Curriculum Evaluation Reverend Dr David Taylor Director of

  • Slides: 29
Download presentation
Curriculum Evaluation Reverend Dr David Taylor Director of Quality Enhancement School of Medical Education

Curriculum Evaluation Reverend Dr David Taylor Director of Quality Enhancement School of Medical Education University of Liverpool

And minister of St. Michael and All Angels, Altcar

And minister of St. Michael and All Angels, Altcar

Why me? n n I am responsible for quality enhancement of the medical school

Why me? n n I am responsible for quality enhancement of the medical school I am a visitor for the UK General Medical Council

Evaluation of n n n Course components Course/programme Staff

Evaluation of n n n Course components Course/programme Staff

Two Considerations n Process What n How well n n Product Outcomes n Knowledge,

Two Considerations n Process What n How well n n Product Outcomes n Knowledge, skills and attitudes n Fit for purpose n

Process in the UK n Internal n n All components of the course University

Process in the UK n Internal n n All components of the course University Annual programme monitoring n Periodic review (every 5 years) n n External – the General Medical Council n Twice in any 10 year period

Internal GMC University

Internal GMC University

Internal n Process (Quantitative and qualitative) Student evaluation of components n Student evaluation of

Internal n Process (Quantitative and qualitative) Student evaluation of components n Student evaluation of teaching staff n Staff evaluation of components n n Product n Student performance in assessment n Against definable/defendable standards

Annual n Based on a Self-evaluation document under 9 headings n n n n

Annual n Based on a Self-evaluation document under 9 headings n n n n n Introduction Progress from last years actions Feedback from staff Feedback from students Feedback from most recent graduates Programme information External examiners reports and action on them Areas of good practice Statistical commentary

Periodic Review n Every 5 years the course is reviewed by a senior team

Periodic Review n Every 5 years the course is reviewed by a senior team n n n n Aims and outcomes Curriculum Assessment Enhancement Learning and teaching Student progression Learning resources

External - GMC n n n n Basic information and committee structures Curricular outcomes,

External - GMC n n n n Basic information and committee structures Curricular outcomes, content and structure Delivering the curriculum Student support guidance and feedback Assessing student performance Student health and conduct Reflecting modern society

How to make sure the plan comes together David Taylor Liverpool

How to make sure the plan comes together David Taylor Liverpool

In the UK there is little flexibility n The GMC have produced two documents

In the UK there is little flexibility n The GMC have produced two documents Tomorrow’s Doctors n The New Doctor n n Between them they define what we have to make sure the students know

Our handbook gives a generic syllabus n Subject knowledge & understanding n n As

Our handbook gives a generic syllabus n Subject knowledge & understanding n n As ‘core’, students will be able to synthesize, appraise, explain, and apply the relevant information/evidence about: the structure and mechanisms of the body in health and disease, from molecules up to the whole organism related to: n n normal and abnormal structure and function of the body and its defence mechanisms; the natural history, symptoms, and signs of disease; and the biological rationale for therapy and the processes underlying its complications variability in the role of the determinants of health and disease, the presentation of disease, and the response to therapy clinical diagnosis and management of common conditions The interrelationships of social, psychological, economic, political, environmental, cultural factors on health and disease

Our first step n Was to decide which 200 cases a student would need

Our first step n Was to decide which 200 cases a student would need to be familiar with when they graduated n We finally agreed on about 208

Core Cases

Core Cases

Then n We decided which cases the students would study through PBL

Then n We decided which cases the students would study through PBL

PBL modules

PBL modules

Scenario

Scenario

Then n The students determine the learning objectives in their PBL groups – they

Then n The students determine the learning objectives in their PBL groups – they can see every groups’ learning objectives

Learning objectives

Learning objectives

Which we examine

Which we examine

Each year We review the cases in the light of the learning objectives the

Each year We review the cases in the light of the learning objectives the students are obtaining n And the examination results n And change the cases accordingly n Or even the course! n

As part of a long term project n n We compared the supervisors view

As part of a long term project n n We compared the supervisors view of the competencies of the graduates from our traditional course and the first cohort of our new curriculum students A series of papers are coming out this summer (winter…)

Each year n We review the content of one of the four subject themes

Each year n We review the content of one of the four subject themes n n n Structure and function Individuals, groups and societies Population perspective Professional and personal development A senior committee of subject specialists does the initial work Then the programme team makes the agreed changes

Periodic review n n 2006 2007 2008 2009 n n years 1 & 2

Periodic review n n 2006 2007 2008 2009 n n years 1 & 2 years 3 & 4 year 5 whole programme university plus external advisors General Medical Council 2010 2011 year without review! I will be 55 …