Day 1 in Bethlehem Naomi and Ruth had

Day 1 in Bethlehem • Naomi and Ruth had returned to Bethlehem in what looked like a bleak future … they would have to depend on family charity and whatever food they could scrounge for themselves • But in the midst of the darkness at the very end of Ruth 1, there was a tiny sliver of light …they arrived in Bethlehem "at the beginning of barley harvest" (Ruth 1: 22) • Naomi saw the progression in her own life as being from fullness to emptiness, but the movement for her people had been the opposite • God’s people had gone from famine as the story opened to the brink of a new harvest in the Promised Land; there was food once again in Bethlehem … God's hand of judgment had been lifted from his people • Now if that trajectory from emptiness to fullness was possible for Naomi's people, perhaps her own future was not as dark as she imagined it to be …

Ruth Chapter 2

Ruth 2: 1 -7 [Now Naomi had a relative of her husband's, a worthy man of the clan of Elimelech, whose name was Boaz. ] 2 And Ruth the Moabite said to Naomi, “Let me go to the field and glean among the ears of grain after him in whose sight I shall find favor. ” And she said to her, “Go, my daughter. ” 3 So she set out and went and gleaned in the field after the reapers, and she happened to come to the part of the field belonging to Boaz, who was of the clan of Elimelech. 4 And behold, Boaz came from Bethlehem. And he said to the reapers, “The LORD be with you!” And they answered, “The LORD bless you. ” 5 Then Boaz said to his young man who was in charge of the reapers, “Whose young woman is this? ” 6 And the servant who was in charge of the reapers answered, “She is the young Moabite woman, who came back with Naomi from the country of Moab. 7 She said, ‘Please let me glean and gather among the sheaves after the reapers. ’ So she came, and she has continued from early morning until now, except for a short rest. ”

Ruth 2: 1 “Now Naomi had a relative of her husband's, a worthy man (gibbor hayil) of the clan of Elimelech, whose name was Boaz. ” This verse a giant parenthesis in which one of What clanisof islike Boaz from? What kind man is Boaz? the major characters is introduced. What is being foreshadowed here? Why isis introduced this important? Who behind the scenes? What relation is he to Naomi? • • It. As was state that Naomi had a relative on her wenecessary will see intochapter 3, the social responsibilities of Boaz husband’s side of the family as a redeemer (goel) is determined by his blood relationship • Makes clear that blood relationship of Boaz is with Naomi’s with Elimelech husband not with her since Israelite marriage was endogamous (within a specific ethnic group)

A Worthy Man (Gibbor Hayil) • • Ø Ø The phrase gibbor hayil is difficult to translate into English – The word gibbor comes from root meaning “mighty” and is frequently translated as “warrior” – The word hayil can mean “strength, power, ability, capability, wealth, ” and its meaning depends on context In military setting it refers to warrior, particularly one who has distinguished himself in armed combat In other contexts, it can refer to wealth (2 Kings 15: 20) or ability (1 Kings 11: 28). It designates one who possesses social standing and a good reputation In this context, it connotes not only wealth and status but also ability, honor, and capability; it is clearly used here as a description of character Thus, “A real, substantial man of character” might capture the nuance here

Ruth 2: 2 “And Ruth the Moabite said to Naomi, “Let me go to the field and glean among the ears of grain after him in whose sight I shall find favor. ” And she said to her, “Go, my daughter. ” What practical matters did Naomi and Whatvery help. Ruth’s and encouragement Described emotional statedid on Ruth “Dayand 1” of Ruth need toeach dealother with when they arrived these in Naomi they addressed this newgive life in which sheashas found herself? Bethlehem? practical concerns? • While they returned to Bethlehem because they had heard there was food again, availabilityqualities did not automatically alleviate Whatitscharacter are evident in Ruth’s hunger. Somebody had to “bring theand bacon. ” interactions withhome Naomi in the way she • Whatever the status Elimelech’s (to be discussed later in responds to theofneeds of theproperty moment? Ruth 4), they did not have a crop to harvest or money to buy food from someone else. Moreover, Naomi gave no indication that the nearer kinsman, Boaz, or anyone else was available to help.

