Control Systems Lect 5 LeadLag Control Basil Hamed

Control Systems Lect. 5 Lead-Lag Control Basil Hamed

Control Systems Basil Hamed 2

Compensators • Early in the course we provided some useful guidelines regarding the relationships between the pole positions of a system and certain aspects of its performance • Using root locus techniques, we have seen how the pole positions of a closed loop can be adjusted by varying a parameter Basil Hamed 3

Closed Loop Designed Using Root Locus Basil Hamed 4

General Effect of Addition of Poles Basil Hamed 5

General Effect of Addition of Zeros Basil Hamed 6

Some Remarks Basil Hamed 7

Lead/Lag Compensation • Lead/Lag compensation is very similar to PD/PI, or PID control. • The lead compensator plays the same role as the PD controller, reshaping the root locus to improve the transient response. • Lag and PI compensation are similar and have the same response: to improve the steady state accuracy of the closedloop system. • Both PID and lead/lag compensation can be used successfully, and can be combined. 8

Lead and Lag Compensator Basil Hamed 9

Root Locus design: Basic procedure Basil Hamed 10

Lead Compensator Using Root Locus A first-order lead compensator can be designed using the root locus. A lead compensator in root locus form is given by where the magnitude of z is less than the magnitude of p. A phase-lead compensator tends to shift the root locus toward the left half plane. This results in an improvement in the system's stability and an increase in the response speed. Basil Hamed 11

Lead Compensator Using Root Locus • When a lead compensator is added to a system, the value of this intersection will be a larger negative number than it was before. • The net number of zeros and poles will be the same (one zero and one pole are added), but the added pole is a larger negative number than the added zero. • Thus, the result of a lead compensator is that the asymptotes' intersection is moved further into the left half plane, and the entire root locus will be shifted to the left. • This can increase the region of stability as well as the response speed. Basil Hamed 12

Phase-Lead Controller Design The phase-lead controller works on the same principle as the PD controller. It uses the argument rule of the root locus method, which indicates the phase shift that needs to be introduced by the phase-lead controller such that the desired dominant poles (having the specified transient response characteristics) belong to the root locus. The general form of this controller is given by By choosing a point for a dominant pole that has the required transient response specifications. First, find the angle contributed by a controller such that the point belongs the root locus, which can be obtained from Basil Hamed 13

Phase-Lead Controller Design Second, find locations of controller’s pole and zero. This can be done in many ways as demonstrated in Figure below Basil Hamed 14

Phase-Lead Controller Design • All these controllers introduce the same phase shift and have the same impact on the transient response. However, the impact on the steady state errors is different since it depends on the ratio f . Since this ratio for a phase lead controller is less than one, we conclude that the corresponding steady state constant is reduced and the steady state error is increased. • Note that if the location of a phase-lead controller zero is chosen, then simple geometry can be used to find the location of the controller’s pole. For example, let be the required zero, then using Figure above the pole is obtained using: An algorithm for the phase-lead controller design can be formulated as follows Basil Hamed 15

Phase-Lead Controller Design Algorithm: 1. Choose a pair of complex conjugate poles in the complex plane that produces the desired transient response (damping ratio and natural frequency). 2. Find the required phase contribution of a phase-lead controller by using the corresponding formula. 3. Choose values for the controller’s pole and zero by placing them arbitrarily such that the controller will not damage the response dominance of a pair of complex conjugate poles. Some authors (e. g. Van de Verte, 1994) suggest placing the controller zero at 4. Find the controller’s pole by using the corresponding formula. 5. Check that the compensated system has a pair of dominant complex conjugate closed-loop poles. Basil Hamed 16

Phase-Lead Controller Design Example 1: Consider the following control system represented by its openloop transfer function It is desired that the closed-loop system have a settling time of and a maximum percent overshoot of less than . we know that the system operating point should be at . A controller’s phase contribution is Basil Hamed 17

Phase-Lead Controller Design Let us locate a zero at -15 , then the compensator’s pole is at . The root loci of the original and compensated systems are given in Figure below, and the corresponding step responses in Figure below. the original (a) compensated (b) systems Basil Hamed 18

Phase-Lead Controller Design It can be seen that the root locus indeed passes through the point For this operating point the static gain is obtained as ; hence the steady state constants of the original and compensated systems are given by ( POSITION ERROR CONSTANT) and the steady state errors are Above Figure reveals that for the compensated system both the maximum percent overshoot and settling time are reduced. However, the steady state unit step error is increased, as previously noted analytically. Basil Hamed 19

