Critical Thinking Richard M Schwartzstein MD Executive Director

  • Slides: 47
Download presentation
Critical Thinking Richard M. Schwartzstein, MD Executive Director, Carl J. Shapiro Institute for Education

Critical Thinking Richard M. Schwartzstein, MD Executive Director, Carl J. Shapiro Institute for Education and Research Faculty Associate Dean for Medical Education Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School

Critical Thinking • Do you do it?

Critical Thinking • Do you do it?

Critical Thinking • Do you do it? • Do you teach it?

Critical Thinking • Do you do it? • Do you teach it?

Critical Thinking • Do you do it? • Do you teach it? • What

Critical Thinking • Do you do it? • Do you teach it? • What is it?

Critical Thinking • • Do you do it? Do you teach it? What is

Critical Thinking • • Do you do it? Do you teach it? What is the relationship between “critical thinking” and “clinical reasoning? ”

Who is this? (How do you know? )

Who is this? (How do you know? )

Who is this?

Who is this?

Who is this? (How do you know? ) • Political leader of the 20

Who is this? (How do you know? ) • Political leader of the 20 th century. • Mother was American, father was British • Lost election after leading his country to victory in war • Fancied whiskey

Case • A 60 year old man presents with a complaint of shortness of

Case • A 60 year old man presents with a complaint of shortness of breath that has gradually worsened over 2 years. Now can only walk for 50 yards at which time he stops with a sensation of “suffocating” and “urge to breathe. ” His wife notes “wheezing” when this happens.

Case, cont. • PH: asthma since childhood, hypertension for 30 years, mild diabetes, 30

Case, cont. • PH: asthma since childhood, hypertension for 30 years, mild diabetes, 30 pack year smoker • PE: obese. BP 160/90, HR 92, RR 16 Mild increase in AP diameter of chest. Lungs with mild decrease in air movement, I/E=1/1. 5; JVP=10 cm. +S 4. Abdomen benign. No edema. Thoughts? What next?

Case, cont. • Walk the patient: After 50 yards, breathing starts to become labored,

Case, cont. • Walk the patient: After 50 yards, breathing starts to become labored, patient appears diaphoretic, chest exam: wheezes. Diagnosis?

Cardiac Asthma • Increased PCWP interstitial edema, • Dyspnea – Mechanical load – Hypoxemia

Cardiac Asthma • Increased PCWP interstitial edema, • Dyspnea – Mechanical load – Hypoxemia – J-receptors – Vascular receptors – “urge to breathe, ” “suffocating”

Diastolic Dysfunction • 1/3 of cases of CHF are due primarily to diastolic dysfunction

Diastolic Dysfunction • 1/3 of cases of CHF are due primarily to diastolic dysfunction • Failure of LV to accommodate increased volume load • Symptoms often isolated to exercise

QUESTION Is the patient an example to be learned or a problem to be

QUESTION Is the patient an example to be learned or a problem to be solved?

QUESTION Is the patient an example to be learned or a problem to be

QUESTION Is the patient an example to be learned or a problem to be solved? Pattern recognition = experience-based, non analytical reasoning Norman G, Young M, Brooks L. Med Ed 2007

Primacy of Teaching Objectives If “critical thinking” is one of our objectives, we have

Primacy of Teaching Objectives If “critical thinking” is one of our objectives, we have to understand what implications that has for our interactions with students and residents.

Critical Thinking Plan of Attack • Define the elements of critical thinking • Distinguish

Critical Thinking Plan of Attack • Define the elements of critical thinking • Distinguish critical thinking from clinical reasoning • Delineate strategies for developing critical thinking in our learners.