Ruth 2: 2 “And Ruth the Moabite said to Naomi, “Let me go to the field and glean among the ears of grain after him in whose sight I shall find favor. ” And she said to her, “Go, my daughter. ” Why do think Naomi stayed behind didyou Naomi not tell Ruth to glean in when the Ruth went out to glean? field of Boaz? Several possibilities come to mind: • Perhaps Naomi did not think Ruth could find her way around town • Maybe after 10 -20 years Naomi did not know where Boaz was or if he was alive • Boaz will later mention a nearer kinsman (Ruth 3: 12) and Naomi may have thought that any hope of help resided with him rather than Boaz • Naomi may have said nothing because no man was legally bound to marry his relative’s widow, & she did not want to raise any false hopes

Sinking into Despair? • It is not clear why Naomi did not also go out and glean; she was perhaps in her fifties at this point in the story and evidenced no obvious crippling disability that made her unable to go out and work • Was there nothing she could have done in the field to help in their need? Two certainly would have been safer than one and might have expected to bring home at least a little more food • She has apparently consumed all her energies in worrying: and has none left to try to do anything that might actually resolve her problems. • Whether or not despair is what drives Naomi's inaction, it is certainly a problem in our own experience • When we stop believing in God’s goodness and give ourselves over to doubt and worry, we easily sink into a despairing activity -- this can lead to a downward spiral in which our inactivity makes our situation worse and deepens our despair, which in turn makes us feel less inclined than ever to step out into what we believe to be a hostile world. • The key to breaking that cycle is grasping hold of God's covenant commitment to do us good. If we can once look to the cross and grasp the height and depth of the love of God for us in Jesus, then how can we doubt his desire to give us everything necessary for life and godliness? • We will still not know what the future holds, yet if we know that the one who holds the future cares for us, that first step upward on the long road back to obedience becomes possible again.

Grain Farming in Israel Harvesting grain involved the following steps: 1. Reaping by cutting the ripened standing grain with hand sickles, usually done by men 2. Binding the grain into sheaves, usually done by women 3. Gleaning, that is, gathering stalks of grain left behind 4. Transporting the sheaves to the threshing floor, often by donkey and sometimes by cart 5. Threshing, that is, loosening the grain from the straw, usually done by treading of cattle, but sometimes by toothed threshing sledges or the wheels of carts 6. Winnowing, done by tossing the grain into the air with winnowing forks so that the wind, which usually came up for a few hours in the afternoon, blew away the straw and chaff, leaving the grain at the winnower’s feet 7. Sifting the grain to remove the residual foreign matter 8. Bagging for transportation and storage

The Law of Gleaning • Deuteronomy 24: 19 -22 institutes the law of gleaning: “When you reap your harvest in your field and forget a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it. It shall be for the sojourner, the fatherless, and the widow, that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work of your hands. When you beat your olive trees, you shall not go over them again. It shall be for the sojourner, the fatherless, and the widow. When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, you shall not strip it afterward. It shall be for the sojourner, the fatherless, and the widow. You shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt; therefore I command you to do this. ” What reasons does God give for being kind to the For whose benefit did the What did God command ininstitute these verses? sojourner, the fatherless and the widow? law of gleaning? What does this reveal about His heart? How should this motivate us?

The Law of Gleaning Leviticus 19: 9 -10 – “When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field right up to its edge, neither shall you gather the gleanings after your harvest. And you shall not strip your vineyard bare, neither shall you gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard. You shall leave them for the poor and for the sojourner: I am the LORD your God. ” In addition to a source of food forgleaning theof Although lawproviding of gleaning was characteristic Whatthe additional provision to athe law of destitute, what other benefits from us the 21 st law the culture of ancient Israel, whatresulted can it teach does this passage stipulate? of gleaning? century American Christians? How was the law of gleaning a kind of “Welfare to Work” program?

Economics as Covenantal Thermometer • These charitable provisions of the law and theology behind them reminded God’s people of their unique status among the nations of world • While everyone had to “make a living” and “put food on the table, ” … making a living was not to consume the attention of God’s people • One could work to meet your financial commitments and still not lose sight of ministering to others in God’s name • God’s provision for His people frees them to look out for the interests of others and thereby treat others as God had treated them Ø Thus, economics had a missional outlook and functioned as a covenantal thermometer to measure the vitality of Israel’s love for God and

Reality of Gleaning • We tend to have idealized images of how gleaning actually worked – we’ve seen lovely pastoral paintings of gentle maidens scooping up armload of golden grain • In reality, gleaners were often mistreated and went home hungry • A landowner might choose to keep them out or eject them if he pleased • Harvesters could get rough • Unattached women were especially at risk and were victimized • Then, of course, gleaners competed with one each other

There’s the Law …then there’s Practice Ø The law may have told God’s people how to live, but it could not coerce godly conduct Job 24: 21 – “They wrong the barren, childless woman, and do no good to the widow. ” Psalm 94: 6 – “They kill the widow and the sojourner, and murder the fatherless Isaiah 1: 23 – “Everyone loves a bribe and runs after gifts. They do not bring justice to the fatherless, and the widow's cause does not come to them. ” Malachi 3: 5 – “Then I will draw near to you for judgment. I will be a swift witness against the sorcerers, against the adulterers, against those who swear falsely, against those who oppress the hired worker in his wages, the widow and the fatherless, against those who thrust aside the sojourner, and do not fear me, says the LORD of hosts. ” Isaiah 10: 2 – “To turn aside the needy from justice and to rob the poor of my people of their right, that widows may be their spoil, and that they make the fatherless their prey!” What dangers did Ruth risk by going out to glean?

