Cohesion and Norm Enforcement Cohesion Norm Enforcement EG
- Slides: 33
Cohesion and Norm Enforcement
Cohesion = Norm Enforcement EG Social Capital EG Collective Efficacy
Cohesion ≠ Norm Enforcement Empirical Findings Theory
Cohesion = Norm Enforcement OR Cohesion ≠ Norm Enforcement
How is cohesion related to social norms? ? ? Cohesion Social Norms
Theory • Benefits of Norms – Direct • Valued in and of themselves – Indirect • Enhance ability to exchange • Cohesion • Enhance interest in exchange
Indirect Benefits x Cohesion Norms Metanorms
Hypotheses H 1: Indirect benefits x Cohesion Norms H 2: Indirect benefits x Cohesion Metanorms H 3: Metanorms Norms
Experiment Design Indirect Benefit Cohesion No Indirect Benefit
Procedures
Overview - Receive Income
Receive Income ________________________ Your personal income is 30. 30 Personal Income 0 Total Savings ________________________
Overview - Receive Income - Deviance
Deviance ____________________________ V has stolen 10 points from W. 30 Personal Income 0 Total Savings _____________________________
Overview - Receive Income - Deviance - Sanctioning decision
Sanctioning Decision ____________________________ Please wait for W to decide what to do. 30 Personal Income 0 Total Savings ____________________________
Sanctioning Decision ____________________________ W decided to punish V. As a result of W’s choice, 3 points are given to you, W, Y, and Z. 33 Personal Income 0 Total Savings ____________________________
Overview - Receive Income Deviance Sanctioning decision Rewarding decision
Rewarding Decisions ____________________________ 1 point from giver = 3 points for receiver 33 You may decide what to do with Personal your income points. Income Keep __ points in your personal income 0 Give __ points to W. Total Give __ points to Y. Savings Giver __ points to Z. ____________________________
Rewarding Decisions ___________________________ 1 point from giver = 3 points for receiver ? ? You kept __ points. Personal Income You gave: You received: __ to W __ from W 0 __ to Y __ from Y Total __ to Z __ from Z Savings ___________________________
Overview - Receive Income Deviance Sanctioning decision Reward decisions End of trial
End of Trial and Beginning of New Trial ________________________ Points from your personal income have been moved into your savings. Your new personal income is 30 points. 30 Personal Income ? ? Total Savings ________________________
Independent Variables Benefits of Sanctioning Indirect Benefits of sanctioning placed in Personal Income and can be used in exchange. No Indirect Benefits of sanctioning placed in Total Savings and cannot be used in exchange.
Sanctioning Decision _______________________ W decided to punish V. As a result of W’s choice, 3 points are given to you, W, Y, and Z. __ Personal Income __ Total Savings _______________________
Cohesion Points received from others worth 3 times one’s own points. (1: 3) No Cohesion Points received from others worth the same as one’s own points. (1: 1)
Rewarding Decisions ____________________________ 1 point from giver = 3 points for receiver 1 point from giver = 1 point for receiver 33 You may decide what to do with Personal your income points. Income Keep __ points in your personal income 0 Give __ points to W. Total Give __ points to Y. Savings Giver __ points to Z. ____________________________
Dependent Variables Norms Punishment rate for the group. Metanorms Difference between rewards given to victims who punished and to victims who did not punish.
Results
Table 1. Mean Norms and Metanorms Indirect Benefit No Indirect Benefit Cohesion Norms. 898 (. 136). 597 (. 293) Metanorms 5. 47* (1. 96) 2. 58* (2. 81) No Cohesion Norms. 690 (. 182). 745 (. 149) Metanorms 2. 82 (1. 43) 3. 19 (1. 58) N=14 except for starred items where N=13.
Table 2. Regression Results Model 1 a Norms Model 2 b Metanorms Model 3 b Norms Intercept . 745**** (. 0535) 3. 19**** (. 535) . 631**** (. 0640) Cohesion -. 148+ (. 0756) -. 609 (. 771) -. 157* (. 0709) Indirect Benefit -. 0543 (. 0756) -. 370 (. 756) -. 0412 (. 0693) Cohesion * Indirect Benefit . 356*** (. 107) 3. 27*** (1. 09) . 263* (. 108) Metanorms ----- . 0356** (. 0129) R-square . 24 . 26 . 37 a N=56; b N=54 **** p<. 0001; *** p<. 005; ** p<. 01; * p<. 05; + p<. 1
Indirect Benefits x Cohesion Norms Metanorms
Relative size and direction of direct and indirect benefits EG American South Norm content and indirect benefits? EG Reciprocity Social institutions and indirect benefits? EG Formal Rules
If we can identify direct and indirect benefits, and the structure of social relations Then we can more accurately predict norms.
- Lemhwa report to congress
- Njdep ust regulations
- Military and law enforcement
- Military and law enforcement
- Njdep compliance and enforcement
- Law enforcement and emergency services video association
- Norm referenced evaluation
- Criterion and norm referenced assessment
- Internal and external deviation examples
- California api scores
- Texas commission on law enforcement
- Second line enforcement adalah
- Law enforcement night vision
- Mto enforcement officer
- Leads 2000
- Linx ncr
- Florida association of code enforcement
- Fines enforcement number
- Columbus code enforcement
- Atlanta code enforcement
- Valeap
- Nllea
- Law enforcement information exchange
- Planning enforcement
- Markscan enforcement
- E.l.v.i.s. inspection form
- Hpd enforcement desk bed bugs
- Nfhs penalty enforcement
- Post scrimmage kick enforcement
- Law enforcement agencies
- Law enforcement first responder
- Law enforcement agency
- Calphoto dmv law enforcement
- City of wenatchee code enforcement