Critical Thinking Plan of Attack • Define the elements of critical thinking • Distinguish

Critical Thinking Plan of Attack • Define the elements of critical thinking • Distinguish critical thinking from clinical reasoning • Delineate strategies for developing critical thinking in our learners. Caveat: this is a work in progress…

Hierarchy of Knowledge Bloom’s. Taxonomy, 1956 • Knowledge - What is the most common

Hierarchy of Knowledge Bloom’s. Taxonomy, 1956 • Knowledge - What is the most common cause of. . . ? • Understand - If you see this, what must you consider…? • Application - In this patient, what is causing…? • Analysis, synthesis, evaluation - critical thinking?

Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR (eds), 2001. A taxonomy for learning,

Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR (eds), 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, Longman.

What is an expert? Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. Med Ed 2007 • Expertise =

What is an expert? Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. Med Ed 2007 • Expertise = Knowledge + Experience • Experts develop “rich and well organized resources…to effectively and efficiently solve routine problems of practice. ” • “Only some experts go beyond routine competencies and display flexible, innovative abilities…in a process of extending their knowledge rather than applying it. ”

Routine vs. Adaptive Expert Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. Med Ed 2007 • Routine Expert

Routine vs. Adaptive Expert Mylopoulos M, Regehr G. Med Ed 2007 • Routine Expert – Novel problem adapt problem to the solution with which they are comfortable – Characterized by speed, accuracy, automaticity • Adaptive Expert – Use a new problem as a point of departure for exploration; expand knowledge and understanding – Characterized by innovation, creativity

Critical Thinking Is the KSA model appropriate? • Are there specific: – Knowledge/facts –

Critical Thinking Is the KSA model appropriate? • Are there specific: – Knowledge/facts – Skills – Attitudes …that must be acquired in order for the learner to become a critical thinker?

Knowledge do the facts • Content learned • How fit together? in a conceptual

Knowledge do the facts • Content learned • How fit together? in a conceptual • What are the framework underlying mechanisms? • What do you do when the patterns break down?

Knowledge • Content learned in a conceptual framework • Judge credibility of sources •

Knowledge • Content learned in a conceptual framework • Judge credibility of sources • From primary sources to “Google it…” • Primary sources – Study design – Appropriate population – Statistics • Secondary sources – Textbooks – Review articles • Evidence-based medicine

Knowledge • Content learned in • Availability biasa conceptual probability framework assigned based on

Knowledge • Content learned in • Availability biasa conceptual probability framework assigned based on ease of recall • Judge credibility of specific of sources examples • Bias and cognitive • Confirmation dispositions to bias - selectively respond accepting or ignoring data

Cognitive Dispositions to Respond Croskerry P, Acad Med, 2003, 78: 775 -780 • •

Cognitive Dispositions to Respond Croskerry P, Acad Med, 2003, 78: 775 -780 • • • Fatigue Team factors Affective state Ambient conditions Past experience Patient factors

Skills • Formulation of hypotheses • How to pose questions – Going from the

Skills • Formulation of hypotheses • How to pose questions – Going from the particular to the general – Are they testable? – Revising with new data • Identifying the key issues

Skills • Formulation of hypotheses • Making logical connections between ideas • Symptoms link

Skills • Formulation of hypotheses • Making logical connections between ideas • Symptoms link with physical findings? Lab data with symptoms and signs? • Finding common mechanisms

Skills • Formulation of hypotheses • Making logical connections between ideas • Utilization of

Skills • Formulation of hypotheses • Making logical connections between ideas • Utilization of data • Sensitivity and specificity of tests • Pre and posttest probabilities • Red flags

Skills • Formulation of hypotheses • Making logical connections between ideas • Utilization of

Skills • Formulation of hypotheses • Making logical connections between ideas • Utilization of data • Identify assumptions • Cultural • Gender • Contextual, e. g. , in our ED, upper lobe infiltrates are all TB

Attitudes • Open mind - willingness to consider alternative explanations • Awareness of one’s

Attitudes • Open mind - willingness to consider alternative explanations • Awareness of one’s own cognitive processes - what type of reasoning was I using? (metacognition) • Reflection - how did we go wrong? Where did we make a mistake?

