Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air

  • Slides: 8
Download presentation
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008

Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008

CMAQ System Overview & Data Flow Meteorological Data & Met Models - Data (MM-5

CMAQ System Overview & Data Flow Meteorological Data & Met Models - Data (MM-5 / WRF) Emissions Data & Emis Models - Data (Mobile / other models) Met-Chemistry Interface Processor - Data (MCIP) Emissions Processing - Data (SMOKE) Chemical Transport Model Governing Equations Gas Phase Chemistry Transport Cloud Chemistry Aerosols Chemistry CONC Extraction “End User” Files DEP 2

CMAQ Data Types and Attributes • CMAQ Input Data Ø Meteorology: gridded (x, y,

CMAQ Data Types and Attributes • CMAQ Input Data Ø Meteorology: gridded (x, y, z), hourly data for more than 50 parameters Ø Emissions: gridded (x, y, z), hourly data for 30 gas and particle species • CMAQ Output Data Ø Concentration: gridded hourly average § CONC file: All species all layers § Extraction files: “ground level” O 3, NO 2, NH 3, OH, other gases, and fine and course particle species Ø Deposition: gridded, hourly total wet and dry § Oxidized and reduced nitrogen species, sulfur, ozone, and other species 3

CMAQ Data for 2002 • Supplier Ø EPA OAQPS and ORD § Data developed

CMAQ Data for 2002 • Supplier Ø EPA OAQPS and ORD § Data developed as part of 2002 Multi-Pollutant Air Quality Modeling Platform • Usage Ø CMAQ Evaluation & Improvement Ø EPA Policy Analyses and Regulatory Applications • Connections to Other Systems Ø Data currently stored inside EPA “firewall” at NCC Ø Data are “loosely” coupled to: § § Visualization (PAVE/VERDI) Model evaluation (AMET) Decision support (BENMap) Other analyses (e. g. , Data Fusion, Accountability) 4

Spatial Coverage of 2002 CMAQ Data Continental US Domain: 36 x 36 km x

Spatial Coverage of 2002 CMAQ Data Continental US Domain: 36 x 36 km x 14 layers Eastern & Western Domains: 12 x 12 km x 14 layers 12 km Western Domain x, y: -2412000, -972000 Col x Row: 213 x 192 36 km Domain Lower Left Corner: -2736000, -2088000 Col x Row: 148 x 112 Lambert Projection: 1 st std parallel: 33 2 nd std parallel: 45 central meridian: -97 latitude of projection's origin: 40 12 km Eastern Domain x, y: -1008000, -1620000 Col x Row: 279 x 240 5

CMAQ Data Enhancements • Implementing improved internal data base management procedures • Possible development

CMAQ Data Enhancements • Implementing improved internal data base management procedures • Possible development of a CMAQ Applications Management Framework with attributes and functionality similar to the Emissions Modeling Framework • Exploring public access to 2002 data via Community Modeling & Analysis System (CMAS) 6

Issues w/re Access to CMAQ Data (1) • What are the specific user needs

Issues w/re Access to CMAQ Data (1) • What are the specific user needs (internal/external)? Ø How will these be defined? • What is the most IT-efficient way to provide access to users inside/outside EPA? Ø Data volume issues § Outputs from 12 km Eastern Domain annual run ~ 3, 000 GB Ø Firewall issues (external users) • Should EPA provide data for all species in all layers? Ø If so, what procedures will be available to users to subset data in space and time (leverage existing procedures, e. g. , RSIG)? • How will user questions/access problems be addressed? Ø Questions: Technical issues beyond what metadata can address Ø Access: IT issues 7

Issues w/re Access to CMAQ Data (2) • CMAQ applications are often “evolutionary” Ø

Issues w/re Access to CMAQ Data (2) • CMAQ applications are often “evolutionary” Ø Specific scenarios may be updated as new inputs and science become available Ø Potential for consistency/comparability issues across different CMAQ applications Ø So. . § Increased emphasis on metadata, version tracking, and other documentation § How will the user community be notified of updates to CMAQ data? • CMAQ outputs from regulatory / research applications must be kept internal until rules / journal articles are published…. . this results in potentially large time-lag between completion of model application and public release of data 8