Conventional Facilities WBS 1 9 Overview Systems Description

Conventional Facilities WBS 1. 9 • Overview & Systems Description • Progress to Date • Construction Schedule • Cost Estimate • CM/GC Plan • Summary of Changes November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Conventional Facilities WBS 1. 9 Spear Future Office Space Undulator Hall Research Yard Pep Ring Road SLC Office Complex Survey Tower NEH Beam Transport Hall Future Beam Lines Beam Dump Front End Enclosure SLC Tunnel X-Ray Transport Pep Tunnel November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Systems Description • Extends SLAC LINAC ~ 1/2 mile (814 meters) • Includes a composition of renovations to existing SLAC infrastructure and new facilities November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Systems Description - continued • Renovated facilities – Sector 20 Injector Facility - 2, 160 sf facility incl Laser Rm, Control Rm to house the injector laser and assoc equipment – Magnetic Measurement Facility - 4, 000 sf facility used to tune, measure and store the undulators magnets – Linac Improvements – modifications required to some utilities to support new bunch compressors November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Systems Description - continued • New facilities – Beam Transport Hall – 227 m long above grade facility to transport the electron beam through the existing RSY – Undulator Hall – 175 m long underground tunnel housing undulators and ancillary equipment – Electron Beam Dump – 40 m long underground facility used to separate the electron and x-ray beams – Front End Enclosure – 30 m long underground facility to house various diagnostic equipment in support of the photon beam November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Systems Description - continued – Near Experimental Hall – underground facility whose primary function is to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shops –X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel – 250 m long underground tunnel used to transport photon beams from NEH to FEH – Far Experimental Hall – underground cavern/tunnels to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shop space – Central Lab Office Complex – office facility to house ~ 260 LCLS researchers, engineers, technicians, administrative staff and visiting experimentalists November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Rendering At grade in RSY Cut & Cover Location of Pep Ring Rd BTH • Title I Baseline complete • 800 m tunneling • above water table • 70 m cut/cover UNDULATOR HALL ELECTRON BEAM DUMP & FEE NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL AND CENTRAL LABS & OFFICE X-RAY TRANSPORT & DIAGNOSTICS TUNNEL FAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Progress to Date Lehman Review CD-1 (4/02) Tunneling memorandum and initial geotechnical report (8/03) Title I start (1/04) Lehman Review CD-2 a (5/03) Title I complete (5/04) As-built program Environmental sampling & waste disposal program November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Progress to Date - continued External Independent Review (7/04) Lehman Review (CD-2 b, 3 a 8/04) Tunnel committee to review schedule, risks, safety, means and methods (8/04) Independent Cost Estimate (10/04) FAC Review (10/04) November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Construction Schedule • Major construction phase FY 06 at 30 months duration • Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical system interfaces • Site-work at NEH is key! November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 • Added duration to procurement phase: DOE approval and CM/GC subcontractor bidding phase David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Cost Estimate W. D. Wightman & Company (ICE) Presented a variance of +$12 M (major structures, tunneling and markup) from base cost of $48 M in WBS Jacobs Engineering Revised base cost to reflect more recent trends in the Bay area (i. e. overhead and commodities) +$5 M from base cost of $48 M in WBS Reconciliation was handled by adjusting base cost to $53 M* and adding the delta ($7 M) into contingency (*excludes cost of MMF and S 20) November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CF Cost Comparison November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CF Total Estimated Cost November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC SOW for CM/GC is well underway (draft) and has highest priority for CF CM/GC services will be solicited as firm-fixed price contract Phase 1 – preconstruction services Phase 2 A – construction services of underground and major excavation effort Phase 2 B – construction services of above ground buildings CM/GC qualifications Technical competence Similar previous experience Successful history using second and third tier subcontractors Outstanding safety record Financial strength CM/GC Award 5/05 November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Phase 1 Services Phase 1 – preconstruction activities to include: Estimates during Title II CPM Schedule Identify lead-time for critical items Design coordination Constructability reviews Value Engineering reviews Site investigation November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Phase 1 Services – cont’d Develop Project Management Plan (PMP) Construction Management Plan – outlines project scope, organization, and specific approach to accomplish project Project Safety Plan – project specific identifying job hazards, safety performance and individuals responsible for project safety Procurement Plan – identifies systems, methods and procedures for solicitation to subcontractors Quality Control and Assurance Plan – method of controlling time, cost and quality of various management tasks specific to the project November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Phase 1 Services – cont’d Develop construction bid packages Develop list and contact potential bidders Develop prequalification criteria Solicit bids Recommend award to SLAC for approval of subcontractor Award contract to subcontractors November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Phase 2 Effort Phase 2 – CM/GC shall provide all materials, labor, and services required to construct the project defined as Phase 2 A and 2 B All general conditions including field personnel, office staff, temporary offices, temporary construction, safety implementation, construction equipment, coordination of all subs, project administration, construction waste management, commissioning November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Summary of Major Recent Changes ($m) SLAC CF has visited multiple DOE sites (SNS, NIF and MF) to review parallel considerations of procurement methodologies and CM scope and management interfaces CF construction schedule has increased from 24 months to 30 months CF contingency has increased from 20. 5% to 46. 3% to reflect risks assoc with tunnel/cavern construction as well as uncertainties in commodity prices Project Office has pulled Procurement Subject Matter Expert to assist in reviewing procurement strategy during bidding phase Increased CF TEC from $62. 7 M to $74. 6 M November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CF Org Chart FY 05 November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CF Org Chart FY 06 -08 November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Level 2 & 3 Milestones Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical system Interfaces! November 12, 2004 CF WBS 1. 9 David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu