Data Integration in Process Systems Engineering Status of






























- Slides: 30
Data Integration in Process Systems Engineering Status of the DEXPI and ENPRO projects Michael Wiedau PLT Sommerkolloquium, 26. Juni 2015 Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
Status of the projects • DEXPI - Data Exchange in the process industry • ENPRO - Energy Efficiency in the process industry Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
DEXPI Data Exchange in the Process Industry Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
DEXPI – The Big Idea General exchange standard for the process industry based on ISO 15926, implemented in the next CAE software generation Input from process industry (working party DEXPI ISO 15926): Open and international information model for the entire plant lifecycle Functional Requirements Functional Design Asset Specification Asset in Operation Input from the CAE vendors: § general exchange standard for graphics § export and import functions based on the new information model and graphics standard Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
The DEXPI group Research Aix. CAPE e. V. RWTH Aachen BASF SE Evonik Industries AG Bayer Technology Services Gmb. H Owner Operator conceptual model - best practice file - validator - home page - spec documentation ISO - coordination - requirements - model support - model extension community CAE vendors Autodesk AVEVA Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Bentley Intergraph Siemens - Proteus know-how - ISO know-how - implementation
DEXPI • • International consortium Meeting regularly (every two month in Frankfurt + phone conferences) Activities directly related to ISO 15926 and Fiatech groups Specification publicly available www. dexpi. org Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
DEXPI Tools … • Online verification tools • • Graphics Engineering content • DEXPI Sandbox Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
Phases and documents/objects in the life cycle of a plant Functional Requirements Functional Design design and development of efficient chemical processes require chemical, physical, . . . data – including operational data from existing plants Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Asset Specification information barriers due to insufficient integration of software tools Asset in Operation operation and maintenance require information from design and development phase (Images: ENPRO, Wikipedia, Wikimedia)
ENPRO Energy Efficiency in the Process Industry Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
ENPRO EP 1: Ko. PPon. A EP 3: Modularisation Modular equipment for energy efficient production EP 4: Data-Integration Improving Energy efficiency and process acceleration through information integration for conceptual design to production Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Continuous processes for polymer specialties with the help of new equipment concepts EP 2: SMek. T Smart mini plants for the development of efficient continuous separation processes ENPROConnect Exchange platform for ENPRO
Beispiel: Betriebspunkt einer Pumpe Planung & Bau Simulation Auslegung auf Betriebspunkt Errichtung Inbetriebnahme Tatsächlicher ≠ geplanter Betriebspunkt Betrieb Tatsächlicher Betriebspunkt Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Messung mittels PIMS
phase Phases of the lifecycle Functional Requirements Asset Specification Asset in Operation focus Functional Design • • • Processes Streams • • Equipment types Instrumentation Exemplary structuring of phase-workflows P-4711 V-42 HEX-23 Time Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 • Detailed equipment specifications All disciplines • • Physical objects Not only operation ordering / purchase plant operation
Requirements for life cycle data integration Standards Relations Decisions Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Meta Model Vocabulary Activities
Data Exchange: Existing Approaches • Plant. XML (Evonik) - Exchange format for various resources • STEP - STEP = STandard for the Exchange of Product model data - ISO 10303: “Automation systems and integration — Product data representation and exchange” - Focus on 3 D Information Exchange • CAEX • NAMUR Empfehlungen - NE 100 / NE 150 / IEC 61987 / … - Focus on specific purposes - Huge Lists of Attributes for Objects • ISO 15926 - Complex Meta Model (Part 2), Resource Library (Part 4), Templates (Part 8), … - Proteus. XML – Focus on exchange of P&IDs and 3 D • … Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
Complex Information Model Document Functional Requirements Si io at ul m Revision 1 n Revision 2 Functional Design Revision 1 Revision 2 Document Functional Requirements Functional Design Asset Specification Asset in Operation 15
Complex Information Model Asset in Operation Internal Classification Hierarchy Functional Requirements su r ea M M Data ea su re m em en t Physical Objects Functional Design Asset Specification Asset in Operation 16
Complex Information Model Document Simulation Functional Requirements Document Measurement Functional Design Asset Specification Asset in Operation 17
Datenintegartion Standards müssen zusammenarbeiten! Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
Questionnaire on Data Integration Requirements 1. Usage as discussion guidance in meetings 2. Usage as an Online Survey Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
Datenintegration Strukturen machen aus vielen Teilen ein Großes Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
Thank you for your attention! Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
Research work in progress and outlook • Information Model Patterns - Decisions on design rationale and usage of knowledge Documentation how to integrate other standards Tools for automatic generation of models on template level Application example for Ko. PPon. A project on research level • Questionnaire • Software demonstrator in development - Import of exemplary documents in open formats - Powerful information retrieval functions 22
Conclusion • High progress in development of interfaces for information exchange of P&IDs - Software available in 2016 • Major issues have been solved and all partners agree on roadmap • Intelligent verification process of P&IDs based on semantic-web technologies • Beyond P&IDs: ENPRO initiative for progress in innovative technologies as data integration Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
SFB 476 – The Improve Project „Information Technology Support for Collaborative and Distributed Design Processes in Chemical Engineering“ Transfer Project T 1: • CIB = “Comprehensive Information Base” • Information Consolidation from different Software Tools • Usage of “Semantics” • Problem: - How to retrieve relevant information from proprietary software tools? • Solution: - Usage of EVONIK’s Plant. XML Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
ENPRO example: Ko. PPon. A Miprowa® Lab Given Residence time τ volume flow, reactor length • Number and type of channels • Type of inlays Iterative process Choice of inlay Number and type of channels Source: Ehrfeld Produktkatalog 2012 Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
ENPRO example: Ko. PPon. A Index COIPO = Class of Inanimate Physical Object COROT = Class Of Representation of Thing COIO = Class of Information Object SBR = Specialization By Role SBD = Specialization By Domain COPC = Class Of Parti. Cipation COIBR = Class Of Involvement By Reference COAC = Class Of ACtivity ACT = ACTivity PTRAD = Par. Ticipating Role And Domain RAD = Role And Domain Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
ENPRO example: Ko. PPon. A Index COIPO = Class of Inanimate Physical Object COROT = Class Of Representation of Thing COIO = Class of Information Object SBR = Specialization By Role SBD = Specialization By Domain COPC = Class Of Parti. Cipation COIBR = Class Of Involvement By Reference COAC = Class Of ACtivity ACT = ACTivity PTRAD = Par. Ticipating Role And Domain RAD = Role And Domain Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
ENPRO example: Ko. PPon. A Index COIPO = Class of Inanimate Physical Object COROT = Class Of Representation of Thing COIO = Class of Information Object SBR = Specialization By Role SBD = Specialization By Domain COPC = Class Of Parti. Cipation COIBR = Class Of Involvement By Reference COAC = Class Of ACtivity ACT = ACTivity PTRAD = Par. Ticipating Role And Domain RAD = Role And Domain Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015
DEXPI & ENPRO evaluation • DEXPI Criteria Notes Openness OWL, XML, ISO 15926, Tools Open. Source Extendibility Own rules in Jena. RL etc. Reusability If tool export is implemented Applicability Based on open standards Universality Focus on P&IDs Bottom Up • ENPRO Criteria Notes Openness OWL, ISO 15926 Extendibility Definition of own models, Templates, etc. Reusability Depends on documentation and examples Applicability High abstraction level Universality Covers the most parts of lifecycle Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Combination! Top Down
Life. Cycle coverage of the different projects Functional Requirements Functional Design CIB DEXPI ENPRO Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Asset Specification Asset in Operation