Construction Safety Michael Scharfenstein Project ESH Coordinator May

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
Construction Safety Michael Scharfenstein Project ES&H Coordinator May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein

Construction Safety Michael Scharfenstein Project ES&H Coordinator May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 1 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Subcontracted Work Goals GC managed Injury rate concern 120 days of field work remaining

Subcontracted Work Goals GC managed Injury rate concern 120 days of field work remaining The goal is Zero future incidents CF & Technical Systems Installation Maintaining exemplary safety record Direct subcontractor management Detailed work planning May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 2 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Project-specific ISEMS Implementation LCLS Directorate Integrated Safety Management Plan LCLS Work Authorization Procedure LCLS

Project-specific ISEMS Implementation LCLS Directorate Integrated Safety Management Plan LCLS Work Authorization Procedure LCLS Project ES&H Plan Job Safety Analysis Daily Tailgate Safety Meetings PM/UTR manages each subcontract Leads to success TCCO Project Health and Safety Plan Job Safety Analysis Daily Pre-Task Planning Meeting Pre-Task Checklist Superintendents assigned geographically May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 3 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE Through April 2008 DART Rate Total Project Hours 1. 8 M

PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE Through April 2008 DART Rate Total Project Hours 1. 8 M Hours worked Sub. Contractors 484 K Hours worked DART Rate 3. 7 (9 Incidents) TRC Rate 4. 6 (2 Incidents) LCLS Collaboration 1, 300 K Hours worked DART Rate 0. 3 (2 Incidents) Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort. DOE/SC Goal is a Reportable Case (TRC) rate of < 0. 25 and a Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate < 0. 65 per 100 FTEs. May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 4 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Project Safety (Contractor/Technical Systems/Collaboration) May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 5 scharf@slac. stanford.

Project Safety (Contractor/Technical Systems/Collaboration) May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 5 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

TCCo Incident Distribution May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 6 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

TCCo Incident Distribution May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 6 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

TCCo Stewardship October ’ 06 thru April ’ 07 Ramp Up to Full Production

TCCo Stewardship October ’ 06 thru April ’ 07 Ramp Up to Full Production : Procedural Violations Stand Down of Construction Activities : All Hands Meeting Review of Work Planning Process for field work – JSA process inadequate Check/correction of existing documentation PMT changes Deficiency Notices May ’ 07 thru November ’ 07 Full Production : Injuries Multi-day Stand Down of Construction Activities : Corrective Action Plan Procedural violations transition to injures Paperwork ineffectively utilized by CM/GC and trade contractors PE changes Deficiency Notices & Fines Communication with Corporate TCCo Safety Stewardship Committee Established Full time on-site medic (+30 hr OSHA) UTRs added May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 7 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

TCCo Stewardship cont’d December ’ 07 thru April ’ 08 : Injuries continue Two

TCCo Stewardship cont’d December ’ 07 thru April ’ 08 : Injuries continue Two serious injuries associated with one sub PM removed Work stopped 120 Days (to the end of field work) Focus on effective work planning & execution sought Plan for joint observation developed Attendance at daily morning work planning meetings JSA review with workers throughout the day Identification / monitoring of specific trades or tasks for safe work practices Must communicate with the worker The goal is Zero! May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 8 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

CF & Technical Systems Stewardship Excellent Safety Record 100 K+ hours w/o injury S

CF & Technical Systems Stewardship Excellent Safety Record 100 K+ hours w/o injury S 20, MMF, Injector, BC 1 & 2 Issues addressed immediately Positive Results Project Managers / UTRs / Installation Managers Direct management of subcontractors Communicate ES&H Expectations Guide them to success Enforcement when needed Thorough Work Planning and Control Aggressive ISM management Ownership of safety a condition of employment The goal is to maintain Zero! May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 9 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Conclusion Current TCCo safety performance is not acceptable LCLS providing more prescriptive direction Maintain

Conclusion Current TCCo safety performance is not acceptable LCLS providing more prescriptive direction Maintain CF & Technical System direct managed work performance The goal is Zero! May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 10 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

end of presentation May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 11 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

end of presentation May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 11 scharf@slac. stanford. edu

Previous Reviews Recommendations Analyze safety data to look for indicators of future injuries Data

Previous Reviews Recommendations Analyze safety data to look for indicators of future injuries Data Sources Safe Performance Observation – derivative of the a Du. Pont observation system TCCo DB 02 Safety inspection data base 6 Week Look-Ahead Schedule Analysis of accident reports Forums to Communicate Information Weekly OAC Meeting & Weekly Safety Stewardship Meeting Bi-Weekly Subcontractor Safety Committee Meeting Provide visible Senior Management leadership in the safety program implementation to demonstrate management commitment Scheduled Senior Project Management Team Safety Walks Bi-Weekly Executive Conference Call Increase the frequency of the “All-Hands Meetings” Met with resistance – work in progress May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 12 scharf@slac. stanford. edu