ConvectiveScale Numerical Weather Prediction and Data Assimilation Research

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction and Data Assimilation Research At CAPS A few examples of

Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction and Data Assimilation Research At CAPS A few examples of heavy precipitation forecast Ming Xue Director Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms and School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma mxue@ou. edu September, 2010 ARPS Simulated Tornado

Future of NWP – also what’s happening in research and experimental realtime forecast mode

Future of NWP – also what’s happening in research and experimental realtime forecast mode at CAPS n n n Global models running at < 10 km grid spacing, Continental-scale regional models and their ensembles running at ~1 km grid spacing, resolving individual thunderstorms and localized phenomena, and providing probabilistic information for decision making and response. Localized nested ensemble prediction systems running at < 1 km grid spacing, for tornado, turbulence, city-scale forecasts. Typhoon/hurricane track and intensity forecasts are much improved at convection-resolving resolutions Observations from radar, satellite and in-situ platforms are effectively assimilated into NWP models Need Peta-flop+ supercomputers!

Storm-Scale Convection-Allowing Ensemble and Convection-Resolving Deterministic Forecasting n n n CAPS/OU has been carrying

Storm-Scale Convection-Allowing Ensemble and Convection-Resolving Deterministic Forecasting n n n CAPS/OU has been carrying out a project since 2007 to develop, conduct and evaluate realtime high-resolution ensemble and deterministic forecasts for convective-scale hazardous weather. Forecasts were directly fed to the NOAA HWT (Hazardous Weather Testbed) and evaluated in realtime by forecasters and researchers in an organized effort. Goals: To determine the optimal design, configurations, and postprocessing of storm-scale ensemble prediction, and to provide the products for evaluation by forecasters and researchers, and test stormscale data assimilation methods. Spring 2010: 26 -member 4 -km ensemble and one 1 -km forecasts for full CONUS domain. 30 -hourly daily forecasts over 7 weeks. Assimilation of data from 120+ radars. Multi-model (WSR-ARW, WRF-NMM and ARPS), multi-physics, perturbed IC and LBC (from SREF).

June 14, 2010 OKC Flooding

June 14, 2010 OKC Flooding

Probability-matched ensemble mean hourly accumulated precipitation (mm) Max=125 mm Max=141 mm Raw probability of

Probability-matched ensemble mean hourly accumulated precipitation (mm) Max=125 mm Max=141 mm Raw probability of hourly precipitation >0. 5 inch 13 Z Max=151 mm Max=71% 14 h 14 Z Max=71% 15 h 15 Z Max=64% June 14, 2010 OKC Flooding

Observed radar mosaic reflectivity 1 km WRF-ARW forecasts of composite reflectivity 13 h 13

Observed radar mosaic reflectivity 1 km WRF-ARW forecasts of composite reflectivity 13 h 13 Z 14 h 14 Z 15 h 15 Z

12– 18 Z accumulated precipitation: 18 h (June 14, 2010 – OKC Flood Day)

12– 18 Z accumulated precipitation: 18 h (June 14, 2010 – OKC Flood Day) SSEF mean SREF mean SSEF Prob match QPE SREF Prob match NAM HWT images

18– 0 Z accumulated precipitation: 24 h (June 14, 2010 – OKC Flood Day)

18– 0 Z accumulated precipitation: 24 h (June 14, 2010 – OKC Flood Day) SSEF mean SREF mean SSEF Prob match QPE SREF Prob match NAM HWT images

ETS for 3 -hourly Precip. ≥ 0. 5 in 2008 (32 -day) 2009 (26

ETS for 3 -hourly Precip. ≥ 0. 5 in 2008 (32 -day) 2009 (26 -day) With radar no radar 12 km NAM Probability-matched score generally better than any ensemble member 2 km score no-better than the best 4 -km ensemble member – may be due to physics 1 -km score better than any 4 -km member and than the 4 km PM score. Radar data clearly improves precipitation forecasts, up to 12 hours. High-resolution forecasts clearly consistently better than 12 km NAM.

Comparisons of reflectivity GSS (ETS) scores of SSEF, HRRR and NAM for Spring 2010

Comparisons of reflectivity GSS (ETS) scores of SSEF, HRRR and NAM for Spring 2010 CAPS SSEF Ensemble PM Mean CAPS SSEF 1 km Model CAPS SSEF ARW-CN (control w/o radar assimilation ) CAPS SSEF ARW-C 0 (control w/o radar assimilation ) HRRR NAM Corollary Lesson: To provide a “fair” comparison Between CAPS and HRRR, the 01 Z and 13 Z runs for HRRR should be used

Comparison of CAPS 4 km Cn/C 0 2008 Forecasts with Mc. Gill 2 -km

Comparison of CAPS 4 km Cn/C 0 2008 Forecasts with Mc. Gill 2 -km MAPLE Nowcasting System and Canadian 15 -km GEM Model 4 km with radar MAPLE 4 km with radar 4 km no radar Correlation for reflectivity CSI for 0. 2 mm/h Courtesy of Madalina Surcel of Mc. Gill U. (Surcel et al. 2009 Radar Conf. )

HIGH-RESOLUTION NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF TYPHOON MORAKOT (2009) 13

HIGH-RESOLUTION NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF TYPHOON MORAKOT (2009) 13

ARPS 2. 5 km Forecast of Composite Reflectivity for Morokat with GFS IC +

ARPS 2. 5 km Forecast of Composite Reflectivity for Morokat with GFS IC + Radar 3 h ARPS obs 6 h 12 h 24 h

Hourly Accumulated Precipitation 6 h fcst 12 h fcst Radar Precipitation Estimate observation 24

Hourly Accumulated Precipitation 6 h fcst 12 h fcst Radar Precipitation Estimate observation 24 h fcst

Total Accumulated Precipitation 6 h fcst 12 h fcst 24 h fcst 1630 mm

Total Accumulated Precipitation 6 h fcst 12 h fcst 24 h fcst 1630 mm Radar Precipitation Estimate 1530 mm

CAPS Realtime Convection-Allowing-Resolution Hurricane Forecasts n n n In fall 2010, CAPS is producing

CAPS Realtime Convection-Allowing-Resolution Hurricane Forecasts n n n In fall 2010, CAPS is producing experimental single-largedomain 4 -km hurricane forecasts over Atlantic 48 hour forecasts twice daily (00 and 12 TC) Two sets of WRF-ARW forecasts, using GFS and global En. KF analyses and corresponding LBCs. Global En. KF and forecasts produced by Jeff Whitaker of ESRL. Goals: Assessing convection-resolving model in predicting TC genesis, track, intensity and structure. Experiment ongoing and systematic evaluation to be performed.

87 h Prediction of Hurricane Earl at 4 km dx

87 h Prediction of Hurricane Earl at 4 km dx

42 hour forecast valid at 2 pm today Dx =4 km 1800 x 900

42 hour forecast valid at 2 pm today Dx =4 km 1800 x 900 x 50 grid