COST OF CULTIVATION n n COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME FOR
![COST OF CULTIVATION n n COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME FOR STUDYING COST OF CULTIVATION OF PRINCIPAL COST OF CULTIVATION n n COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME FOR STUDYING COST OF CULTIVATION OF PRINCIPAL](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-1.jpg)
![COST OF CULTIVATION METHODOLOGY n n THREE STAGE STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLING THESIL – FIRST COST OF CULTIVATION METHODOLOGY n n THREE STAGE STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLING THESIL – FIRST](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-2.jpg)
![COST OF CULTIVATION n COST A 1 WHICH INCLUDES: VALUE OF HIRED HUMAN LABOUR COST OF CULTIVATION n COST A 1 WHICH INCLUDES: VALUE OF HIRED HUMAN LABOUR](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-3.jpg)
![COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST A 2 = COST A 1 + COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST A 2 = COST A 1 +](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-4.jpg)
![COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST C 1 = COST B 1 + COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST C 1 = COST B 1 +](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-5.jpg)
![COST OF PRODUCTION n COST OF CULTIVATION V/s COST OF PRODUCTION COST OF PRODUCTION n COST OF CULTIVATION V/s COST OF PRODUCTION](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-6.jpg)
![TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n STRUCTURE OF COST OF CULTIVATION HAS CHANGED TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n STRUCTURE OF COST OF CULTIVATION HAS CHANGED](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-7.jpg)
![TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n IN CASE OF SUGARCANE, JUTE AND COTTON: TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n IN CASE OF SUGARCANE, JUTE AND COTTON:](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-8.jpg)
![TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n THE COST OF CULTIVATION (RS/HA) ALSO VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n THE COST OF CULTIVATION (RS/HA) ALSO VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-9.jpg)
![PROFITABILITY WHEAT: STATE BIHAR HARYANA M. P. PUNJAB U. P. n MARGIN (RS/HA) 7085 PROFITABILITY WHEAT: STATE BIHAR HARYANA M. P. PUNJAB U. P. n MARGIN (RS/HA) 7085](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-10.jpg)
![TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n PROFITABILITY HAS VARIED ACROSS CROPS AND STATES TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n PROFITABILITY HAS VARIED ACROSS CROPS AND STATES](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-11.jpg)
- Slides: 11
![COST OF CULTIVATION n n COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME FOR STUDYING COST OF CULTIVATION OF PRINCIPAL COST OF CULTIVATION n n COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME FOR STUDYING COST OF CULTIVATION OF PRINCIPAL](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-1.jpg)
COST OF CULTIVATION n n COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME FOR STUDYING COST OF CULTIVATION OF PRINCIPAL CROPS WAS INITIATED IN 1971. IT COVERS 29 CROPS IN 16 MAJOR STATES.
![COST OF CULTIVATION METHODOLOGY n n THREE STAGE STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLING THESIL FIRST COST OF CULTIVATION METHODOLOGY n n THREE STAGE STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLING THESIL – FIRST](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-2.jpg)
COST OF CULTIVATION METHODOLOGY n n THREE STAGE STRATIFIED RANDOM SAMPLING THESIL – FIRST STAGE VILLAGE – SECOND STAGE HOLDING – THIRD STAGE
![COST OF CULTIVATION n COST A 1 WHICH INCLUDES VALUE OF HIRED HUMAN LABOUR COST OF CULTIVATION n COST A 1 WHICH INCLUDES: VALUE OF HIRED HUMAN LABOUR](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-3.jpg)
COST OF CULTIVATION n COST A 1 WHICH INCLUDES: VALUE OF HIRED HUMAN LABOUR VALUE OF HIRED & OWNED BULLOCK LABOUR VALUE OF OWNED & HIRED MACHINE LABOUR VALUE OF SEED (OWNED & PURCHASED) VALUE OF INSECTICIDES & PESTICIDES VALUE OF FERTILIZERS VALUE OF MANURE (OWNED & PURCHASED) IRRIGATION CHARGES LAND REVENUE & OTHER TAXES INTEREST ON WORKING CAPITAL DEPRECIATION ON IMPLEMENTS & FARM BUILDINGS
![COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST A 2 COST A 1 COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST A 2 = COST A 1 +](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-4.jpg)
COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST A 2 = COST A 1 + RENT PAID FOR LEASED-IN-LAND COST B 1 = COST A 1 + INTEREST ON OWNED CAPITAL ASSETS (EXCLUDING LAND) COST B 2 = COST B 1 + RENTAL VALUE OF OWNED LAND + RENT PAID FOR LEASED-IN LAND
![COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST C 1 COST B 1 COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST C 1 = COST B 1 +](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-5.jpg)
COST OF CULTIVATION n n n COST C 1 = COST B 1 + IMPUTED VALUE OF FAMILY LABOUR COST C 2 = COST B 2 + IMPUTED VALUE OF FAMILY LABOUR COST C 3 = COST C 2 + 10 % OF COST C 2
![COST OF PRODUCTION n COST OF CULTIVATION Vs COST OF PRODUCTION COST OF PRODUCTION n COST OF CULTIVATION V/s COST OF PRODUCTION](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-6.jpg)
COST OF PRODUCTION n COST OF CULTIVATION V/s COST OF PRODUCTION
![TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n STRUCTURE OF COST OF CULTIVATION HAS CHANGED TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n STRUCTURE OF COST OF CULTIVATION HAS CHANGED](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-7.jpg)
TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n STRUCTURE OF COST OF CULTIVATION HAS CHANGED FOR ALL CROPS IN ALL THE STATES OVER TIME IN CASE OF PADDY AND WHEAT: SHARE OF PURCHASED INPUTS PARTICULARLY FERTILIZER AND IRRIGATION HAS INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY SHARE OF LABOUR HAS DECREASED PARTICULARLY IN ADVANCED STATES.
![TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n IN CASE OF SUGARCANE JUTE AND COTTON TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n IN CASE OF SUGARCANE, JUTE AND COTTON:](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-8.jpg)
TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n IN CASE OF SUGARCANE, JUTE AND COTTON: HUMAN LABOUR CONTINUES TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT ITEM OF COST ABOUT 30 % IN S. CANE AND COTTON MORE THAN 50 % IN JUTE
![TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n THE COST OF CULTIVATION RSHA ALSO VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n THE COST OF CULTIVATION (RS/HA) ALSO VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-9.jpg)
TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n THE COST OF CULTIVATION (RS/HA) ALSO VARIES SIGNIFICANTLY ACROSS STATES FOR ALL CROPS. FOR PADDY: A. P – 22797, PUNJAB – 19126, ORISSA – 11646 FOR WHEAT: PUNJAB – 19479, U. P. – 13343, M. P. – 10260 FOR S. CANE: A. P. – 45758, HARYANA – 24824, MAHARASHTRA – 40274, U. P. 26148
![PROFITABILITY WHEAT STATE BIHAR HARYANA M P PUNJAB U P n MARGIN RSHA 7085 PROFITABILITY WHEAT: STATE BIHAR HARYANA M. P. PUNJAB U. P. n MARGIN (RS/HA) 7085](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-10.jpg)
PROFITABILITY WHEAT: STATE BIHAR HARYANA M. P. PUNJAB U. P. n MARGIN (RS/HA) 7085 16410 7320 14420 11670
![TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n PROFITABILITY HAS VARIED ACROSS CROPS AND STATES TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n PROFITABILITY HAS VARIED ACROSS CROPS AND STATES](https://slidetodoc.com/presentation_image/54c1b341bec34f45f4540efee0e17476/image-11.jpg)
TRENDS IN COST OF CULTIVATION n n PROFITABILITY HAS VARIED ACROSS CROPS AND STATES AS VARIATION ALSO EXISTS IN PATTERNS OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE. THE MARGINS HAVE DECLINED FOR MOST CROPS DURING 1990 s
Cost of cultivation scheme
3 domain scheme and 5 kingdom scheme
Scheme stata
Ponzi scheme vs pyramid scheme
Shifting cultivation and taungya system
Snap melon in hindi
Cultivation of viruses
Cultivation theory definition
Colebrook on bengal ryots
Republic act 232
Shifting cultivation ap human geography
Naturraum tropischer regenwald