Corporate Valuation Free cash flow approach Firm ValuationDisney

  • Slides: 38
Download presentation
Corporate Valuation Free cash flow approach

Corporate Valuation Free cash flow approach

Firm Valuation—Disney l Disney has a normal valuation case…. l l l Disney has

Firm Valuation—Disney l Disney has a normal valuation case…. l l l Disney has positive earnings. Disney’s earning has a positive growth rate. Disney’s has sufficient financial information in estimating cost of capital.

Firm Valuation—Disney The Strict View Dividends + Buybacks To Equity The Broader View Net

Firm Valuation—Disney The Strict View Dividends + Buybacks To Equity The Broader View Net Income - Net Cap Exp (1 -Debt Ratio) - Chg WC (1 - Debt Ratio) = Free Cash flow to Equity Cash Flows To Firm EBIT (1 -t) - ( Cap Exp - Depreciation) - Change in Working Capital = Free Cash flow to Firm

The growth rates in cash flows Net Income Operating Income Retention ratio Reinvestment rate

The growth rates in cash flows Net Income Operating Income Retention ratio Reinvestment rate ROE ROC g EPS g EBIT

Dividend growth, retention ratio, and Return on Equity (ROE) g = retention * ROE

Dividend growth, retention ratio, and Return on Equity (ROE) g = retention * ROE Assume that ROE=20%, payout=50%, beginning equity = 100 A. Beg. EQ B. Earnings (A*ROE) D. Ret. Earnings (B-C) 20 C. Dividend (B*50%) 10 10 E. End EQ (A+D) 110 100 110 22 11 11 121 24. 2 12. 1 133. 1 26. 6 13. 3 146. 4

The growth rates in cash flows Expected Growth EBIT = Reinvestment Rate * Return

The growth rates in cash flows Expected Growth EBIT = Reinvestment Rate * Return on Capital = EBIT (1 -t) / Capital Invested

Firm Valuation—Disney 1996 Disney’s basic data l l l l l EBIT:$5, 559 Million

Firm Valuation—Disney 1996 Disney’s basic data l l l l l EBIT:$5, 559 Million Capital spending:$ 1, 746 Million Depreciation:$ 1, 134 Million Non-cash Working capital Change:$ 617 Million Book value of Debt:$7, 763 Million (MV$11, 180) Book value of Equity:$11, 668 Million (MV$50, 880) Levered Beta: 1. 25 Risk free rate: 7. 00% Risk Premium: 5. 50% Tax rate: 36%

Cost of Equity • Cost of Equity :k equity = 7. 00% + 1.

Cost of Equity • Cost of Equity :k equity = 7. 00% + 1. 25*5. 50% = 13. 88% • Market Value of Equity = $50, 880 Million • Equity/(Debt +Equity ) = 82%

Cost of Debt • Cost of Debt for Disney = 7. 50% (From Moody’s

Cost of Debt • Cost of Debt for Disney = 7. 50% (From Moody’s Bond Rating) • After-tax Cost of debt = 7. 50% (1 -36%) = 4. 80% • Market Value of Debt = $ 11, 180 Million • Debt/(Debt +Equity) = 18%

WACC l WACC = 13. 88% * 0. 82 + 4. 80% * 0.

WACC l WACC = 13. 88% * 0. 82 + 4. 80% * 0. 18 = 12. 24%

1996 Free Cash Flow to the Firm FCFF= EBIT (1 - tax rate) –

1996 Free Cash Flow to the Firm FCFF= EBIT (1 - tax rate) – (Capital Expenditures - Depreciation) – Change in Non-cash Working Capital =$5, 559 (1 -36%) – ($1, 746 -$1, 134) –$617 =$2, 329 l

The current growth rate for Disney l l Reinvestment Rate 1996 =(1745 -1134+617) /

The current growth rate for Disney l l Reinvestment Rate 1996 =(1745 -1134+617) / 5559*(1 -36%) =34. 5% ROC 1996= 5559*(1 -36%) / (7663+11668) =18. 69% l Forecasted Reinvestment Rate=50% ROC=20% l Expected Growth EBIT = 50% * 20% = 10% l

The firm Valuation

The firm Valuation

How to determine a reasonable growth rate? l l l The firm is in

How to determine a reasonable growth rate? l l l The firm is in stable growth The firm is in a relatively high growth, will be in stable growth after certain years (2 stage) The firm is in a high growth period, will experience a period of transition period before it is in stable growth (3 -stage)

The high growth rates and high growth period l l l Very high growth

The high growth rates and high growth period l l l Very high growth rate in current time – long growth period High entry barriers – long growth period Large size of firm – short growth period

Relationship between growth rates and other firm characteristics High growth firms Stable growth firms

Relationship between growth rates and other firm characteristics High growth firms Stable growth firms Risk Large Medium Dividend payout Very little or even zero high Net Capital Exp. high low ROC high ROC is close to WACC Leverage Very low high

Disney’s Firm Valuation l l Free Cash flows to Firm Approach Three stages of

Disney’s Firm Valuation l l Free Cash flows to Firm Approach Three stages of growth

High Growth length Revenues Pre-tax Margin Tax Rate ROC Working capital Reinvestment Rate Stable

High Growth length Revenues Pre-tax Margin Tax Rate ROC Working capital Reinvestment Rate Stable growth 5 years 11 th to forever 1996: $18, 739 Revenues grows at the same rate as Operating earnings Grows at a stable growth rate 29. 67% of Revenues EBIT of 1996 $5, 559 Steadily increase to 32% due to scale economy 32% of Revenues 36% 36% 20%, same as 1996 Steadily decrease to 16% 5% of Revenues 50%, $1, 134 for 1996, assume same growth rate as EBIT Expected growth ROC*Reinvestment Rate=10% in EBIT Debt /Capital Transition 18% Beta=1. 25 k equity=13. 88% Risk Parameters Cost of debt = 7. 5%(before tax) (Long Term Bond Rate=7%) Steadily decrease to 31. 25%, 31. 25% Steadily decrease to stable growth 5% 5% Steadily increase to 30% Beta decrease steadily to 1. 00 Cost of debt remains 7. 5% Beta=1. 00; Cost of debt remains 7. 5%

Disney’s FCFF Basic year Expected Growth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Disney’s FCFF Basic year Expected Growth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10% 10% 10% 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% Revenues $18, 739 $20, 613 $22, 674 $24, 942 $27, 436 $30, 179 $32, 895 $35, 527 $38, 014 $40, 295 $42, 310 Operating Margin 29. 67% 30. 13% 30. 60% 31. 07% 31. 53% 32. 00% EBIT $5, 559 $6, 115 $6, 726 $7, 399 $8, 139 $8, 953 $9, 912 $10, 871 $11, 809 $12, 706 $13, 539 EBIT(1 -t) $3, 558 $3, 914 $4, 305 $4, 735 $5, 209 $5, 730 $6, 344 $6, 957 $7, 558 $8, 132 $8, 665 +Dep. $1, 134 $1, 247 $1, 372 $1, 509 $1, 660 $1, 826 $2, 009 $2, 210 $2, 431 $2, 674 $2, 941 -Capital Exp. $1, 754 $3, 101 $3, 411 $3, 752 $4, 128 $4, 540 $4, 847 $5, 103 $5, 313 $5, 464 $5, 548 -△WC $94 $103 $113 $125 $137 $136 $132 $124 $114 $101 =FCFF $1, 779 $1, 966 $2, 163 $2, 379 $2, 617 $2, 879 $3, 370 $3, 932 $4, 552 $5, 228 $5, 957 20% 20% 20% 19. 2% 18. 4% 17. 6% 16. 8% 16% 50% 50% 50% 46. 88% 43. 48% 39. 77% 35. 71% 31. 25% ROC Reinv. Rate

Disney’s Cost of Capital Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Disney’s Cost of Capital Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Cost of Equity 13. 88% 13. 60% 13. 33% 13. 05% 12. 78% 12. 50% Cost of Debt (after tax) 4. 80% 4. 80% Debt Ratio 18. 00% 20. 40% 22. 80% 25. 20% 27. 60% 30. 00% 12. 24% 11. 80% 11. 38% 10. 97% 10. 57% 10. 19% Cost of Capital (WACC)

Terminal Value FCFF 11 = EBIT 11 *(1 -t) – EBIT 11* (1 -t)

Terminal Value FCFF 11 = EBIT 11 *(1 -t) – EBIT 11* (1 -t) *Reinvestment Rate = $ 13, 539 (1. 05) (1 -36%) - $ 13, 539 (1. 05) (136%) (31. 25%) = $ 6, 255 million Terminal Value = $ 6, 255/(10. 19 %- 5%) = $ 120, 521 million

Disney:Net Present Value Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Disney:Net Present Value Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FCFF $1, 966 $2, 163 $2, 379 $2, 617 $2, 879 $3, 370 $3, 932 $4, 552 $5, 228 $5, 957 Terminal Value $120, 521 Present Value $1, 752 $1, 717 $1, 682 $1, 649 $1, 616 $1, 692 $1, 773 $1, 849 $1, 920 $42, 167 Cost of Capital 12. 24% 11. 80% 11. 38% 10. 97% 10. 57% 10. 19% Value of firm = $ 57, 817 million Value of equity = Value of firm –Value of debt = $ 57, 817 -$ 11, 180 = $ 46, 637 million Number of Shares =675. 13 Value per share = 46637/675. 13 = $69. 08

Why we do not consider the cash flows related to the financing? l l

Why we do not consider the cash flows related to the financing? l l l When you use the after-tax cost of capital to be the discount rate, you basically take in the effect of the financing. If you discount the project cash flows (without financing) by the after-tax cost of capital, you will get the exact net present value as you use it to discount the total cash flows (project cash flows plus the financing cash flows). That is, when you use the after-tax cost of capital to discount financing related cash flows, the net present value would be zero.

(t=0) (t=1) (t=2) (t=3) (t=4) Inc. rev. 6, 000, 000 Inc. cost (2, 000,

(t=0) (t=1) (t=2) (t=3) (t=4) Inc. rev. 6, 000, 000 Inc. cost (2, 000, 000) Deprec. 2, 000, 000 OP CF 3, 500, 000 Initial invest. (total cost) (8, 000) NOP CF 3, 000 Project CF (8, 000) Financing 8, 000 Interest (AT) 3, 500, 000 6, 500, 000 (360, 000) Repay. Fin. Rel. CF Total CF (8, 000) 8, 000 (360, 000) (8, 360, 000) 0 3, 140, 000 (1, 860, 000)

Assuming that financing totally comes from debt, and the before-tax cost of capital is

Assuming that financing totally comes from debt, and the before-tax cost of capital is 6%, tax rate 25%, so the after-tax cost of capital 4. 5%. (t=0) (t=1) (t=2) (t=3) (t=4) Project CF (8, 000) 3, 500, 000 6, 500, 000 NPV (at 4. 5%) 7, 072, 024 (t=1) (t=2) (t=3) (t=4) 3, 140, 000 (1, 860, 000) (t=3) (t=4) (t=0) Total CF 0 NPV (at 4. 5%) Fin. Rel. CF NPV (at 4. 5%) 7, 072, 024 (t=0) (t=1) (t=2) 8, 000 (360, 000) (8, 360, 000)

How do managers create value? l l Increase the cash flows generated by existing

How do managers create value? l l Increase the cash flows generated by existing investments Increase the expected growth rate in earnings Increase the length of the high-growth period Reduce the cost of capital that is applied to discount the cash flows.