How Big is a Corner? How Wide is an Edge? How thoroughly do I want my workers to clear my fields of grain, given the fact what we only have one chance to clear it? How much will I leave behind for the poor? Area for reapers to harvest grain Field is white unto harvest … (remaining green is for gleaners) Why is it easier live by the of the Walking with Godtostretches ourletter capacity for law than by the spirit? sacrifice and our imagination for obedience!!

Ruth 2: 3 “So she set out and went and gleaned in the field after the reapers, and she happened to come to the part of the field belonging to Boaz, who was of the clan of Elimelech. ” The phrase “she happened to come” literally means “and her chance (miqreh) chanced (wayyiqer). ” • Ruth (without any intention to do so) Boaz ends in upthis What fact does the author repeat about • As This is used here as achooses rhetorical device, hyperbolic Ruth goes out and from all the fields of gleaning in the field that belongs to Boaz verse? Why do you think this fact is repeated? irony. Bethlehem, in whose field does “she happen • Thus God, who is constantly working behindtothe • come”? By excessively attributing Ruth’s good fortune to scenes, is pictured as directing and controlling the chance, the phrase points ironically to the opposite, situation through His gracious providence namely, to the sovereignty of God.

Ruth 2: 4 -7 4 And behold, Boaz came from Bethlehem. And he said to the reapers, “The LORD be with you!” And they answered, “The LORD bless you. ” 5 Then Boaz said to his young man who was in charge of the reapers, “Whose young woman is this? ” 6 And the servant who was in charge of the reapers answered, “She is the young Moabite woman, who came back with Naomi from the country of Moab. 7 She said, ‘Please let me glean and gather among the sheaves after the reapers. ’ So she came, and she has continued from early morning until now, except for a short rest. ” How has Ruth alreadything shown that. Ruth would make her to an do? excellent wife? What surprising had requested • • Whatelse is the spiritual tone of reveal the greeting What does the foreman about Boaz Ruth? gives How is thishe of her greetings significant when Humility –his gleaning inexchange the fields was a menial task to fellow workers? What does say about work ethic? Who does Boaz notice? What question does he ask Diligence – gleaning was hard work, requiringclimate much effort for meager return you compare itsay? to the spiritual of Israel What does he his– young foreman about her? Courage she gleaned among workers who might physically attack her during thehis time period ofshout the Judges? What did co-workers back to him in the Initiative – she didn’t wait for God to miraculously provide food for her & Naomi same verse?

A Surprising Request Traditionally, we’ve understood Ruth to be asking permission to glean in Boaz’s field • But this seems unlikely since the law already permitted gleaners … asking permission to glean was akin to asking a traffic cop for permission to walk on the public sidewalk • Remember, when harvesting a field, typically the hired men went first reaping the standing grain stalks with sickles • Female workers followed, gathering and binding cut grain into bundles to be carried to the threshing floor • Gleaners came last and were permitted in the fields only after both teams of hired workers finished and bundled sheaves of grain removed from the field Ø Ruth is actually requesting Boaz to suspend the gleaning practice for her. She didn’t want to pick up leftover scraps for Naomi. She wanted to feed her mother-in-law Ø Ruth asked to “glean and gather among the sheaves after the reapers. ” In other words, Ruth asked to go where gleaners were not permitted, to go among the hired ladies who were binding the grain after the reapers •

Comparison of Major Characters NAOMI & RUTH • Boaz gets the BOAZ shock of his life when a first-time gleaner – a foreigner at that – takes him to a higher level of • Powerful • obedience Powerless & vulnerable • Ruth is pressing Boaz to color outside the lines of his understanding • Wealth & Resources • Poverty hunger. The spirit of of God’s law. The letter of the law says, “let them&glean. ” the • law. Full says, “feed them. ” Two entirely different concepts. • Empty • Ruth’s bold proposal exposes the difference … how would Boaz • Stands on his own • Derive identity & respond to this challenge? significance from men