Construction Safety Michael Scharfenstein Project ESH Coordinator May
- Slides: 12
Construction Safety Michael Scharfenstein Project ES&H Coordinator May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 1 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
Subcontracted Work Goals GC managed Injury rate concern 120 days of field work remaining The goal is Zero future incidents CF & Technical Systems Installation Maintaining exemplary safety record Direct subcontractor management Detailed work planning May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 2 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
Project-specific ISEMS Implementation LCLS Directorate Integrated Safety Management Plan LCLS Work Authorization Procedure LCLS Project ES&H Plan Job Safety Analysis Daily Tailgate Safety Meetings PM/UTR manages each subcontract Leads to success TCCO Project Health and Safety Plan Job Safety Analysis Daily Pre-Task Planning Meeting Pre-Task Checklist Superintendents assigned geographically May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 3 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE Through April 2008 DART Rate Total Project Hours 1. 8 M Hours worked Sub. Contractors 484 K Hours worked DART Rate 3. 7 (9 Incidents) TRC Rate 4. 6 (2 Incidents) LCLS Collaboration 1, 300 K Hours worked DART Rate 0. 3 (2 Incidents) Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort. DOE/SC Goal is a Reportable Case (TRC) rate of < 0. 25 and a Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate < 0. 65 per 100 FTEs. May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 4 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
Project Safety (Contractor/Technical Systems/Collaboration) May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 5 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
TCCo Incident Distribution May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 6 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
TCCo Stewardship October ’ 06 thru April ’ 07 Ramp Up to Full Production : Procedural Violations Stand Down of Construction Activities : All Hands Meeting Review of Work Planning Process for field work – JSA process inadequate Check/correction of existing documentation PMT changes Deficiency Notices May ’ 07 thru November ’ 07 Full Production : Injuries Multi-day Stand Down of Construction Activities : Corrective Action Plan Procedural violations transition to injures Paperwork ineffectively utilized by CM/GC and trade contractors PE changes Deficiency Notices & Fines Communication with Corporate TCCo Safety Stewardship Committee Established Full time on-site medic (+30 hr OSHA) UTRs added May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 7 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
TCCo Stewardship cont’d December ’ 07 thru April ’ 08 : Injuries continue Two serious injuries associated with one sub PM removed Work stopped 120 Days (to the end of field work) Focus on effective work planning & execution sought Plan for joint observation developed Attendance at daily morning work planning meetings JSA review with workers throughout the day Identification / monitoring of specific trades or tasks for safe work practices Must communicate with the worker The goal is Zero! May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 8 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
CF & Technical Systems Stewardship Excellent Safety Record 100 K+ hours w/o injury S 20, MMF, Injector, BC 1 & 2 Issues addressed immediately Positive Results Project Managers / UTRs / Installation Managers Direct management of subcontractors Communicate ES&H Expectations Guide them to success Enforcement when needed Thorough Work Planning and Control Aggressive ISM management Ownership of safety a condition of employment The goal is to maintain Zero! May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 9 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
Conclusion Current TCCo safety performance is not acceptable LCLS providing more prescriptive direction Maintain CF & Technical System direct managed work performance The goal is Zero! May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 10 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
end of presentation May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 11 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
Previous Reviews Recommendations Analyze safety data to look for indicators of future injuries Data Sources Safe Performance Observation – derivative of the a Du. Pont observation system TCCo DB 02 Safety inspection data base 6 Week Look-Ahead Schedule Analysis of accident reports Forums to Communicate Information Weekly OAC Meeting & Weekly Safety Stewardship Meeting Bi-Weekly Subcontractor Safety Committee Meeting Provide visible Senior Management leadership in the safety program implementation to demonstrate management commitment Scheduled Senior Project Management Team Safety Walks Bi-Weekly Executive Conference Call Increase the frequency of the “All-Hands Meetings” Met with resistance – work in progress May 14, 2008 BES Review Michael Scharfenstein 12 scharf@slac. stanford. edu
- Esh environmental safety health
- Basic safety construction site safety orientation
- Basic safety construction site safety orientation
- Safety hazard identification on construction projects
- Construction tool safety
- Arc flash training requirements ontario
- Construction tool safety
- Construction safety system
- Limited access zones around masonry wall
- Doe
- Health and safety executive construction
- Duties and responsibilities of boy scout coordinator
- Stroke coordinator boot camp