Increasing the cash flows generated by existing investments l l l Managers can improve

Increasing the cash flows generated by existing investments l l l Managers can improve upon operating margin by improving operating efficiency and increase the returns to assets-in-place. Tax management can also increase returns on existing assets. Multinational firms can shift income across regions. Net operating losses can shield future income. (Profitable firm acquires unprofitable firm) Working capital management

Increasing the expected growth in FCFF or FCFE l l l Higher growth rates

Increasing the expected growth in FCFF or FCFE l l l Higher growth rates increase the value of the firm today. The offsetting cost is that increasing the reinvestment rate can reduce costs today as it reduces FCFF and FCFE. If reinvestment is NPV>0 project, then the benefits to growth outweigh the reduction on current cash flows. Reinvest as long as EVA>0. ROIC>r. WACC

Reducing the cost of financing l l l Changing the financial mix of debt

Reducing the cost of financing l l l Changing the financial mix of debt and equity can increase value. Reduce tax liabilities by offsetting tax liabilities with interest payments. Leads to an optimal capital structure for firm than lowers overall cost of capital and maximized firm value.

Adjusted Present Value (APV) Approach l l APV = PV of asset flows +

Adjusted Present Value (APV) Approach l l APV = PV of asset flows + PV of side effects associated with the financing program. Recall the M/M proposition I:

Adjusted Present Value (APV) Approach l Procedure: l l l 1. Calculate PV of

Adjusted Present Value (APV) Approach l Procedure: l l l 1. Calculate PV of project (or enterprise) assuming it is all equity financed (i. e. no interest expense) 2. Calculate value of tax shield. 3. Total firm value = value of all equity firm + side effects of financing.

Calculate PV of project assuming it is all equity financed l Assume: l l

Calculate PV of project assuming it is all equity financed l Assume: l l l Asset (un-levered) beta = 0. 7 Long Term T Bond Rate = 6% Market Premium = 7. 8% From CAPM, Discount rate =. 06 +. 7*. 078 =. 1146 Also assume: Terminal value = (approx. ) 7 x FCF

Year: 1 2 3 4 5 EBIT 100 108 116 124 134 Tax @

Year: 1 2 3 4 5 EBIT 100 108 116 124 134 Tax @ 40% 40 43. 2 46. 4 49. 6 53. 6 Capex 30 32 35 37 40 Depreciation 20 22 24 26 28 Increase in NWC 20 22 23 25 27 FCF 30 32. 8 35. 6 38. 4 41. 4 Terminal Value PV@11. 46% Total PV 296. 4 289. 8 26. 9 26. 4 25. 7 24. 9 24. 1 168. 5

Calculate value of tax shield Assume: $150 of debt at 8% (pretax) remains outstanding

Calculate value of tax shield Assume: $150 of debt at 8% (pretax) remains outstanding Year: 1 2 3 4 5 EBIT 100 108 116 124 134 Interest(=outstanding debt*. 08) 12. 0 10. 2 8. 0 5. 6 2. 8 Profit before tax 88. 0 97. 8 108. 0 118. 4 131. 2 Tax @ 40% 35. 2 39. 1 43. 2 47. 4 52. 5 Profit after tax 52. 8 58. 7 64. 8 71. 1 78. 7 Capex 30 32 35 37 40 Depreciation 20 22 24 26 28 Increase in NWC 20 22 23 25 27 Net CF 22. 8 26. 7 30. 8 35. 1 39. 7 Ending Debt = (beginning debt –net cash flow) 127. 2 100. 5 69. 7 34. 7 -5. 1

Compare tax payments with vs. without debt. The difference equals the tax savings available

Compare tax payments with vs. without debt. The difference equals the tax savings available from the interest deduction (tax shield) Discount tax savings at pre-tax rate of return on debt: Tax payments with 40. 0 no debt 43. 2 46. 4 49. 6 53. 6 Tax payments with 35. 2 debt @ 8% 39. 1 43. 2 47. 4 52. 5 Tax savings 4. 1 3. 2 2. 2 1. 1 PV of tax savings @ 8% $13 4. 8

Suppose in addition there is a tax loss carry-forward of $100 million. This means

Suppose in addition there is a tax loss carry-forward of $100 million. This means that the first $40 million of taxes need not be paid. Year Tax savings Taxable Income Used 1 35. 2 88 2 4. 8 100 PV of tax savings @ 8% $37 Present value these savings at 8%, produces a value of 37 for the tax loss carry-forward.

APV - Conclusion Total firm value = value of all equity firm (295) +

APV - Conclusion Total firm value = value of all equity firm (295) + side effects of financing (13 + 37) = 345.