Data assimilation schemes in numerical weather forecasting and

  • Slides: 29
Download presentation
Data assimilation schemes in numerical weather forecasting and their link with ensemble forecasting Gérald

Data assimilation schemes in numerical weather forecasting and their link with ensemble forecasting Gérald Desroziers Météo-France, Toulouse, France

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error statistics § Ensemble assimilation § Impact of observations on analyses and forecasts § Conclusion and perspectives

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error statistics § Ensemble assimilation § Impact of observations on analyses and forecasts § Conclusion and perspectives

Numerical Weather Prediction at Météo-France DX ~ 10 km Global Arpège model : DX

Numerical Weather Prediction at Météo-France DX ~ 10 km Global Arpège model : DX ~ 15 km Arome : DX ~ 2, 5 km

Initial condition problem Observations yo Ebauche xb = M (xa -) État atmosphérique à

Initial condition problem Observations yo Ebauche xb = M (xa -) État atmosphérique à t 0 Prévision état à t 0 + 24 h

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error statistics § Ensemble assimilation § Impact of observations on analyses and forecasts § Conclusion and perspectives

Synops and ships Buoys Radiosondes Pilots and profilers Aircraft ATOVS Satobs Geo radiances SSM/I

Synops and ships Buoys Radiosondes Pilots and profilers Aircraft ATOVS Satobs Geo radiances SSM/I Scatterometer Ozone Data coverage 05/09/03 09– 15 UTC (courtesy J-. N. Thépaut)

Satellites (EUMETSAT)

Satellites (EUMETSAT)

Satellite data sources (courtesy J-. N. Thépaut, ECMWF)

Satellite data sources (courtesy J-. N. Thépaut, ECMWF)

General formalism § Statistical linear estimation : xa = xb + dx = xb

General formalism § Statistical linear estimation : xa = xb + dx = xb + K d = xb + BHT (HBHT+R)-1 d, with d = yo – H (xb ), innovation, K, gain matrix, B et R, covariances of background and observation errors, § H is called « observation operator » (Lorenc, 1986), § It is most often explicit, § It can be non-linear (satellite observations) § It can include an error, § Variational schemes require linearized and adjoint observation operators, § 4 D-Var generalizes the notion of « observation operator » .

Statistical hypotheses § Observations are supposed un-biased: E(eo) = 0. § If not, they

Statistical hypotheses § Observations are supposed un-biased: E(eo) = 0. § If not, they have to be preliminarly de-biased, § or de-biasing can be made along the minimization (Derber and Wu, 1998; Dee, 2005; Auligné, 2007). § Oservation error variances are supposed to be known ( diagonal elements of R = E(eoeo. T) ). § Observation errors are supposed to be un-correlated : ( non-diagonal elements of E(eoeo. T) = 0 ), § but, the representation of observation error correlations is also investigated (Fisher, 2006).

Implementation § Variational formulation: minimization of J(dx) = dx. T B-1 dx + (d-H

Implementation § Variational formulation: minimization of J(dx) = dx. T B-1 dx + (d-H dx)T R-1 (d-H dx) § Computation of J’: development and use of adjoint operators § 4 D-Var : generalized observation operator H : addition of forecast model M. § Cost reduction : low resolution increment dx (Courtier, Thépaut et Hollingsworth, 1994)

4 D-Var : principle obs Jo « old » forecast analysis Jo obs xb

4 D-Var : principle obs Jo « old » forecast analysis Jo obs xb Jb xa 9 h obs corrected forecast Jo 12 h Assimilation window 15 h

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error statistics § Ensemble assimilation § Impact of observations on analyses and forecasts § Conclusion and perspectives

A posteriori diagnostics § Is the system consistent? § We should have § but

A posteriori diagnostics § Is the system consistent? § We should have § but also E[J(xa) ] = p, p = total number of observations, E[Joi(xa) ] = pi – Tr(Ri-1/2 H i A H i. T Ri-1/2 ), pi : number of observations associated with Joi (Talagrand, 1999). § Computation of optimal E[Joi(xa) ] by a Monte-Carlo procedure is possible. (Desroziers et Ivanov, 2001).

Application : optimisation of R ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ E[Joi (xa)] = (E[Joi

Application : optimisation of R ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ E[Joi (xa)] = (E[Joi (xa)])opt. ∙ ∙ ∙ One tries to obtain by adjusting the soi Optimisation of HIRS ∙ ∙∙ (Chapnik, et al, 2004; Buehner, 2005) so

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error statistics § Ensemble assimilation § Impact of observations on analyses and forecasts § Conclusion and perspectives

Ensemble of perturbed analyses § Simulation of the estimation errors along analyses and forecasts.

Ensemble of perturbed analyses § Simulation of the estimation errors along analyses and forecasts. § Documentation of error covariances – over a long period (a month/ a season), – for a particular day. (Evensen, 1997; Fisher, 2004; Berre et al, 2007)

Ensembles Based on a perturbation of observations The same analysis equation and (sub-optimal) operators

Ensembles Based on a perturbation of observations The same analysis equation and (sub-optimal) operators K and H are involved in the equations of xa and ea: xa = (I – KH) xb + K xo ea = (I – KH) eb + K eo The same equation also holds for the analysis perturbation: pa = (I – KH) pb + K po

Background error standard-deviations Over a month Vorticity at 500 h. Pa For a particular

Background error standard-deviations Over a month Vorticity at 500 h. Pa For a particular date 08/12/2006 00 H Vorticity at 500 h. Pa

Ensemble assimilation: errors 08/12/2006 06 UTC 500 h. Pa vorticity error surface pressure

Ensemble assimilation: errors 08/12/2006 06 UTC 500 h. Pa vorticity error surface pressure

Ensemble assimilation: errors 15/02/2008 12 UTC 850 h. Pa vorticity error (shaded) sea surface

Ensemble assimilation: errors 15/02/2008 12 UTC 850 h. Pa vorticity error (shaded) sea surface level pressure (isoligns) (Montroty, 2008)

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error statistics § Ensemble assimilation § Impact of observations on analyses and forecasts § Conclusion and perspectives

Measure of the impact of observations § Total reduction of estimation error variance: r

Measure of the impact of observations § Total reduction of estimation error variance: r = Tr(K H B) § Reduction due to observation set i : ri = Tr(Ki Hi B) § Variance reduction normalized by B : ri. DFS = Tr(Ki Hi) § Reduction of error projected onto a variable/area: ri. P = Tr(P Ki Hi B PT) § Reduction of error evolved by a forecast model: ri. PM = Tr(P M Ki Hi B MT PT) = Tr(L Ki Hi B LT) (Cardinali, 2003; Fisher, 2003; Chapnik et al, 2006)

Randomized estimates of error reduction on analyses and forecasts It can be shown that

Randomized estimates of error reduction on analyses and forecasts It can be shown that This can be estimated by a randomization procedure: where is a vector of observation perturbations and the corresponding perturbation on the analysis. (Fisher, 2003; Desroziers et al, 2005)

Degree of Freedom for Signal (DFS) 01/06/2008 00 H

Degree of Freedom for Signal (DFS) 01/06/2008 00 H

Error variance reduction % of error variance reduction for T 850 h. Pa by

Error variance reduction % of error variance reduction for T 850 h. Pa by area and observation type (Desroziers et al, 2005)

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error

Outline § Numerical weather prediction § Data assimilation § A posteriori diagnostics: optimizing error statistics § Ensemble assimilation § Impact of observations on analyses and forecasts § Conclusion and perspectives

Conclusion and perspectives § Importance of the notion of « observation operator » :

Conclusion and perspectives § Importance of the notion of « observation operator » : - most often explicit, - rarely statistical § Large size problems : - state vector : ~ 10^7 - observations : ~ 10^6 § – – – Ensemble assimilation: estimation error covariances measure of the impact of observations link with Ensemble forecasting (~ 40 members of +96 h forecasts)