unconventionality (stands out) – Unpredictability & loss of control – Irrationality/incomprehensibility – Causes observer discomfort – Violates moral/social standards www. psychlotron. or Failure to Function Adequately

Under this definition, rather than defining what is abnormal, we define what is normal/ideal and anything that deviates from this is regarded as abnormal This requires us to decide on the characteristics we consider necessary to mental health www. psychlotron. or Deviation from Ideal Mental health

Psychologists vary, but usual characteristics include: – Positive view of the self – Capability for growth and development – Autonomy and independence – Accurate perception of reality – Positive friendships and relationships – Environmental mastery – able to meet the varying demands of day-to-day situations www. psychlotron. or Deviation from Ideal Mental Health