Critical Thinking vs Clinical Reasoning

Critical Thinking vs Clinical Reasoning

The Clinical Reasoning Paradigm • What do “experts” (routine experts? ) do? – Content

The Clinical Reasoning Paradigm • What do “experts” (routine experts? ) do? – Content knowledge vs thought process – Mental representations of disease processes • Illness scripts (mini-patterns) • Semantic qualifiers (e. g. , acute vs chronic, proximal vs distal) • Encapsulated knowledge (one type of knowledge embedded in other knowledge - basic mechs within clinical examples - example: “sepsis”)

How often do we need critical thinking in the clinical setting? • Bowen J,

How often do we need critical thinking in the clinical setting? • Bowen J, NEJM, 2006: 355; 2217 -2225 – Pattern recognition (non-analytical thinking) is “essential to diagnostic expertise” – “Deliberative analytic reasoning is primary strategy when a case is complex…”

Clinical Reasoning and Critical Thinking

Clinical Reasoning and Critical Thinking

Clinical Reasoning My bias… • The 80/20 rule – 80% of clinical medicine, pattern

Clinical Reasoning My bias… • The 80/20 rule – 80% of clinical medicine, pattern recognition works well. – 20% of clinical medicine, to get it right, you need to apply the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of critical thinking. • The key - knowing into which group your patient fits.

Can we teach critical thinking?

Can we teach critical thinking?

Critical Thinking in College, Council for Learning Assessment (CLA), courtesy of Richard Hersh, Ed.

Critical Thinking in College, Council for Learning Assessment (CLA), courtesy of Richard Hersh, Ed. D, lecture at HMS, Jan. 19, 2007

Some Strategies for Teaching Critical Thinking • Go back to the knowledge, skills, attributes

Some Strategies for Teaching Critical Thinking • Go back to the knowledge, skills, attributes – Be explicit that we are teaching critical thinking – Woven into teaching content – Separate teaching modules – Beware the hidden curriculum!! • A few thoughts from the literature (and my experience).

Concept Maps Guerrero, Acad Med 2001; 76: 385 Torre et al. , Am J

Concept Maps Guerrero, Acad Med 2001; 76: 385 Torre et al. , Am J Med 2006; 119: 903 • Graphic devices to represent relationships between multiple concepts • Reinforce mechanistic thinking • Make links explicit

Higher Order Concepts Auclair F, BMC Medical Education 2007; 7: 16 • 32 third

Higher Order Concepts Auclair F, BMC Medical Education 2007; 7: 16 • 32 third year students given complex CPC case (endocarditis) to analyze – 12/32 made correct dx – Diagnostic accuracy use of higher order concepts. Students who missed dx reported factual observations • 19/25 students: given problem formulation (i. e, concept links) made dx • Problem not knowledge but moving from fact to concept

Case Conference Traditional • 65 year old homeless man back pain • Hep C,

Case Conference Traditional • 65 year old homeless man back pain • Hep C, spinal lymphoma • Later abn CXR MAC • Discuss: tests, meds, each disease in isolation

Case Conference Traditional • 65 year old homeless man back pain • Hep C,

Case Conference Traditional • 65 year old homeless man back pain • Hep C, spinal lymphoma • Later abn CXR MAC • Discuss: tests, meds, each disease in isolation Critical thinking • 65 year old homeless man back pain • Hep C, spinal lymphoma • Unifying mechs? • Abn CXR MAC • Discuss: make links -immune problem HIV

Model the Process • Think out loud • Discourage quick jumps to the dx

Model the Process • Think out loud • Discourage quick jumps to the dx • Force the student to assess her own thought process • Give frequent feedback • Test them on the process as well as the content

Final Thoughts… • There is more to be done to understand the elements of

Final Thoughts… • There is more to be done to understand the elements of critical thinking. • If we are serious about this, we need to explicitly teach the process. • Critical thinking and clinical reasoning (as presently defined) are not the same. • Faculty development will be key.