CMGC Overview CMGC Plan Status Systems Description Cost

CM/GC Overview • CM/GC Plan & Status • Systems Description • Cost Estimate • Construction Schedule • Risks and Challenges • Summary April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan Why do we need a CMGC (Construction Manager & General Contractor) SLAC does not have the in-house expertise to independently manage a project of this magnitude April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan SOW for CM/GC has been developed and continues to have the highest priority in the CF group as largest stand-alone procurement in the LCLS project Currently being reviewed by SLAC SO DOE Comments being updated as we speak Once approved by SLAC SO DOE, the plan is to submit to DOE Headquarters for approval (Chicago → DC) Once plan is approved, there will not be a need to go back for multiple review and approval of bid packages April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan – cont’d Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) has been written and continues to be updated as necessary (signed copy on LCLS website) Advertisement placed in construction periodical – ENR Magazine Jan/Feb Meeting planned Milestones are crucial! April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan – cont’d CM/GC services will be solicited as firm-fixed price contracts Phase 1 – preconstruction services Phase 2 – construction services of underground and major excavation effort, and construction services of above ground buildings CM/GC Award 6/30/05 CM/GC qualifications – partial list Technical competence Similar previous experience Successful history using second and third tier subcontractors Financial strength April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Plan – cont’d Outstanding safety record LCLS has decided to place all contractors working on projects to have an EMR of <. 81, go no -go Experience Modification Rate (EMR) <. 81 EMR 1. 0 indicates that a company submits injury claims that are considered average among their industry group EMR > 1. 0 indicated that the company files more claims than other similar companies EMR<0. 81 indicates that the company had filed fewer claims than those compared against similar companies Injury frequency and severity rates Safety Program evaluation and evaluations of the key personnel OSHA citation history References from previous projects Evaluation of the contractors’ integration of safety into their work practices April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CMGC P 3 Schedule April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Phase 1 Effort Phase 1 – preconstruction activities to include: Provide effective overlap period and oversight of effort during Title II Estimates during Title II CPM Schedule Identify lead-time for critical items Design coordination Constructability reviews Value Engineering reviews Site investigation April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d Develop Project Management Plan (PMP) Construction Management Plan – outlines project scope, organization, and specific approach to accomplish project Project Safety Plan – project specific identifying job hazards, safety performance and individuals responsible for project safety Procurement Plan – identifies systems, methods and procedures for solicitation to subcontractors Quality Control and Assurance Plan – method of controlling time, cost and quality of various management tasks specific to the project April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Phase 1 Effort – cont’d Develop construction bid packages Develop list and contact potential bidders Develop prequalification criteria Solicit bids Recommend award to SLAC for approval of subcontractor Award contract to subcontractors April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CM/GC Phase 2 Effort Phase 2 – CM/GC shall provide all materials, labor, and services required to construct the Project All general conditions including field personnel, office staff, temporary offices, temporary construction, safety implementation, construction equipment, coordination of all subs, project administration, construction waste management, commissioning April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Below Grade Plan Beam Transport Hall Undulator Hall April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview Near Hall XRTDT Far Hall David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

New Facilities (below grade) Beam Transport Hall – 227 m long above grade facility to transport the electron beam through the existing RSY Electron Beam Dump – 40 m long underground facility used to separate the electron and x-ray beams Undulator Hall – 175 m long underground tunnel housing undulators and ancillary equipment Central Lab Office Complex – office facility to house ~ 300 LCLS researchers, engineers, technicians, administrative staff and visiting experimentalists Far Experimental Hall – underground cavern/tunnels to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shop space Front End Enclosure – 30 m long underground facility to house various diagnostic equipment in support of the photon beam Near Experimental Hall – underground facility whose primary function is to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shops X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel – 250 m long underground tunnel used to transport photon beams from NEH to FEH April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS Site Plan Spear Future Office Space Undulator Hall Research Yard Pep Ring Road SLC Office Complex Survey Tower NEH Beam Transport Hall Future Beam Lines Beam Dump Front End Enclosure SLC Tunnel X-Ray Transport Pep Tunnel April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL • IN RESEARCH YARD • 227 M LONG • 15’ x 14’-9” (W x H) • 63 M HEADHOUSE • 72” THICK WALLS • 48” THICK CEILING • 3 SERVICE AREAS • ENDS IN HEADWALL • HEADWALL LABYRINTH April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALL • UNDER HILL • 175 M LONG • 21’-11” x 14’-6” (W x H) • 33 UNDULATORS • HEAVY GRANITE SLABS • MONOLITHIC FLOOR • THERMAL BARRIERS April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALL ELECTRON BEAM DUMP • UNDER PEP RING RD. • 40 M LONG • 15’ x 12’-6” (W x H) • CAST-IN-PLACE • GROOVED FLOORS • E-BEAM DIPS DOWN • HEAVY METAL SHEILD April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALL ELECTRON BEAM DUMP FRONT END ENCLOSURE • EAST OF BEAM DUMP • 29 M LONG • BETWEEN SHEILDS • 15’ x 12’-6” (W x H) • CAST-IN-PLACE • NUMEROUS EQUIP. April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALL ELECTRON BEAM DUMP FRONT END ENCLOSURE NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL • EAST OF FEE • 39 M LONG • 2 FLOORS • 3 HUTCHES • LASER BAY (ABOVE) • CLOC FACILITY ABOVE • PREP & CONTROL AREA • FREIGHT ELEVATOR • CUT & FILL TECHNIQUE April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALL ELECTRON BEAM DUMP FRONT END ENCLOSURE NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL NEH HUTCHES • WITHIN NEH • TOTAL 3 (CURRENT) • ANOTHER 3 (FUTURE) • 10 M x 10 M • SHEILDING NEEDED • HEAVY SLIDING DOOR April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALL ELECTRON BEAM DUMP FRONT END ENCLOSURE NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL X-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL • EAST OF NEH • 250 M LONG • 18’ WIDE CONSTANT • BEAM SPLITS IN THREE • LABYRINTH TO FEH • WALKWAY ALONG BEAM April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

BEAM TRANSPORT HALL UNDULATOR HALL ELECTRON BEAM DUMP FRONT END ENCLOSURE NEAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL X-RAY TRANSPORT TUNNEL FAR EXPERIMENTAL HALL • END OF X-RAY TUNNEL • 29 M LONG • 2 CAVERN/TUNNELS • 31’ x 21’ (W x H) • CONNECTING TUNNELS • OFFICES IN EXTENDED CAVERN • ACCESS TUNNEL April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CLOC Exterior CLOC Floor. Elevations Plans • Headcount of CLOC Personnel = 284 • Capacity of Conf Center = 150 • Gross square footage of CLOC (offices and labs) = 68, 800 sf April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CLOC Exterior Elevations April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

CF FY Total Estimated Cost CMGC is responsible for ~$500 K for Phase I (Award CMGC thru March 06) and $59. 5 M for Phase II (Mar 06 thru 08) April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

LCLS CF Construction Schedule • Major construction phase FY 06 at 30 months duration • Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical system interfaces • Site-work at NEH is key! April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview • Added additional time for CM/GC procurement phase: DOE approval and CM/GC subcontractor bidding phase David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Title-II Draft Schedule This is essentially JE 100% stage April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview Interactive Planning session is scheduled for April 13, 14 (6/05) CMGC has real value added input early during design phase David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Risks and Challenges • Construction Safety – All construction activities to comply with Federal and State environmental, safety, health and building codes • Subcontractor activities • In-house activities – SLAC will approve construction safety program prior to start of construction • Enhanced construction program is a must – Special consideration is being addressed • Tunnel construction • RSY due to the congestion in the area April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Risks and Challenges – cont’d • Bay area construction market – Materials – Labor • Schedule concerns – Annual lab shut-down periods – Schedule for site characterization & remediation – FFTB decommissioning – On-site support April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Summary • Confidence is high for the successful implementation of the model chosen as it has already been proved at LBNL Molecular Foundry • CMGC holds the paper • Actual cost will be determined by competitive bids from subcontractors • Total estimated pricing established by SLAC April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

End of presentation April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu

Additional data • All subcontractor bids and award of contracts will be pre-approved by SLAC • Subcontractor bid award amounts added to CM/GC contract • Technical Documents: –CM/GC Statement of Work –General Requirements (01010) –Special Requirements (01210) –Schedules (01325) –Construction Waste Management (01570) –Schedule of Performance Milestones April 8, 2005 CM/GC Overview David Saenz saenzd@slac. stanford. edu