Convex Relaxation for Polynomial Optimization Application to Power

  • Slides: 33
Download presentation
Convex Relaxation for Polynomial Optimization: Application to Power Systems and Decentralized Control Javad Lavaei

Convex Relaxation for Polynomial Optimization: Application to Power Systems and Decentralized Control Javad Lavaei Department of Electrical Engineering Columbia University

Outline v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization (Joint work with: Somayeh Sojoudi) v

Outline v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization (Joint work with: Somayeh Sojoudi) v Optimization over power networks (Joint work with: Steven Low, David Tse, Stephen Boyd, Somayeh Sojoudi, Ramtin Madani, Baosen Zhang, Matt Kraning, Eric Chu) v Optimal decentralized control (Joint work with: Ghazal Fazelnia and Ramtin Madani) v General theory for polynomial optimization (Joint work with: Ramtin Madani, Somayeh Sojoudi and Ghazal Fazelnia) Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 2

Penalized Semidefinite Programming (SDP) Relaxation q Exactness of SDP relaxation: v Existence of a

Penalized Semidefinite Programming (SDP) Relaxation q Exactness of SDP relaxation: v Existence of a rank-1 solution v Implies finding a global solution q How to study the exactness of relaxation? Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 3

Highly Structured Optimization v Abstract optimizations are NP-hard in the worst case. v Real-world

Highly Structured Optimization v Abstract optimizations are NP-hard in the worst case. v Real-world optimizations are highly structured: q Sparsity: q Non-trivial structure: v Question: How do structures affect tractability of an optimization? Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 4

Example v Given a polynomial optimization, we first make it quadratic and then map

Example v Given a polynomial optimization, we first make it quadratic and then map its structure into a generalized weighted graph: Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 5

Example Optimization: Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 6

Example Optimization: Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 6

Real-Valued Optimization Edge Cycle Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 7

Real-Valued Optimization Edge Cycle Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 7

Complex-Valued Optimization v Real-valued case: “T “ is sign definite if its elements are

Complex-Valued Optimization v Real-valued case: “T “ is sign definite if its elements are all negative or all positive. v Complex-valued case: “T “ is sign definite if T and –T are separable in R 2: Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 8

Complex-Valued Optimization v Consider a real matrix M: v Polynomial-time solvable for weakly-cyclic bipartite

Complex-Valued Optimization v Consider a real matrix M: v Polynomial-time solvable for weakly-cyclic bipartite graphs. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 9

Outline v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization (Joint work with: Somayeh Sojoudi) v

Outline v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization (Joint work with: Somayeh Sojoudi) v Optimization over power networks (Joint work with: Steven Low, David Tse, Stephen Boyd, Somayeh Sojoudi, Ramtin Madani, Baosen Zhang, Matt Kraning, Eric Chu) v Optimal decentralized control (Joint work with: Ghazal Fazelnia and Ramtin Madani) v General theory for polynomial optimization (Joint work with: Ramtin Madani, Somayeh Sojoudi and Ghazal Fazelnia) Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 10

Power Networks q Optimizations: § Optimal power flow (OPF) § Security-constrained OPF § State

Power Networks q Optimizations: § Optimal power flow (OPF) § Security-constrained OPF § State estimation § Network reconfiguration § Unit commitment § Dynamic energy management q Issue of non-convexity: § Discrete parameters § Nonlinearity in continuous variables q Transition from traditional grid to smart grid: § More variables (10 X) § Time constraints (100 X) Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 11

Resource Allocation: Optimal Power Flow (OPF) Voltage V Current I Complex power = VI*=P

Resource Allocation: Optimal Power Flow (OPF) Voltage V Current I Complex power = VI*=P + Q i OPF: Given constant-power loads, find optimal P’s subject to: § Demand constraints § Constraints on V’s, P’s, and Q’s. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 12

Broad Interest in Optimal Power Flow q OPF-based problems solved on different time scales:

Broad Interest in Optimal Power Flow q OPF-based problems solved on different time scales: § Electricity market § Real-time operation § Security assessment § Transmission planning q Existing methods based on linearization or local search q Question: How to find the best solution using a scalable robust algorithm? q Huge literature since 1962 by power, OR and Econ people Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 13

Optimal Power Flow Cost Operation Flow Balance Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 14

Optimal Power Flow Cost Operation Flow Balance Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 14

Project 1: How to solve a given OPF in polynomial time? (joint work with

Project 1: How to solve a given OPF in polynomial time? (joint work with Steven Low) q A sufficient condition to globally solve OPF: § Numerous randomly generated systems § IEEE systems with 14, 30, 57, 118, 300 buses § European grid q Various theories: It holds widely in practice Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 15

Project 2: Find network topologies over which optimization is easy? (joint work with Somayeh

Project 2: Find network topologies over which optimization is easy? (joint work with Somayeh Sojoudi, David Tse and Baosen Zhang) q Distribution networks are fine due to a sign definite property: q Transmission networks may need phase shifters: PS Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 16

Project 3: How to design a distributed algorithm for solving OPF? (joint work with

Project 3: How to design a distributed algorithm for solving OPF? (joint work with Stephen Boyd, Eric Chu and Matt Kranning) q A practical (infinitely) parallelizable algorithm using ADMM. q It solves 10, 000 -bus OPF in 0. 85 seconds on a single core machine. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 17

Project 4: How to do optimization for mesh networks? (joint work with Ramtin Madani

