Civil Procedure Allocation Allocation Questionnaire Form N 150

  • Slides: 13
Download presentation
Civil Procedure Allocation

Civil Procedure Allocation

Allocation Questionnaire • Form N 150 • PD 262. 2 • parties should co-operate

Allocation Questionnaire • Form N 150 • PD 262. 2 • parties should co-operate in completing the allocation questionnaire - PD 26. 2. 3 • will be served when defence(s) filed 26. 3(2) • “return day” which will be at least 14 days after service (26. 3(6). • cannot be varied be agreement (26. 3(7).

Allocation Questionnaire • PD 26. 2. 5 – if neither party files 3 days/

Allocation Questionnaire • PD 26. 2. 5 – if neither party files 3 days/ struck out • only one party files the court can (a) allocate or if there is insufficient information (b) order an allocation hearing make the party in default pay the costs thereof • court could also order an allocation hearing of its own motion (26. 5(4) • 7 days notice (PD 26. 6. 2)

The Tracks Small Claims Track (CPR 27) • normal track for claims with a

The Tracks Small Claims Track (CPR 27) • normal track for claims with a financial value of not more than £ 5, 000 or if it is a PI claim, if the claim for “damages for personal injuries” , (ie: pain suffering and loss of amenity 26. 6(2) is not more than £ 1, 000. • Special rules about housing disrepair claims

The Tracks Small Claims Track (CPR 27) • hearings “will be informal”(27. 8(2) •

The Tracks Small Claims Track (CPR 27) • hearings “will be informal”(27. 8(2) • strict rules of evidence do not apply (27. 8(3) • lay representatives allowed (PD 27. 3)

The Tracks Small Claims Track (CPR 27) • No costs apart from • fixed

The Tracks Small Claims Track (CPR 27) • No costs apart from • fixed costs on commencement of a claim (see Table 1 in Part 45) • allocation fee if paid (there isn’t one on claims £ 1000>) • witness expenses or lost earnings • costs “to be paid by a party who has behaved unreasonably” (27. 14(2) (d)

The Tracks Small Claims Track (CPR 27) • fabricating a defence (Martin v Sherwood

The Tracks Small Claims Track (CPR 27) • fabricating a defence (Martin v Sherwood 9/6/95) • Failing to remedy substantial defects in particulars when ordered to do so (Hayes v Airtour Holidays Ltd (costs) [2001] CL 436 • Stating in a defence that a key document exists then not producing it at the hearing (Snow v Price CC [2003] CL March 59

The Tracks Fast Track (CPR 28) • Cases • -for which the small claims

The Tracks Fast Track (CPR 28) • Cases • -for which the small claims track is not the normal track and which have a financial value of not less than £ 15, 000 • - where the trial is likely to last no longer than one day (could order a split trial PD 26. 9. 1(c) • - where oral expert evidence is limited to one expert per party per field and no more than 2 fields • are cases for which the Fast Track is the normal track.

The Tracks Fast Track (CPR 28) • standard directions designed to progress matters to

The Tracks Fast Track (CPR 28) • standard directions designed to progress matters to trial in 30 weeks (PD 28. 3. 12 and the appendix to PD 28) • can be varied

The Tracks Multi Track (CPR 29) • Claims for which the other tracks are

The Tracks Multi Track (CPR 29) • Claims for which the other tracks are not normal (26. 6(7) • court will usually arrange a case management conference or pre-trial review or both to agree directions (29. 2(1) • parties should co-operate esp. re. costs • court could make a “prospective costs cap order” – see Leigh v Michelin Tyre plc [2003] EWCA Civ 1766 and the White Book commentary at 3. 1. 8

Pre Trial Checklists • On fast (28. 5 and PD 28. 6)and multi (29.

Pre Trial Checklists • On fast (28. 5 and PD 28. 6)and multi (29. 6 and PD 29. 8) tracks – used to ensure directions complied with and arrange date for trial. • Should exchange (PD 28. 6. 1(4), PD 29. 8. 1(5). • If neither party returns – 3 days/struck out(PD 28. 6. 5(1), PD 29. 8. 3(1) • If some don’t – directions or trial date fixed (PD 28. 6. 5(2) – could hold a listing hearing on multi track (PD 29. 8. 5) • Trial unlikely to be moved PD 28. 5. 4(1), (PD 29. 7. 4(6)

Other Relevant matters • • • CPR 26. 8 financial value remedy sought complexity

Other Relevant matters • • • CPR 26. 8 financial value remedy sought complexity number of parties or likely parties value/complexity of any counterclaim or other Part 20 claim (PD 26. 7. 7) oral evidence the importance of the claim to persons who are not parties to the proceedings views expressed by the parties circumstances of the parties

Other Relevant matters • • • 26. 8(2) financial value will disregard (a)any amount

Other Relevant matters • • • 26. 8(2) financial value will disregard (a)any amount not in dispute (b)any claim for interest (c)costs (d)any contributory negligence.