COMMUNITY BASED MONITORING SYSTEM PROJECT PRESENTATION PROJECT TITLE

COMMUNITY BASED MONITORING SYSTEM. PROJECT PRESENTATION PROJECT TITLE: CBMS – EDUCATION SYSTEM IN ZAMBIA– the Case of Kalinga Ward in LUSAKA DISTRICT – MUNALI CONSTITUENCY. STUDENT DETAILS: KELVIN CHASAUKA SIN: 1609240405 PROGRAMME : BACHELOR IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION.

PROJECT DETAILS §Study type: CBMS SCHOOLS Survey §Initiators: ICU and ZRDC §Year: 2019 GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS §Location : Lusaka §District : Lusaka §Constituency: Munali §Ward : Kalinga

LOCATION OF LUSAKA DISTRICT 

INTRODUCTION To collect samples we randomly sampled grade 7 -9 at each school. This group was chosen because there were able to read and write. There three school in the ward and pupils was sampled not in all school to participate in the answering of the questionnaires. The competition to participate in the evaluation was very high so we sampled ten from each school and then selected one to participate. This made my samples to be very good and not biased.

INRODUCTION cont… For teachers we got from each school who were also chosen from those teaching grade 7 -9 for consistence in data collection. So we got 13 teachers from kalinga school, 10 teachers from Thelma basic school, 8 teachers from sylvias community school.

INTRODUCTION CONT. . Before distribution of questionnaires permission will be gotten from Head Teachers of each school. Teachers and pupils will also be informed the purpose of the research to avoid suspicion and information hiding. Pupils and Teachers were given five days to respond to the questionnaires due to the urgency of the research.

GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS Enumeration Area Frequency (f) Percent (%) Kalinga Secondary 25 50 Thelma B. School 15 30 Sylvias C. School 10 20 Total 50 100

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTIC OF THE SAMPLE Total population in schools 45 Males in school 28 Females in school 22 Percent of males 56% Percent of females 44% Samples size of school 4 Average school population size 4

Distribution c 3 shows the education level of the parents C 3 Frequency Percent (%) Cumulative 3 5 55 55 4 4 44 99 5 1 1 100 Total 10 100

Distribution C 1 shows the age of parents C 1 Frequency Percent (%) Cum/p (%) 42 1 11. 11 43 1 11. 11 22. 22 45 2 22. 22 44. 44 46 1 11. 11 55. 55 52 2 22. 22 77. 77 56 1 11. 11 88. 88 59 1 11. 11 99. 99 64 1 11. 11 100 10 100

Distribution of b 4 shows grades of pupils grade of pupils B 4 Frequency Percent Cumulative 3 4 44. 44 4 6 55. 56 100. 00 10 100. 00

Distribution of b 2 sex of the respondent (pupils) B 2 frequency Percent Cumulative 1 4 44 44 2 6 56 100 10 100

B 3 distribution- pupils birth state B 3 Frequency Percent cumulative 3 2 22 22 4 8 78 100 10 100

B 5 Status of the pupils B 5 Frequency Percent Cumulative 1 1 10 10 2 1 10 20 3 8 80 100 total 10 100

DISTRIBUTIO OF C 4 HEAD OF HOUSE HOLD MAIN PROFESSION C 4 FREQUENCY PERCENT (%) FARMER 1 11 BUSINESS 3 33 CIVIL SERVENT 6 60 PRIVATE SECTOR 1 5 TOTAL 10 100

DISTRIBUTION OF D 1 – ACCESSIBILITY OF EDUCATION D 1 FREQUENCY PERCENT (%) 1 7 70 2 3 30 3 0 00 4 0 00 TOTA L 10 100

PUPIL DISTANCE TO SCHOOL D 3 Frequency Percent (%) 1 0 00 2 0 00 3 3 30 4 7 70 Total 10 100

Distribution of D 4 and D 5 pupil mode of transport and how often attend classes D 4 Frequency Percent (%) 1 1 10 2 0 00 3 8 80 4 1 10 Total 10 100 D 5 frequency Percent (%) 1 8 80 2 2 20 3 4 Total 100

Free Education policy evaluation E 6 frequency Percent (%) Very effective 7 70 Effective 2 20 Fair 1 10 10 100 Not effective Total

Distribution of F 3 and F 6 F 3 Frequency Percent (%) F 6 Frequency Percent (%) 1 3 30 2 4 40 2 5 50 3 3 30 3 2 20 10 100 4 Total 4 10 100 Total

Distribution G 4 and G 5 G 4 Frequency Percent (%) 1 G 5 frequency Percent (%) 1 4 40 6 60 10 100 2 4 40 2 3 4 40 3 4 2 20 4 100 Total 10

Analysation of G 1, G 2 and G 3 § 50% G 1 has been a concern of Government under Ministry of Education to support and improve quality of education in schools by buying books and equipments for learners. § 25% G 3 schools have computers to implement education new curriculum.

Names of Pupils (B 1) Names (pupils) Frequency Percent (%) Cumulative (%) Gideon Mulenga 1 10 10 Bwalya Nkhoma 1 10 20 White Matiziya 1 10 30 Hildah Chanda 1 10 40 Chisenga Kapya 1 10 50 Farles Phiri 1 10 60 Ketty Katongo 1 10 70 Jones Mwanambaba 1 10 80 Cecilia Mulenga 1 10 90 Annie Mwale 1 10 100

Conclusion Observations and Analysis 65% of the respondents indicated need to improve teacher pupil ratio, means that there is need to recruit more teachers. 25% teachers be effective in attending to their classes, 15% parents to encourage their children to go to school and importance of education and 10% pupil doing home works.