Construction Driven Engineering through the Language of Packages

Construction Driven Engineering through the Language of Packages Presenters: Stewart White – Kiewit Amr El Sersy - CCC Joel Perez - Exxon. Mobil Jacek Morawski - Wood Rev. Slide #

Speakers STEWART WHITE Kiewit Director, Project Controls & AWP Rev. AMR H. ELSERSY, Ph. D. CCC Group Manager L&I JOEL PEREZ Exxon. Mobil Lead, AWP Center of Excellence JACEK MORAWSKI Wood SVP Digital and Technology Asset Solution Americas Slide #

Agenda • Scene Set: Why do we want Construction Driven Engineering? • AWP in Engineering and the “Language of Packages” • Detailed Implementation of AWP in Engineering • Outcomes and what “Good” looks like • Panel and Q&A Rev. 2021 -02 -27 Slide #

Scene Set: Why do we want Construction Driven Engineering? Rev. Slide #

What happens when Engineering is not driven by the Construction sequence? • Pipe supports embedded in civil works are not detailed on civil drawings resulting in foundations without the embedded supports • Grounding system and U/G Process Piping not sized early when U/G work is being done; introducing a safety concern • Anchor bolt design driven by structural steel design sequence rather than civil construction sequence; civil crews would be installing • Isometric production curve not directly tied to construction sequence • Pipe support details designed in a separate sequence than Isometric production causing choke point in field pipe fabrication/erection Rev. Slide #

AWP in Engineering and the “Language of Packages” Rev. Slide #

How can Advanced Work Packaging (AWP) help? Rev. Slide #

Managing projects at the right level Engineering Increasing level of detail 100 Packages Rev. EWPs Procurement 100 Packages Procurement Deliverables Construction 100 Packages CWPs Developing Drawings Delivering Material Installing Construction Scope 10, 000 isos 100, 000 bolts 1, 000 hours Slide # 8

AWP in Engineering – A Project Controls Perspective Engineering 100 Packages Progress by Engineering drawing/ deliverable ANALYSIS Master Dwg List + EWP Mapping Eng’g Disc. Lead feedback on last dwg F/C completion date in an EWP Progress Measurement ANALYSIS Reported EWP F/C Completion Dates ANALYSIS Latest EWP need / CWP start dates EWPs Verified EWP F/C Completion dates 10, 000 isos Rev. EWP F/C Completion dates SUPPORTS Developing Drawings EWP need / CWP start dates Slide #

Detailed Implementation of AWP in Engineering Rev. Slide #

Common Stakeholder Environment WBS- Scope Definition Detail Engineering Supply Chain Contracting Construction Commissioning Define EWP’s Establish EWBS Assign EWP’s to EWBS Eng doc per EWP’s Eng docs per PO’s Eng Milestone dates Eng Budget Eng Progress Plan Eng Performance Eng Forecast Define Strategy Define Vendors Define PO packages Vendor docs per PO Define QA Plan Assign Equip to PO’s Assign Bulks to PO’s ROS dates Vendor data dates Milestone dates Contract Strategy Contract Quilt Tool Construction contracts Service contracts Contract Type Define Systems Assign eng docs Assign vendor docs Commissioning Systems Handover CWP’s per contract Define CWP’s Eng deliverables per CWP Vendor docs per CWP Equipment per CWP Bulks per CWP Budgets ($, MH) per CWP Schedule for CWP Contract budget CWP Schedule Milestone dates Engineering Procurement Contracting 4 3 Engineering Deliverables Design Criteria Design Standards Installation Standards Plant layout Design Specifications Tagged Equip Numbering Specifications Datasheets Vendor Data Drawings Manuals etc Bulk Materials Commodity Coding Material Take-Offs Specifications 1 Project Execution Plan (priorities) 5 drives: 2 6 Project Budget Project Change Notices Rev. 11 Change Control Project Trends Risk Management Slide #

