Counting and Integration The Experience of Malaysia counting

Counting and Integration: The Experience of Malaysia counting and ethnicity Malaysia 1

Outline of Talk l l l Objectives Motivation: Malaysia Truly Asia Measurement and Integration Concluding Remarks counting and ethnicity Malaysia 2

Multi-ethnic, multi-lingual, multi-cultural and multi -religious nation counting and ethnicity Malaysia 3

Ethnic Fractionalization Index (EFI), Selected Countries (Yeoh 2001) Country Republic of India Republic of the Philippines Republic of Indonesia EFI 0. 876 0. 838 0. 754 Canada Malaysia Kingdom of Thailand United States of(2001) America Source: Table 1, Yeoh United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Solomon Islands 0. 714 0. 694 0. 535 0. 395 0. 325 0. 133 counting and ethnicity Malaysia 4

Geographical Location of Malaysia counting and ethnicity Malaysia 5

Economic Development and Measurement of Ethnicity l National unity main objective of economic, social and national development l NEP – an ethnic based economic policy to ¡ Reduce poverty irrespective of race ¡ Reduce identification of race with economic function counting and ethnicity Malaysia 6

In 2006, Malaysia ranked 37 th in GDP; 19 th largest exporter, and 23 rd largest importer in the world counting and ethnicity Malaysia 7

Data on Ethnicity l Very important for monitoring and strengthening public policy l Measurement important element of census as well as official statistics l Also collected by public and private institutions that provide such feedback to government (eg. Banks, educational institutions, etc) counting and ethnicity Malaysia 8

Measurement of Ethnicity in Census 1 in 3 of the 147 countries surveyed which had done a census in year 2000 had not included a question on national and/ or ethnic group (UNSD, 2003) l In contrast, experience for Malaysia can be traced back to 1871 ¡ despite difficulties of “so many races speaking different tongues” (Hare, 1902: 4) ¡ Need to have questionnaires in and enumerators speaking many languages ¡ Priority in release of information l counting and ethnicity Malaysia 9

Measurement: Word used l Started with ‘nationality’ in 1871 l Moved to ‘race’ beginning 1901 ¡ “a wider and more exhaustive expression than ‘nationality’ and gives rise to no such ambiguous question in classifying people” (1901) ¡ “enumerators could not distinguish between nationality and race” (1951) counting and ethnicity Malaysia 10

Measurement: Word used l Moved to ‘Community’ in 1972 ¡ a group “bound by a common language/ dialect, religion and customs Since 1980, ‘ethnic / dialectic/ community group’ l Although terms changed, generally enumerators have been since 1902 instructed to capture race/ dialect group (religion is captured in a separate question) l Since 1980, published data on ethnicity has been presented along with citizenship l counting and ethnicity Malaysia 11

Measurement: How? By self-identification (ethnicity & citizenship) l ‘An individual’s answer to the question on race should be accepted without question, for there would be many persons descended from at least two of the tribes listed who would claim one as their own for their own private reasons and with whom it would be quite improper to discuss or dispute these reasons. ’ (Jones, 1962) l For persons of mixed parentage, the 1970 census sought to identify the ethnic group to which the person felt he or she belonged failing which father’s community was used (Chander, 1977) l counting and ethnicity Malaysia 12

Population of Malaysia, 2000 l Total: 22. 2 million (in order of size): l Malaysian Citizens (94. 4%): Malays, Chinese, Indians, Other Bumiputera, Iban, Kadazan Dusun, Bajau, Other Malaysian Citizens, Bidayuh, Melanau, Murut l Non-Malaysian Citizens (5. 6%): Indonesia, Philippines, Other Foreign Citizens, Bangladesh, Thailand, India, Singapore counting and ethnicity Malaysia 13

Measurement: Number of Categories counting and ethnicity Malaysia 14

Measurement: Number of Categories l Criteria: size in population, importance of a group for public policy l Aim: “classification should be as scientifically accurate as possible, the groups must be reasonably balanced in size, and it should be in sufficient detail to provide a sound basis for future scientific investigations” (Harrison in Noakes 1948) counting and ethnicity Malaysia 15

Measurement: Number of Categories l Role of politics (eg. Sabah) l Difficulties when it comes to defining ‘Malay’ (impact of religion, and constitutional definition) l Changes in society, a natural phenomenon but difficult to capture (eg Sino-Kadazan, Kadazan-Dusun) counting and ethnicity Malaysia 16

