Communication Models and Advertising Research AIDA Model Awareness

  • Slides: 16
Download presentation
Communication Models and Advertising Research

Communication Models and Advertising Research

AIDA Model Awareness Interest Desire Action

AIDA Model Awareness Interest Desire Action

Hierarchy of Effects Unaware Aware Comprehension & Image Attitude Action

Hierarchy of Effects Unaware Aware Comprehension & Image Attitude Action

New Adopter Hierarchy Awareness Interest Evaluation Trial Adoption

New Adopter Hierarchy Awareness Interest Evaluation Trial Adoption

Lavidge and Steiner model Awareness Knowledge Liking Preference Conviction Action

Lavidge and Steiner model Awareness Knowledge Liking Preference Conviction Action

Research stream 1 • Exposure, Salience, Familiarity – Zazonc • Exposure – Preference is

Research stream 1 • Exposure, Salience, Familiarity – Zazonc • Exposure – Preference is created by mere exposure • Salience – ‘TOMA’ for mature brands. Reminder advertising for others • Familiarity – Comfort, Security, Ownership, Intimacy – Perceptual Fluency • Implications – High level of ad repetition – for low involvement products

Research stream 2 • Low Involvement Learning- Krugman, Ray For normal products Cognitive Attitudinal

Research stream 2 • Low Involvement Learning- Krugman, Ray For normal products Cognitive Attitudinal Behavioural For L. I. products Cognitive Behavioural Attitudinal Implications – For L. I. products, greater awareness and branding is required to build preference (Wayne D. Hoyer)

Familiarity – Attitude Grid High Popular FMCG Big brands Attitude Imported goods, Endorsement products

Familiarity – Attitude Grid High Popular FMCG Big brands Attitude Imported goods, Endorsement products Recently launched products Paints, Lubricants, etc Low High Low Familiarity

Central vs Peripheral routes to processing Central processing • Depth of information processing •

Central vs Peripheral routes to processing Central processing • Depth of information processing • Rational and logical thinking • High involvement Peripheral processing • Holistic thinking • Associating –ve or +ve cues from ads • Cognitive ‘short-cuts’

Research stream 3 Elaboration Likelihood Model – Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo

Research stream 3 Elaboration Likelihood Model – Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo Consumers are more likely to process centrally when motivation and ability to process is high. When either or both is low, peripheral processing is likely to take place.

Elaboration Likelihood Model to Attitude change Advertisement Motivation to No Process Peripheral cue information

Elaboration Likelihood Model to Attitude change Advertisement Motivation to No Process Peripheral cue information present Yes Ability to process information No Yes Central route Peripheral route

Factors that shape motivation and ability • • Ad medium Involvement or motivation (ad

Factors that shape motivation and ability • • Ad medium Involvement or motivation (ad story) Knowledge level Comprehension Distraction Emotion Need for cognition

Research stream 4 • The Cognitive Response Model Advertising exposure and processing leads to

Research stream 4 • The Cognitive Response Model Advertising exposure and processing leads to consumers forming SAs and CAs. These are thoughts that go on in the consumer’s mind which are cognitive responses • SAs change beliefs and attitudes • CAs strengthens existing beliefs and attitudes

Cognitive Response Model CAs SAs Exposure

Cognitive Response Model CAs SAs Exposure

Implications of the CR model The objective of the advertiser would be to stimulates

Implications of the CR model The objective of the advertiser would be to stimulates SAs and minimise CAs Therefore this is to be managed • Repetitions. CAs rise and SAs fall with too much repetition. Therefore there is an optimal level beyond which advertising should not take place (ad wearout) • Don’t expect to win over a hostile audience easily • Strength of argument promotes SAs • Emotion – Positive moods generates SAs

Research Stream 5 Recall and Persuasion – David W. Stewart and John G. Lynch

Research Stream 5 Recall and Persuasion – David W. Stewart and John G. Lynch • Recall is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for persuasion • For L. I. products, recall is necessary for comprehension and comprehension is necessary for persuasion • For H. I. products, message content indicating superiority over competitive products and recall are both necessary