CMGC Overview SLAC Site Plan Systems Description Construction

  • Slides: 15
Download presentation
CMGC Overview • SLAC Site Plan • Systems Description • Construction Schedule • Cost

CMGC Overview • SLAC Site Plan • Systems Description • Construction Schedule • Cost Estimate • ES&H • CMGC SOW • Summary May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

SLAC Main Gate SLAC Site Plan Pep Ring Road Bldg #081 - MMF Sector

SLAC Main Gate SLAC Site Plan Pep Ring Road Bldg #081 - MMF Sector 25 Sector 20 Upstream LCLS General Work Boundary Research Yard May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Legend LCLS Site Plan Baseline Future Spear Future Office Space Undulator Hall Research Yard

Legend LCLS Site Plan Baseline Future Spear Future Office Space Undulator Hall Research Yard Pep Ring Road SLC Office Complex Survey Tower NEH Beam Transport Hall Future Beam Lines Beam Dump Front End Enclosure SLC Tunnel X-Ray Transport Pep Tunnel May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Systems Description • Includes a composition of renovations to existing SLAC infrastructure

LCLS CF Systems Description • Includes a composition of renovations to existing SLAC infrastructure and new facilities for CMGC –Research Yard Modifications –Beam Transport Hall –Undulator Hall –Electron Beam Dump –Front End Enclosure –Near Experimental Hall –X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel –Far Experimental Hall –Central Lab Office Complex May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

New Facilities Beam Transport Hall – 227 m long above grade facility to transport

New Facilities Beam Transport Hall – 227 m long above grade facility to transport the electron beam through the existing RSY Electron Beam Dump – 40 m long underground facility used to separate the electron and x-ray beams Undulator Hall – 175 m long underground tunnel housing undulators and ancillary equipment Central Lab Office Complex – office facility to house ~ 300 LCLS researchers, engineers, technicians, administrative staff and visiting experimentalists Far Experimental Hall – underground cavern/tunnels to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shop space Front End Enclosure – 30 m long underground facility to house various diagnostic equipment in support of the photon beam Near Experimental Hall – underground facility whose primary function is to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shops X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel – 250 m long underground tunnel used to transport photon beams from NEH to FEH May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Below Grade Plan Beam Dump FEE Near Hall/CLOC Beam Transport Hall (at grade) Undulator

Below Grade Plan Beam Dump FEE Near Hall/CLOC Beam Transport Hall (at grade) Undulator Hall XRTDT Far Hall FG ~ 360’ FG ~ 320’ FG ~ 280’ FG ~ 245’ May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Construction Schedule LEGEND TI Design TII Design Preconstruction Construction • Major construction

LCLS CF Construction Schedule LEGEND TI Design TII Design Preconstruction Construction • Major construction phase FY 06 at 30 months duration • Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical system interfaces • Site-work at NEH is key! May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview • Increased duration of CM/GC procurement phase • DOE SO approval for CM/GC SOW – (in progress) David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

WBS 1. 09 TEC (BCWS x FY) $76. 7 M Construction Start Mar 06

WBS 1. 09 TEC (BCWS x FY) $76. 7 M Construction Start Mar 06 LLP – S 20, MMF, CMGC Phase 1 May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

ES & H Risks • Construction Safety – Is not a priority, but a

ES & H Risks • Construction Safety – Is not a priority, but a VALUE! (priorities change from time to time, values remain consistent over time) – All construction activities shall comply with Federal and State environmental, safety, health and building codes • Subcontractor activities • In-house activities – LCLS will approve GC construction safety program prior to any start of construction activities –Unique considerations to normal day-to-day construction projects at SLAC • Tunnel construction • Excavations • Subsurface construction • Weak ground conditions • Naturally occurring asbestos • Elevated work • Heavy equipment • Congested work areas (RSY) May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan SOW for CM/GC (LLP) has been developed and continues to have the

CM/GC Plan SOW for CM/GC (LLP) has been developed and continues to have the highest priority in the CF group as largest stand-alone procurement in the LCLS project Reviewed by SLAC DOE SO Final comments updated and sent to proof reader for final corrections Once approved by SLAC DOE SO, plan will be submitted to DOE HQ for approval (Chicago → DC) With blanket approval, there will not be a need to return for multiple approvals for bid packages May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan – cont’d Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) approved Advertisement placed in construction periodical

CM/GC Plan – cont’d Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) approved Advertisement placed in construction periodical – ENR Magazine Jan/Feb Meeting planned milestones are crucial! May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan – cont’d CM/GC services will be solicited with an award based on

CM/GC Plan – cont’d CM/GC services will be solicited with an award based on a best-value firm fixed price contract Phase 1 – preconstruction services Phase 2 – construction services of underground and major excavation effort, and construction services of above ground buildings Anticipating CM/GC award for Sept 05 CM/GC qualifications – partial list Technical competence Similar previous experience Successful history using second and third tier subcontractors Financial strength May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan – cont’d Outstanding safety record Experience Modification Rate (EMR) <. 81 LCLS

CM/GC Plan – cont’d Outstanding safety record Experience Modification Rate (EMR) <. 81 LCLS has EMR 1. 0 indicates that a company submits injury claims that decided to are considered average among their industry group place all contractors EMR > 1. 0 indicated that the company files more claims than working on projects to other similar companies have an EMR<0. 81 indicates that the company had filed fewer claims EMR of <. 81, go no than other similar companies -go Injury frequency and severity rates Safety Program evaluation and evaluations of the key personnel OSHA citation history References from previous projects Evaluation of the contractors’ integration of safety into their work practices May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Summary SOW completed and is currently being reviewed (with RFP package) in collaboration with

Summary SOW completed and is currently being reviewed (with RFP package) in collaboration with SLAC DOE SO, SLAC and LCLS project team Comments incorporated Complete CMGC package (RFP, SOW, T&C’s, etc) under review by technical writer DOE approval milestones are critical! CM services (interim phase) scheduled to commence in collaboration with 30% design review Cost validation Schedule review Constructability review Value Engineering May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

End of Presentation May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford.

End of Presentation May 11, 2005 DOE CF CMGC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu