Clean Air Indicators ASEAN Working Group on Environmentally

Clean Air Indicators ASEAN Working Group on Environmentally Sustainable Cities (AWGESC) 9 th AWGESC Meeting, Yangon, Myanmar 2 - 3 May 2011

clean air indicators (old version) (before expert meeting, 28 march 2011) No Objectives 1 To ensure availability and quality of air quality data 2 To reduce air emissions from mobile sources Environmental Indicators Output & Performance Environmental Quality Number of days in a year ambient SO 2, NO 2, CO, PM 10 levels exceeded the WHO/USEPA air quality standards n % vehicles that meet city/national standards during roadside inspection 3 To reduce air % industries emissions from land that fulfill the -based sources requirement of national standards 4 To increase energy % of efficiency and the alternative use of cleaner fuels used Number of days in a year that Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) exceeded 100 (‘unhealthy’) n

Scoring and grading system Performance (1 -100) No 1 Objectives To ensure availability and quality of air quality data Number of days compliance 0 -15 days > 1530 days >3045 days >45 -60 days >60 -90 days >90 -120 days >120150 days >150 days Number of days in a year that Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) exceeded 100 (‘unhealthy’) 100 80 60 40 20 10 5 0 - SO 2 100 80 60 40 20 10 5 0 - NO 2 100 80 60 40 20 10 5 0 - CO 100 80 60 40 20 10 5 0 - PM 10 100 80 60 40 20 10 5 0 Number of days in a year ambient 4 key parameters levels exceeded the USEPA air quality standards

No 2 3 No 4 Objectives % compliance Performance (1 -100) 1 -10 >10 -25 >25 -50 >50 -75 >75 -100 % gasoline fueledvehicles that meet city/national standards during roadside inspection 10 25 50 75 100 % diesel fueledvehicles that meet city/national standards during roadside inspection 10 25 50 75 100 To reduce air emissions from landbased sources % new industries that conduct Environmental Impact Study 10 25 50 75 100 Objectives Ratio compliance To reduce air emissions from mobile sources To increase Ratio of unleaded to energy leaded petrol sold efficiency and the use of cleaner fuels Performance (1 -100) 1 -10 >10 -25 >25 -50 >50 -75 >75 -100 10 25 50 75 100

clean air indicators, new revision (as a result of expert meeting, 28 march 2011) No Environmental Indicators Objectives Output & Performance 1 To ensure availability and quality of air quality data Monitoring Frequency Number of Pollutants being Monitored 2 To reduce air emissions from mobile sources Availability of Public Transport System to carry out inspection on vehicles % of Compliance with standards 3 To reduce air emissions from industrial sources System to carry out inspection for industries 4 To increase energy efficiency EE Promotional Programmes/Initiatives in places Environmental Quality Meeting of Standards

Scoring and Grading System Scoring and grading system 1 To ensure availability and quality of air quality data Frequency of Monitoring per year (Weighting 50%) 0 Less than 10 times 11 times to 25 times More than 25 times Continuous Scoring 0 25 50 75 100 Number of Pollutants Being Monitored (Weighting 30%) 0 1 2 3 4 (PM 10) (PM 10 + 1 pollutant) (PM 10 + 2 pollutants) (PM 10 + 3 pollutants) Scoring 0 25 50 75 100 Meeting of Standards (Weighting 20%) (Concentration base on daily average) Scoring Not Meeting of meeting of National Standard for PM 10 0 75 Meeting of WHO Standard for PM 10 100

2 To reduce air emissio ns from mobile sources Availability of Public Transport (Weighting 50%) Informal public transport Formal Public Transport that is not organized and not service. Orientated e. g Paratransit Scoring 25 50 75 100 System to carry out inspection on Vehicles (Weighing 25%) No Ad-Hoc Roadside Periodic Ad-Hoc Roadside & Periodic 0 50 75 100 No Compliance Report 0 -25 >25 -50 >50 -75 >75 -100 0 25 50 75 100 Scoring % of Compliance with standards (Weighting 25%) Scoring Mix of Organised, Informal Serviceand Orientate Serviced, Orientate Controlle d, d Formal Controlled Public Formal Transport public transport Note: Informal Public Transport is defined as not controlled by government with no route assigned.

Note: We emphasise the need for enforcement however it is nearly impossible to establish a common system of indictors for it. 3 To reduce air emissions from industrial sources System to carry out inspection for industries Scoring No Ad-Hoc Inspection Regular Inspection Ad-Hoc & Regular Inspection 0 50 75 100 Note : We emphasise the need for enforcement however it is nearly impossible to establish a common system of indictors for it. 4 To increase energy efficiency EE Promotional Programmes /Initiatives in places Scoring No 0 National Sub-National Level Programmes/ Initiatives implemented Implemented / or on top of the National Programmes 50 -75 76 -100 Note: Cities would have to name the sub-national programmes/initiatives. The scoring depends on the complexity and numbers of the programmes/initiatives for the evaluator to determine.

• The valuation for Clean Air is undertaken using the following method: Use average performance score for sub-components contained in the same component The total performance score is categorized into the following 5 (five) grades: • • • Total performance score < 90 is very poor 90 ≤ total performance score < 180 is poor 180 ≤ total performance score < 270 is moderate 270 ≤ total performance score < 360 is good Total performance score ≥ 360 is excellent

THANK YOU Muhammad Zakaria mzaky 43@yahoo. com 10