CKM priority setting 2015 CC Team CKM Team
- Slides: 16
CKM priority setting 2015: CC Team CKM Team Meeting Addis Ababa, February 2015
Team members
CKM Delivery Areas Prioritization
Perceived importance of CKM delivery areas from participatory matrix scoring 0, 9 Awareness 0, 8 0, 7 0, 6 Curation 0, 5 0, 4 Advocacy 0, 3 0, 2 0, 1 0 Publishing Engagement Collaboration
Perceived importance of CKM delivery areas from participatory matrix scoring: embedded versus institutional PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE OF CKM DELIVERY AREAS EMBEDDED VS. INSTITUTIONAL Embedded Curation Institutional 4, 5 Awareness 4 3, 5 3 2, 5 2 1, 5 1 0, 5 0 Publishing Advocacy Engagement Collaboration
Perceived importance of CKM delivery areas from participatory matrix scoring – by team type PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE OF CKM DELIVERY AREAS BY TEAM TYPE A&A team Curation E&C team P&C team 4, 5 Awareness 4 3, 5 3 2, 5 2 1, 5 1 0, 5 0 Publishing Advocacy Engagement Collaboration
Pairwise ranking: Relative importance of CKM delivery areas Pairwise ranking: Relative importance of delivery areas 6 Awareness 5 4 Curation 3 Advocacy 2 1 0 Publishing Engagement Collaboration
CKM Enablers Ranking
CKM Enablers at ILRI 4= major constraint, 0= no constraint CKM Enablers at ILRI Score (0 -4): 4= major constraint, 0= no constraint Management buy-in 3, 5 3 CKM team expertise 2, 5 2 Infrastructure 1, 5 1 0, 5 0 CKM workflows CKM knowledge and skills of staff Financial resources Demand from scientists
CKM Deliverables Ranking
CKM High Level Deliverables 4= high priority, 0= no priority CKM deliverables Score (0 -4): 4= high priority, 0= no priority Web and digital publishing platforms Advocacy coalitions 4, 5 4 3, 5 CKM Leadership, planning, management 3 Social engagement tools and support 2, 5 2 Collaboration platforms and support 1, 5 1 Open access platforms and publishing Multimedia and print publishing Media, campaigns and Influencing for big events and products 0, 5 0 Corporate news and products Event facilitation and support Information services and contact management Internal communication support
CKM Big Projects Ranking
CKM Big Projects 4= high priority, 0= no priority Big Projects Score (0 -4): 4= high priority, 0= no priority CGSpace 4, 5 4 Website re-design 3, 5 3 Internal Communications 2, 5 2 1, 5 1 0, 5 (Social) media engagement 0 Salesforce CRM Intranet (within website) OCS comms support Open access scale out
CKM Small Projects Ranking
CKM Small Projects 4= high priority, 0= no priority Small Projects Score (0 -4): 4= high priority, 0= no priority Asana 4, 5 4 Publishing review tool 3, 5 3 CKM ‘service packages’ 2, 5 2 1, 5 1 0, 5 Publishing refresh 0 Infocenter space in Nairobi CKM overall strategy/dashboard CKM plans (for each team) E-newsletters upgrade
Reflections • We focused more on engagement, awareness and collaboration irrespective of our individual focusses • We clarified some terms ‘ curation’ , ‘engagement’ what they mean/include • For some projects/locations- their focus may remain different eg. Publishing for SE Asia rather than for the whole of CKM How did the discussion go? • We came to consensus more than we thought
- Burman's priority list gives priority to
- Priority mail vs priority mail express
- Manganato.ckm
- Matrice ckm
- Ckm 2006
- Manganato.ckm
- Parler.ckm
- Matrice di cabibbo
- Slido.ckm
- Pronhub.ckm
- Ckm 2006
- Understanding jim crow (setting the setting)
- Team spirit becomes team infatuation
- Team spirit becomes team infatuation
- The white team cheers for the blue team, just like
- Achieve the core priority standards
- Cuda stream priority