COORDINATED ENGAGEMENTS DIMSON KARAKA AND LI ELROY DIMSON
- Slides: 17
COORDINATED ENGAGEMENTS (DIMSON, KARAKAŞ, AND LI) ELROY DIMSON CAMBRIDGE JUDGE BUSINESS SCHOOL American Finance Association Meetings – 6 January 2019 – Atlanta, GA
SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL (E&S) ISSUES IS BECOMING MAINSTREAM 2 Slide 2
MOTIVATION This is the first paper to study the nature and benefits of coordinated, collaborative and international efforts by activist shareholders to influence investee companies on E&S issues. Slide 3
PRI & SIGNATORIES Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) § Founded in 2006 and supported by the UN. § Leading network for investors committed to responsible ownership and long-term, sustainable returns. § By December 2018, PRI has 2, 205 signatories Slide 4 from 67 countries, representing over $80 trillion
PRI & SIGNATORIES $trn Number 70 60 Assets under management (LHS) 1600 Number of signatories (RHS) 1400 1200 50 1000 40 800 30 600 20 400 10 200 0 0 Source: PRI 2006 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 Source: 16 2017 Slide 5
PRI & SIGNATORIES Source: PRI Slide 6
THE PRI’S SIX PRINCIPLES Principle #2: We will be active owners and incorporate ESG issues into our ownership policies and practices. § Practiced by >85% of signatories. § PRI encourages collaborative engagement. § Yet robust evidence of effectiveness is elusive. § We research collaborative engagement. Slide 7
PRI’S COLLABORATIVE PLATFORM Desirable attributes for research: § Engagements logged in a platform by a third party. - No retrospective data revisions. § Supported by multiple investment organizations. - Asset owners, asset managers, service providers - Not a single investor. § Dataset is truly global. § There is a dated record for each engagement. Slide 8
COLLABORATION § Benefits of collaboration - Pooling of resources. - More voting power, “voice” for mid-size firms. - Risk sharing. - Information and cost sharing. § Costs of collaboration - Free-riding and competition. - Coordination is difficult and time-consuming. - Legal concerns/regulatory barriers: “concert party”. § As a third-party coordinator, PRI can help activists to exploit the advantages and overcome Slide 9
RESEARCH PROCEDURE § Quantitative data analysis - 31 PRI-coordinated projects over 2007– 2017. - 4 areas: environmental, social, governance, UNGC. § Global engagements - 1, 671 dialogues with target companies. - Targeting 964 listed firms in 63 countries. § International involvement - 224 investors from 24 countries - Aggregate AUM $24 trillion, average $115 billion. - Asset owners, investment managers, service providers. Slide 10
MAIN FINDINGS 1/5 Which firms are targeted? § Most engaged countries: US, UK, France, Japan. § Most engaged industries: Manufacturing, infrastructure, wholesale and retail trade. § Target firms: Large, low Tobin’s Q, high institutional ownership, low insider ownership, and a high rating for ESG. Slide 11
MAIN FINDINGS 2/5 Which institutions engage and lead? § An average engagement has 26 investors. - Combined AUM $2. 8 trn, and target shareholding $0. 5 bn. - 2 domestic investors, and 24 foreign investors. - 14 asset managers, 11 asset owners, 1 service provider. § Two-tier engagement strategy: lead and supporting activists. - 410 engagements out of 1, 671 have lead investor(s). Slide 12
MAIN FINDINGS 3/5 What influences institutions to take a role? § Decisions to engage and lead are shaped by home bias (cultural similarities), engagement cost and benefits, and free-riding concerns. § Decision to engage: (i) Domestic target, (ii) Fewer past or continuing projects. § To lead: (i) Domestic target, (ii) Higher exposure to and higher stake in target, (iii) Fewer ongoing projects. Slide 13
MAIN FINDINGS 4/5 What determines success? § Having a lead activist, especially a local lead. § Having foreign supporting activists on board. § Having influential activists: - Activists with large AUM, big holdings in the target, and high employee/culture ratings. Slide 14
MAIN FINDINGS 5/5 The impact of successful engagements (with lead) § Higher abnormal returns, ROA, sales growth. § Lower stock return volatility. § Increased lead activist shareholding in target. § Decreased supporting activist shareholding in target. § Unsuccessful engagements (without lead) are not followed by a material change in ROA, sales Slide 15
CONCLUSIONS § Coordinated engagements on E&S are expanding. - This is the first global study of E&S engagements. § Engagement practices associated with success: - Lead investor from same location as target. - Lead should have high AUM, high stake in and high exposure to target, high employee/culture ratings. § Supporting investors widen impact of engagement. - Supporters should be from foreign countries. Slide 16
COORDINATED ENGAGEMENTS (DIMSON, KARAKAŞ, AND LI) Available at ssrn. com/id=3209072 ELROY DIMSON CAMBRIDGE JUDGE BUSINESS SCHOOL
- Coordinated engagements
- Elroy and rose are at
- Aicpa attestation standards
- Les 5 engagements de pôle emploi
- Coordinated product and supply chain design
- A consciously coordinated social unit
- Coordinated management of meaning theory
- Snohomish county coordinated entry
- Ccrt
- Meaning
- Ccc plus waiver manual
- Chicago coordinated entry system
- Define retail management
- Coordinated effort in retailing concept
- Accelegrants
- Early intervening services
- A series of coordinated related multiple projects
- A series of coordinated related multiple projects