Project 4: How to do optimization for mesh networks? (joint work with Ramtin Madani and Somayeh Sojoudi) q Observed that equivalent formulations might be different after relaxation. q Upper bounded the rank based on the network topology. q Developed a penalization technique. q Verified its performance on IEEE systems with 7000 cost functions. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 18

Response of SDP to Equivalent Formulations q Capacity constraint: active power, apparent power, angle

Response of SDP to Equivalent Formulations q Capacity constraint: active power, apparent power, angle difference, voltage difference, current? P 1 P 2 1. Equivalent formulations behave differently after relaxation. 2. SDP works for weakly-cyclic networks with cycles of size 3 if voltage difference is used to restrict flows. Correct solution Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 19

Low-Rank Solution Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 20

Low-Rank Solution Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 20

Penalized SDP Relaxation q Use Penalized SDP relaxation to turn a low-rank solution into

Penalized SDP Relaxation q Use Penalized SDP relaxation to turn a low-rank solution into a rank-1 matrix: q IEEE systems with 7000 cost functions q Modified 118 -bus system with 3 local solutions (Bukhsh et al. ) q Near-optimal solution coincided with the IPM’s solution in 100%, 96. 6% and 95. 8% of cases for IEEE 14, 30 and 57 -bus systems. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 21

Outline v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization (Joint work with: Somayeh Sojoudi) v

Outline v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization (Joint work with: Somayeh Sojoudi) v Optimization over power networks (Joint work with: Steven Low, David Tse, Stephen Boyd, Somayeh Sojoudi, Ramtin Madani, Baosen Zhang, Matt Kraning, Eric Chu) v Optimal decentralized control (Joint work with: Ghazal Fazelnia and Ramtin Madani) v General theory for polynomial optimization (Joint work with: Ramtin Madani, Somayeh Sojoudi and Ghazal Fazelnia) Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 22

Distributed Control q Computational challenges arising in the control of real-world systems: v Communication

Distributed Control q Computational challenges arising in the control of real-world systems: v Communication networks v Electrical power systems v Aerospace systems v Large-space flexible structures v Traffic systems v Wireless sensor networks v Various multi-agent systems Decentralized control Distributed control Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 23

Optimal Decentralized Control Problem q Optimal centralized control: Easy (LQR, LQG, etc. ) q

Optimal Decentralized Control Problem q Optimal centralized control: Easy (LQR, LQG, etc. ) q Optimal distributed control (ODC): NP-hard (Witsenhausen’s example) q Consider the time-varying system: q The goal is to design a structured controller Javad Lavaei, Columbia University to minimize 24

Two Quadratic Formulations in Static Case q Formulation in time domain: v Stack the

Two Quadratic Formulations in Static Case q Formulation in time domain: v Stack the free parameters of K in a vector h. v Define v as: q Formulation in Lypunov domain: v Consider the BMI constraint: v Define v as: Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 25

Graph of ODC for Time-Domain Formulation Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 26

Graph of ODC for Time-Domain Formulation Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 26

Recovery of Rank-3 Solution v How to find such a low-rank solution? q Nuclear

Recovery of Rank-3 Solution v How to find such a low-rank solution? q Nuclear norm technique fails. q Add edges in the controller cloud to make it a tree: q Add a new vertex and connect it to all existing nodes. q Perform an optimization over the new graph. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 27

Numerical Example (Decentralized Case) SDP Relaxation Penalized SDP Relaxation q Rank: 1 or 2

Numerical Example (Decentralized Case) SDP Relaxation Penalized SDP Relaxation q Rank: 1 or 2 q Rank: 1 q Exactness in 59 trials q 99. 8% optimality for 84 trials Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 28

Distributed Case v 100 random systems with standard deviation 3 for A and B,

Distributed Case v 100 random systems with standard deviation 3 for A and B, and 2 for X 0. v Each communication link exists with probability 0. 9. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 29

Outline v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization (Joint work with: Somayeh Sojoudi) v

Outline v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization (Joint work with: Somayeh Sojoudi) v Optimization over power networks (Joint work with: Steven Low, David Tse, Stephen Boyd, Somayeh Sojoudi, Ramtin Madani, Baosen Zhang, Matt Kraning, Eric Chu) v Optimal decentralized control (Joint work with: Ghazal Fazelnia and Ramtin Madani) v General theory for polynomial optimization (Joint work with: Ramtin Madani, Somayeh Sojoudi, and Ghazal Fazelnia) Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 29

Polynomial Optimization v Consider an arbitrary polynomial optimization: v Fact 1: v Fact 2:

Polynomial Optimization v Consider an arbitrary polynomial optimization: v Fact 1: v Fact 2: Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 31

Polynomial Optimization q Technique: distributed computation q This gives rise to a sparse QCQP

Polynomial Optimization q Technique: distributed computation q This gives rise to a sparse QCQP with a sparse graph. q Question: Given a sparse LMI, find a low-rank solution in polynomial time? q We have a theory for relating the rank of W to the topology of its graph. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 32

Conclusions v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization: q Complexity of SDP relaxation can

Conclusions v Convex relaxation for highly structured optimization: q Complexity of SDP relaxation can be related to properties of a generalized graph. v Optimization over power networks: q Optimization over power networks becomes mostly easy due to their structures. v Optimal decentralized control: q ODC is a highly sparse nonlinear optimization so its relaxation has a rank 1 -3 solution. v General theory for polynomial optimization: q Every polynomial optimization has an SDP relaxation with a rank 1 -3 solution. Javad Lavaei, Columbia University 33