Curriculum Evaluation Reverend Dr David Taylor Director of
- Slides: 29
Curriculum Evaluation Reverend Dr David Taylor Director of Quality Enhancement School of Medical Education University of Liverpool
And minister of St. Michael and All Angels, Altcar
Why me? n n I am responsible for quality enhancement of the medical school I am a visitor for the UK General Medical Council
Evaluation of n n n Course components Course/programme Staff
Two Considerations n Process What n How well n n Product Outcomes n Knowledge, skills and attitudes n Fit for purpose n
Process in the UK n Internal n n All components of the course University Annual programme monitoring n Periodic review (every 5 years) n n External – the General Medical Council n Twice in any 10 year period
Internal GMC University
Internal n Process (Quantitative and qualitative) Student evaluation of components n Student evaluation of teaching staff n Staff evaluation of components n n Product n Student performance in assessment n Against definable/defendable standards
Annual n Based on a Self-evaluation document under 9 headings n n n n n Introduction Progress from last years actions Feedback from staff Feedback from students Feedback from most recent graduates Programme information External examiners reports and action on them Areas of good practice Statistical commentary
Periodic Review n Every 5 years the course is reviewed by a senior team n n n n Aims and outcomes Curriculum Assessment Enhancement Learning and teaching Student progression Learning resources
External - GMC n n n n Basic information and committee structures Curricular outcomes, content and structure Delivering the curriculum Student support guidance and feedback Assessing student performance Student health and conduct Reflecting modern society
How to make sure the plan comes together David Taylor Liverpool
In the UK there is little flexibility n The GMC have produced two documents Tomorrow’s Doctors n The New Doctor n n Between them they define what we have to make sure the students know
Our handbook gives a generic syllabus n Subject knowledge & understanding n n As ‘core’, students will be able to synthesize, appraise, explain, and apply the relevant information/evidence about: the structure and mechanisms of the body in health and disease, from molecules up to the whole organism related to: n n normal and abnormal structure and function of the body and its defence mechanisms; the natural history, symptoms, and signs of disease; and the biological rationale for therapy and the processes underlying its complications variability in the role of the determinants of health and disease, the presentation of disease, and the response to therapy clinical diagnosis and management of common conditions The interrelationships of social, psychological, economic, political, environmental, cultural factors on health and disease
Our first step n Was to decide which 200 cases a student would need to be familiar with when they graduated n We finally agreed on about 208
Core Cases
Then n We decided which cases the students would study through PBL
PBL modules
Scenario
Then n The students determine the learning objectives in their PBL groups – they can see every groups’ learning objectives
Learning objectives
Which we examine
Each year We review the cases in the light of the learning objectives the students are obtaining n And the examination results n And change the cases accordingly n Or even the course! n
As part of a long term project n n We compared the supervisors view of the competencies of the graduates from our traditional course and the first cohort of our new curriculum students A series of papers are coming out this summer (winter…)
Each year n We review the content of one of the four subject themes n n n Structure and function Individuals, groups and societies Population perspective Professional and personal development A senior committee of subject specialists does the initial work Then the programme team makes the agreed changes
Periodic review n n 2006 2007 2008 2009 n n years 1 & 2 years 3 & 4 year 5 whole programme university plus external advisors General Medical Council 2010 2011 year without review! I will be 55 …
- David warren director
- Cto brace indications
- David taylor pastor
- Eartha kitt james dean
- David taylor liverpool
- David taylor liverpool
- Dr david taylor liverpool
- The crucible character matching
- Ezekiel cheever the crucible character analysis
- Why did mrs. putnam enlist tituba’s help?
- Reverend parris characterization
- Judge thomas danforth
- Reverend william carey
- Letter to reverend samson occum
- Whats indirect characterization
- Quotes by elizabeth proctor
- The crucible parris
- Reverend thomas bayes
- Things fall apart chapter 22
- Reverend josiah strong
- Fr. vicente balaguer’s statement
- Lecture to a missionary summary
- Ezekiel cheever personality traits
- Vesper song of the reverend samuel marsden analysis
- Crucible unit test
- Why does parris suggest calling in reverend hale
- Reverend sykes quotes
- Curriculum evaluation
- Instrument for curriculum evaluation
- Curriculum evaluation