Core cost and programme inventory RCRC National Societies

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
Core cost and programme inventory RCRC National Societies

Core cost and programme inventory RCRC National Societies

Income (€) Income - earmarked/ restricted Total 490. 359. 336, 82 Income unearmarked/ unrestricted

Income (€) Income - earmarked/ restricted Total 490. 359. 336, 82 Income unearmarked/ unrestricted 110. 764. 555, 04 Income (% unrestricted) Average 25. 808. 386, 15 5. 829. 713, 42 20% Highest 59. 939, 60 27. 439. 537, 00 68% Lowest 1. 629. 934, 00 20. 682, 00 1%

Income (%) Income - earmarked/ restricted Total 490. 359. 336, 82 Income unearmarked/ unrestricted

Income (%) Income - earmarked/ restricted Total 490. 359. 336, 82 Income unearmarked/ unrestricted 110. 764. 555, 04 Income (% unrestricted) Average 25. 808. 386, 15 5. 829. 713, 42 20% Highest 59. 939, 60 27. 439. 537, 00 68% Lowest 1. 629. 934, 00 20. 682, 00 1% ICRC: unearmaked + regionally earmarked =30%

HQ funding (€) HQ funding covered from NS own from NS earmarked from NS

HQ funding (€) HQ funding covered from NS own from NS earmarked from NS overhead unearmarked income charges to donors income Total 48. 056. 386, 35 8. 603. 113, 74 25. 908. 387, 24 Average 2. 529. 283, 49 477. 950, 76 1. 363. 599, 33 Highest 8. 862. 114, 24 4. 141. 375, 49 7. 297. 177, 40 Lowest - - -

HQ funding (%) HQ funding covered from NS own from NS earmarked from NS

HQ funding (%) HQ funding covered from NS own from NS earmarked from NS overhead unearmarked income charges to donors income Total 48. 056. 386, 35 8. 603. 113, 74 25. 908. 387, 24 Average 2. 529. 283, 49 477. 950, 76 1. 363. 599, 33 Highest 8. 862. 114, 24 4. 141. 375, 49 7. 297. 177, 40 Lowest - - -

Project funding (€) Project cost covered from unearmarked from earmarked donor sources Total Average

Project funding (€) Project cost covered from unearmarked from earmarked donor sources Total Average Highest Lowest 57. 421. 847, 41 3. 377. 755, 73 12. 646. 613, 66 - 438. 623. 636, 18 23. 085. 454, 54 65. 400. 000, 00 -

Project funding (%) Project cost covered from unearmarked from earmarked donor sources Total Average

Project funding (%) Project cost covered from unearmarked from earmarked donor sources Total Average Highest Lowest 57. 421. 847, 41 3. 377. 755, 73 12. 646. 613, 66 - 438. 623. 636, 18 23. 085. 454, 54 65. 400. 000, 00 -

# FTE HQ Staff (#) Total 9, 60 Average 3, 66 Highest 6, 00

# FTE HQ Staff (#) Total 9, 60 Average 3, 66 Highest 6, 00 Lowest 4, 00 HQ Personnel cost 82 4 11 # FTE field/ Personnel cost delegates projects 54. 203. 811, 80 128 1. 57. 015. 978, 61 2. 852. 832, 20 59 3. 000. 840, 98 8. 967. 615, 60 400 10. 989. 725, 00 200. 000, 00 1 64. 165, 20

# FTE HQ Staff (%) Total 9, 60 Average 3, 66 Highest 6, 00

# FTE HQ Staff (%) Total 9, 60 Average 3, 66 Highest 6, 00 Lowest 4, 00 HQ Personnel cost 82 4 11 # FTE field/ Personnel cost delegates projects 54. 203. 811, 80 128 1. 57. 015. 978, 61 2. 852. 832, 20 59 3. 000. 840, 98 8. 967. 615, 60 400 10. 989. 725, 00 200. 000, 00 1 64. 165, 20

Staff bilateral/ multilateral (#) Total Average Highest Lowest FTE funding from Staff deployed from

Staff bilateral/ multilateral (#) Total Average Highest Lowest FTE funding from Staff deployed from projects unearmarked bilaterally multilaterally (amount) sources (amount) 1. 02 41. 301. 675, 51 25. 528. 971, 34 2 579 6 3. 441. 806, 29 1. 963. 767, 03 0 6 27 15. 385. 615, 00 5. 879. 934, 85 4 109 -

Staff bilateral/ multilateral (%) Total Average Highest Lowest FTE funding from Staff deployed from

Staff bilateral/ multilateral (%) Total Average Highest Lowest FTE funding from Staff deployed from projects unearmarked bilaterally multilaterally (amount) sources (amount) 1. 02 41. 301. 675, 51 25. 528. 971, 34 2 579 6 3. 441. 806, 29 1. 963. 767, 03 0 6 27 15. 385. 615, 00 5. 879. 934, 85 4 109 -

Preliminary quick conclusions • 19 (P)NS “worth” € 600 M; 20% unrestricted; • Most

Preliminary quick conclusions • 19 (P)NS “worth” € 600 M; 20% unrestricted; • Most are project/appeal operation oriented; • HQ operations = € 82 M (13. 6%); financed for 60% by unearmarked funding; 30% from overhead recharges • Based on staffing strucuture highly bilateral • Individually we have in general very little flexibility & agility in our financial model; yet HQ operations largely funded from unearmarked resources