Phase-Lead Controller Design With a zero set at -9 , we have Pc=15. 921 The root locus of the compensated system with a new controller is given in Figure below. Basil Hamed 20

Phase-Lead Controller Design It can be seen that this controller also reduces both the overshoot and settling time, while the steady state error is slightly increased. Basil Hamed 21

Phase-Lead Controller Design We can conclude that both controllers produce similar transient characteristics and similar steady state errors, but the second one is preferred since the smaller value for the static gain of the compensated system has to be used. The eigenvalues of the closed-loop system for k=41. 587 are given by which indicates that the response of this system is still dominated by a pair of complex conjugate poles. Basil Hamed 22

Lead Compensation Example Basil Hamed 23

Lead Comp. Example 2 Basil Hamed 24

Lead Comp. Example 2 Basil Hamed 25

Lead Comp. Example 3 Prop. control, step response Basil Hamed 26

Lead Comp. Example 2 Lead compensated design Basil Hamed 27

Lead Comp. Example 2 Basil Hamed 28

Lead Comp. Example 2 Basil Hamed 29

Lead Comp. Example 2 • • We tried hard, but did not achieve the design specs Let’s go back and re-examine our choices Zero position of compensator was chosen via rule of thumb Can we do better? Yes, but two parameter design becomes trickier. What were other choices that we made? We chose desired poles to be of magnitude We could choose them to be further away (faster transient response) By how much? Basil Hamed 30

Lead Comp. Example 2 Root Locus, new lead comp Basil Hamed 31

Lead Comp. Example 2 New lead comp. • Complex conjugate poles still dominate • Closed-loop zero at -4. 47 (which is also an open-loop zero) reduces impact of closed-loop pole at -5. 59 Basil Hamed 32

Lead Comp. Example 2 Note faster settling time than prop. controlled loop, However, the CL zero has increased the overshoot a little Perhaps we should go back and re-design for in order to better control the overshoot Basil Hamed 33

Lead Compensation Example 3 Basil Hamed 34

Lead Compensation Example 3 Basil Hamed 35

Lead Compensation Example 3 Basil Hamed 36

Lead Compensation Example 3 Basil Hamed 37

Lead Compensation Example 3 Basil Hamed 38

Lead Compensator Using Root Locus Example 4 Basil Hamed 39

Lead Compensator Using Root Locus Basil Hamed 40

Lead Compensator Using Root Locus Basil Hamed 41

Lead Compensator Using Root Locus Basil Hamed 42

Lead Compensator Using Root Locus • RL approach to phase lead design was reasonably successful in terms of • • putting dominant poles in desired positions; e. g. , in terms of ζ and ωn We did this by positioning the pole and zero of the lead compensator so as to change the shape of the root locus However, RL approach does not provide independent control over steadystate error constants (details upcoming) That said, since lead compensators reduce the DC gain (they resemble differentiators), they are not normally used to control steady-state error. The goal of our lag compensator design will be to increase the steady-state error constants, without moving the other poles too far Basil Hamed 43

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus A first-order lag compensator can be designed using the root locus. A lag compensator in root locus form is given by where the magnitude of z is greater than the magnitude of p. A phase-lag compensator tends to shift the root locus to the right, which is undesirable. For this reason, the pole and zero of a lag compensator must be placed close together (usually near the origin) so they do not appreciably change the transient response or stability characteristics of the system. Basil Hamed 44

Phase-Lag Controller • • The phase-lag controller belongs to the same class as the PI controller. The phase-lag controller can be regarded as a generalization of the PI controller. It introduces a negative phase into the feedback loop, which justifies its name. It has a zero and pole with the pole being closer to the imaginary axis, that is • The phase-lag controller is used to improve steady state errors. Basil Hamed 45

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus Design Algorithm : 1. Choose a point that has the desired transient specifications on the root locus branch with dominant system poles. Read from the root locus the value for the static gain K at the chosen point, and determine the corresponding steady state errors. 2. Set both the phase-lag controller’s pole and zero near the origin with the ratio obtained such that the desired steady state error requirement is satisfied. 3. In the case of controller, adjust for the static loop gain, i. e. take a new static gain as Basil Hamed 46

Example 5 : Consider the following open-loop transfer function Let the choice of the static gain k=10 produce a pair of dominant poles on the root locus, which guarantees the desired transient specifications. The corresponding position constant and the steady state unit step error are given by Basil Hamed 47

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus Basil Hamed 48

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus The lag controller’s impact on the steady state errors can be obtained from the expressions for the corresponding steady state constants. Namely, we know that Basil Hamed 49

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus If we put this controller in series with the system, the corresponding steady state constants of the compensated system will be given by Now consider a phase-lag controller, that is Basil Hamed 50

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus The steady state errors of the system considered above can be improved by using a phase-lag controller of the form Basil Hamed 51

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus Basil Hamed 52

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus Example 6 Consider the following open-loop transfer function Let the choice of the static gain k=20 produce a pair of dominant poles on the root locus that guarantees the desired transient specifications. The system closed-loop poles for k=20 are given by Basil Hamed 53

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus The absolute value of the real part of the dominant poles (0. 5327) is about six times smaller than the absolute value of the real part of the next pole (2. 9194), which is in practice sufficient to guarantee poles’ dominance. Since we have a type one feedback control system, the steady state error due to a unit step is zero. The velocity constant and the steady state unit ramp error are obtained as It can be shown by using MATLAB that the ramp responses of the original and the compensated systems are very close to each other. The same holds for the root loci. Note that even smaller steady state errors can be obtained if we increase the ratio Basil Hamed 54

Lag Comp. Design via Root Locus Example 7 Basil Hamed 55

Lag Comp. Design via Root Locus Basil Hamed 56

Lag Comp. Design via Root Locus Basil Hamed 57

Lag Comp. Design via Root Locus Basil Hamed 58

Lag Comp. Design via Root Locus • Complex conjugate poles still dominate • Closed-loop zero at -0. 1 (which is also an open-loop zero) reduces impact of closed-loop pole at -0. 104; Basil Hamed 59

Lag Comp. Design via Root Locus Step response Note longer settling time of lag controlled loop, and slight increase in overshoot, due to CL zero Basil Hamed 60

Lag Comp. Design via Root Locus Basil Hamed 61

Lag Comp. Design via Root Locus Step response Basil Hamed 62

Lag Compensator Using Root Locus • It was previously stated that lag controller should only minimally change the transient response because of its negative effect. • If the phase-lag compensator is not supposed to change the transient response noticeably, what is it good for? The answer is that a phase-lag compensator can improve the system's steady-state response. • It works in the following manner. At high frequencies, the lag controller will have unity gain. At low frequencies, the gain will be z 0/p 0 which is greater than 1. • This factor z/p will multiply the position, velocity, or acceleration constant (Kp, Kv, or Ka), and the steady-state error will thus decrease by the factor z 0/p 0. Basil Hamed 63

Lead-Lag Compensator A lead-lag compensator combines the effects of a lead compensator with those of a lag compensator. The result is a system with improved transient response, stability and steadystate error. To implement a lead-lag compensator, first design the lead compensator to achieve the desired transient response and stability, and then add on a lag compensator to improve the steady-state response Basil Hamed 64

Lead-Lag Compensator Procedures 1. Evaluate the performance of the uncompensated system to determine how 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. much improvement in transient response is required. Design the lead compensator to meet the transient response specifications. The design includes the zero location, pole location, and the loop gain. Simulate the system to be sure all requirements have been met. Redesign if the simulation shows that requirements have not been met. Evaluate the steady-state error performance for the lead-compensated system to determine how much more improvement in steady-state error is required. Design the lag compensator to yield the required steady-state error. Simulate the system to be sure all requirements have been met. Redesign if the simulation shows that requirements have not been met. Basil Hamed 65

Design Phase-Lag-Lead Controller 1. Check the transient response and steady state characteristics of the original system. 2. Design a phase-lead controller to meet the transient response requirements. 3. Design a phase-lag controller to satisfy the steady state error requirements. 4. Check that the compensated system has the desired specifications. Basil Hamed 66

Lead-Lag Compensator Example 8: In this example we design a phase-lag-lead controller for a control system, that is such that both the system transient response and steady state errors are improved. We have seen in Example 1 that a phase-lead controller of the form improves the transient response to the desired one. Now we add in series with the phase-lead controller another phase-lag controller, which is in fact a dipole near the origin. For this example we use the following phase-lag controller Basil Hamed 67

Lead-Lag Compensator so that the compensated system becomes The corresponding root locus of the compensated system and its closed-loop step response are represented in Figures below. We can see that the addition of the phase-lag controller does not change the transient response. However, the phase-lag controller reduces the steady state error from to since the position constant is increased to Basil Hamed 68

Lead-Lag Compensator So That Basil Hamed 69

HW 4 P 9. 2, P 9. 4, P 9. 5, P 9. 16, P 9. 18, P 9. 22, P 9. 25 Due NEXT Class Basil Hamed 70