Measurement: Number of Categories Table 6: Ethnic Fractionalization Index, Malaysia, 2000 Based on ethnic and Religious Groups measured in Population) Region EFI Percentage of Total Population Sabah 0. 889 11. 2 Sarawak 0. 874 8. 9 Peninsular Malaysia 0. 655 79. 9 All Malaysia 0. 701 100 counting and ethnicity Malaysia 17

Measurement Outside the Census l Areas: education, scholarships and training, employment in public service and business licenses (related to NEP) l Major ethnic groups captured; degree of fineness based on purpose and need l Terms used vary, eg. Nationality l Influenced by census categorisation counting and ethnicity Malaysia 18

Measurement: Summary l l l Census an important leader in measurement of ethnicity Underscored by the careful efforts by the various Superintendents of Census to define a diverse population Language is not the principal criteria as concluded by UNSd (2003) Nevertheless still confusion in understanding of race, dialect group, language group, nationality, ethnicity by man in street and even man in office But individual knows who he or she is counting and ethnicity Malaysia 19

Measurement and Integration l Many Malaysians likely able to trace ancestry from more than one ethnic group l For the young especially, being forced to select one reference group can be an issue l Individual need for self-identity vs need for comparable data (Sawyer 1997) counting and ethnicity Malaysia 20

Measurement and Integration l Issue of who is a Bumiputera? (Kessler 1992) ¡ the Bumiputera could be Malays who are Muslim, Malays who are not Muslim (e. g. , certain aboriginal groups), Muslims who are not Malay (e. g. , the Melanau of Sarawak), or persons who are neither Muslim nor Malay (e. g. , ethnic Thai Buddhists and some indigenous groups in East Malaysia). counting and ethnicity Malaysia 21

Measurement and Integration l Young people of the nation have grown up “bred under the NEP…in a stable [Malaysia]…perceivably more integrated…highly conscious of their ethnicity…more Islamised…more polarised. ” Lee (2003) l Issue of race relations more important in less fragmented P. M. compared to more fragmented E. M. counting and ethnicity Malaysia 22

Measurement and Integration l Education system promotes segregation by ethnicity in Peninsular Malaysia l The measurement by self-identification, the definition of Malay and the difficulty of separating race and religion suggest that there will be great difficulty in measuring certain groups of the population evidenced by comparing 1991 and 2000 census data (Figure 3) counting and ethnicity Malaysia 23

Measurement and Integration Seemingly easy shifts between ‘Malays’, ‘Other Bumiputera’ and ‘Other Malaysians’ l Reflect in part the commonalities in origin from neighbouring but politically different regions, Indonesia, Philippines and Thailand l Movement of such peoples across the region in search of economic prosperity is not new, and continues to occur l counting and ethnicity Malaysia 24

Measurement and Integration Has this now entered the social realm so that we can consider the ‘Bumiputera’ community as an ethnic group? l Yes, by criteria of Yinger, Sawyer, Statistics Canada l Then, there is integration among the diverse cultures and communities that comprise the Bumiputera group l Especially for those who become Muslim and accept Malay customs more integrated l counting and ethnicity Malaysia 25

Measurement and Integration However, policy based on a group which is growing not just from natural increase, will likely fail to address growing intra-ethnic inequalities as observed in the case of income l Intra-ethnic inequalities can arise from the inadequate measurement of ethnic groups within the Bumiputera category to receive special benefits (“second-class Bumiputera”) l counting and ethnicity Malaysia 26

Concluding Remarks l Not easy to collect data on ethnicity l Data collection agencies have been creative in trying to capture the diversity against odds of “different tongues” and remote locations of peoples l How have ethnic data been used for policy design and has it contributed to integration? counting and ethnicity Malaysia 27

Concluding Remarks l Confidentiality of ethnic data l Assessment of achievement of NEP targets vary l Maybe targets cannot be met as the target Bumiputera group is a shifting one l Or is the measurement of Bumiputera group not detailed enough to identify groups that need special attention? counting and ethnicity Malaysia 28

Concluding Rematks l Should we continue to measure ethnicity? l Yes, but to meet specific policies that use our diversity to advantage l The problem is not the data but how they are used to formulate, implement and monitor policies counting and ethnicity Malaysia 29

Thank You counting and ethnicity Malaysia