Course Introduction CEN 5016 Software Engineering Dr David

  • Slides: 10
Download presentation
Course Introduction CEN 5016 Software Engineering Dr. David A. Workman School of EE and

Course Introduction CEN 5016 Software Engineering Dr. David A. Workman School of EE and Computer Science January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman

Course Objectives • To Introduce the fundamental concepts, methods, and standards applied to, and

Course Objectives • To Introduce the fundamental concepts, methods, and standards applied to, and the resulting artifacts produced by large-scale software development projects. • To introduce the student to the discipline and experience of team-oriented software development. • To give the student experience in the practice of formal Object-Oriented analysis and design methods and modeling notations (UML). • To introduce the basic techniques and tools for estimating software development costs, size and effort. • To introduce basic principles, techniques, and tools for software project management. January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman 2

Text Books and References • TEXTS – Software Engineering: A Practioner’s Approach, 5 th

Text Books and References • TEXTS – Software Engineering: A Practioner’s Approach, 5 th Ed. , by Roger Pressman, Mc. Graw-Hill, 2001. – Class notes: http: //www. cs. ucf. edu/~workman/cen 5016/ • REFERENCES 1) UML Distilled, Third Edition, by Martin Fowler, Addision-Wesley, 2004, ISBN = 0 -321 -19368 -7. 2) The Rational Unified Process Made Easy, by Per Kroll and Philippe Kruchten, Addison-Wesley, © 2003, ISBN = 0 -321 -166094 3) Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, by Rumbaugh, Jacobson, and Booch, Addison-Wesley, 1998, 0 -201 -30998 -X 4) The Unified Software Development Process, by Rumbaugh, Jacobson, and Booch, Addison-Wesley, 1999, 0 -201 -57169 -2. 5) Software Project Management: A Unified Framework, by Walker Royce, Addison-Wesley, 1998, ISBN 0 -201 -30958 -0 January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman 3

Grading Policy • Midterm and Final Exam (30%) • Weekly Status Reports (30%) •

Grading Policy • Midterm and Final Exam (30%) • Weekly Status Reports (30%) • Term Project (40%) – Peer Reviews (individual evaluations)(20%) – Instructor Reviews (weekly mtngs)(project presentation)(20%) January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman 4

Text Topic Overview • • • • Introduction (Chap. 1 & 2) Readings for

Text Topic Overview • • • • Introduction (Chap. 1 & 2) Readings for Next Time Chap. 1 & 2 Software Process (Chap. 2) OO Concepts and UML (Chap. 20) Term Project Introduction (Chap. 3) Project Planning (Chap. 3, 5, 6 & 7) Requirements Elicitation & Definition (Chap. 10, 11, 15 & 21) Requirements Elaboration and Specification (Chap. 12, 15 & 21) Software Estimation (Chap. 4 & 7) Design (Chap. 13, 14, 15, 16 & 22) Implementation (Chap. 9 & 28, 29, 30) Testing & Integration (Chap. 9, 17 & 18) Software Quality (Chap. 8) Research Topics (Chap. 24, 30, 32) January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman 5

Featured Topics 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Project Planning and Management Techniques Software

Featured Topics 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Project Planning and Management Techniques Software Size and Effort Estimation Agile Software Development Processes Capability Maturity Model and Extensions GUI Development Web Applications Development January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman 6

Project Overview • Requirements – – – • Structure – – • Non-trivial (more

Project Overview • Requirements – – – • Structure – – • Non-trivial (more than what one person could accomplish) Interesting ( stimulates creativity and learning ) Useful (has application outside academic context ) Manageable (suitable for team development) Reasonable scope (can be completed within the time frame of one semester) Follow a formally defined OO development process Team-oriented (1 team lead, 3 software engineers ) Weekly status reports (capture process data, report progress ) Formal design review Artifacts – – – Requirements Definition Software Specification (in UML) Source Code (in C++, Java, or Ada) Test Plans and Procedures, Data, and Results Working System January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman 7

Project Organization Instructor Plays role of: Project Manager Customer Team Lead Team Team Members

Project Organization Instructor Plays role of: Project Manager Customer Team Lead Team Team Members Members Project Manager = Customer Team Lead Team Members Team Lead: • represents team to project manager and customer • makes work assignments • coordinates work activities among team members • compiles status reports • reports to project manager • oversees assembly and delivery of work products January 9, 2007 Team Lead Team Team Members Members Team Members: • prepares and submits weekly status reports to team lead • performs assigned work activities • keeps team lead well-informed of progress and technical issues (c) Dr. David A. Workman 8

Team Roles & Responsibilities • Team Lead – Point of Contact for project management

Team Roles & Responsibilities • Team Lead – Point of Contact for project management (attends weekly status meeting of team leads) – Schedules and coordinates team meetings – Facilitates team communication – Assigns work packages and responsibilities – Acts as team configuration manager, or delegates that responsibility – Collects and summarizes weekly status reports (submitted at weekly status meeting with PM) – Responsible for monitoring team activities to ensure project schedule is met. – Reviews work products and enforces standards and conventions for those products. – Represents team in formal reviews with project management and/or customer. • Software Engineer – Performs assigned work packages maintaining schedule and quality standards – Prepares weekly status report and submits to Team Lead – Keeps Lead informed of progress, problems, and accessibility January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman 9

Administration & Reporting • • • Resume’ Weekly Status Report Activity Data Spreadsheet January

Administration & Reporting • • • Resume’ Weekly Status Report Activity Data Spreadsheet January 9, 2007 (c) Dr. David A. Workman 10