Work Breakdown Structure & Logic Rev. 2021 -02 -27 Slide # 12

CWP Skyline Legend CWP # 100% IFC % Comp CWP target completion <100% IFC 2 weeks FCST IFC Date CWP start date <100% IFC 1 month <100% IFC >1 month 200 D 01 230 J 01 200 D 02 210 W 01 200 D 05 210 F 01 230 W 01 100% 88% 74% 78% 84% 69% 76% 17 -May-19 24 -May-19 19 -Apr-19 26 -Apr-19 3 -May-19 10 -May-19 31 -May-19 7 -Jun-19 14 -Jun-19 21 -Jun-19 28 -Jun-19 5 -Jul-19 19 -Jul-19 26 -Jul-19 Float X Axis – CWP need date (60 days prior to CWP start date) Rev. 2021 -02 -27 Slide # 13

Outcomes and what “Good” looks like Rev. Slide #

AWP Will Compress your Schedule Without AWP 30% 60% 90% Engineering Construction Commissioning With AWP Area 1 30, 60, 90 Engineering Area 2 30, 60, 90 Area 3 30, 60, 90 Area 4 30, 60, 90 Area 5 30, 60, 90 Area 6 30, 60, 90 Construction Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Area 5 System 1 Rev. 2021 -02 -27 Area 6 Commissioning System 2 System 3 System 4 System 5 System 6 Schedule Compression Slide # 15

AWP Benefits Rev. 2021 -02 -27 Project is De-risked & predictable Increased probability of success Progressive delivery Change management awareness Seamless transition from planning to execution Early asset readiness opportunity (data management) Quantified risk management – Safety & Performance Improved Decision Making & Higher Morale Consistent execution language enables AWP digital strategy Slide # 16

Q&A Rev. Slide #

BACKUP

Questions to pre-populate Sli. do • What’s in it for engineering? • Won’t this make engineering less productive / more costly / more manpower heavy? • How early do I need to set my Path of Construction? • Are owners willing to pay for early construction planning input? Rev. Slide #

Commissioning and Construction Drives E & P Commissioning-driven, Construction-led approach guides Engineering Work Packages (EWPs) and the Procurement Work Process (PWP) in a designed sequence which SUPPORTS THE PATH OF CONSTRUCTION and constructability plan Rev. Slide #

Engineering Practices – Impact on Site • Pipe Support numbering on Isometric drawing (erection code) is different from numbering (fabrication code) on support standard details. • Several cases the “site-support” consists of 2 fabricated parts. Impact • Site crews wasted time in information reconciliation • Partial installation of pipe support due to unavailability of one fabricated part. • Welded parts installed at site instead of at fabrication shop Rev. Slide #

Plan Project (Relationship – Logic and constraints) Forward thinking by looking back Procurement Plan Engineering Plan Contracting Plan PEP_c 1 PEP-P 1 CWP 4 EWP-A 1 Construction Plan CWP 2 PEP-P 2 EWP-B 1 CWP EWP-C 1 PEP_c 2 PEP-P 3 EWP-A 2 CWP 1 CWP 3 PEP-P 4 EWP-A 3 EWP-D 1 CWP PEP_c 3 EWP-C 4 PEP-P 5 CWP EWP-R 1 EWP-H 5 “Plan the work – work the plan” PEP-P 6 PEP_c 4 EWP-A 6 CWP EWP-A 9 Rev. 22 CWP Schedule PEP-P 7 Slide #

Constraint Satisfaction IFCs Engineering • • Design areas Eng. workflows 30, 60, 90% model reviews Vendor data (class 1) MCs (Mechanical Completion) Construction • • • Rev. 2021 -02 -27 Availability of engineering deliverables Material availability (including fabrication) Modularization strategy Work face planning Laydown space Equipment availability RFSUs (Ready for Start Up) Commissioning • • • System scoping Commissioning & start-up sequence Permit to work process Lock out tag out process Resources availability Slide # 23

CWA Demarcation / Identification Area work breakdown approach Design areas CWP CWP CWP CWP Design Area Rev. 2021 -02 -27 27 A 27 B 25 A 26 A 25 F 25 H 25 E 25 D 26 B WBS No. 25 A 25 B 25 C 25 D 11 -E-250 11 -E-553 25 E 11 -E-270 25 F 25 G 11 -E-250 11 -E-553 25 H 11 -E-260 25 G 25 J 48 A Design Area Ref’s 25 C 26 C 25 K Undergrounds Key Plan Diagram CWP - Construction Work Building Blocks Slide # 24